乙二胺四乙酸、马来酸和富马酸对根管治疗后根断裂韧性的影响——体外研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_252_23
Aabha Gautam Dave, P Laxmish Mallya, N Vasudev Ballal, Ramya Shenoy
{"title":"乙二胺四乙酸、马来酸和富马酸对根管治疗后根断裂韧性的影响——体外研究。","authors":"Aabha Gautam Dave, P Laxmish Mallya, N Vasudev Ballal, Ramya Shenoy","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_252_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonic activation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), maleic acid (MA), and fumaric acid (FA) in combination with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on postendodontic treatment root fracture toughness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction and were kept on average 14 mm long. With the exception of eight randomly selected teeth acting as a negative control group (Group I/nonprepared), the rest were prepared till F3. Thirty-two specimens were randomly placed into four groups equally and then irrigated using the final irrigation protocols. Saline and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group II, 17% EDTA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group III, 7% MA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group IV, and 0.7% FA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group V. The irrigants were ultrasonically activated in every group. The root canals were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. The roots were embedded along the long axis in the self-curing acrylic blocks along with polyvinyl siloxane, leaving the coronal 2 mm of the root exposed. The specimens were tested using a universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The <i>Post hoc</i> Tamhane's and one-way ANOVA tests were applied to examine the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result of the study revealed that 0.7% FA (598.09 N) provided better root fracture resistance than EDTA (428.07 N) and MA (511.87 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusion derived from the study was that 0.7% FA provided better fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when compared to 17% EDTA and 7% MA.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 4","pages":"453-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, maleic acid, and fumaric acid on postendodontic treatment root fracture toughness - An <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Aabha Gautam Dave, P Laxmish Mallya, N Vasudev Ballal, Ramya Shenoy\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcd.jcd_252_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonic activation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), maleic acid (MA), and fumaric acid (FA) in combination with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on postendodontic treatment root fracture toughness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction and were kept on average 14 mm long. With the exception of eight randomly selected teeth acting as a negative control group (Group I/nonprepared), the rest were prepared till F3. Thirty-two specimens were randomly placed into four groups equally and then irrigated using the final irrigation protocols. Saline and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group II, 17% EDTA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group III, 7% MA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group IV, and 0.7% FA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group V. The irrigants were ultrasonically activated in every group. The root canals were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. The roots were embedded along the long axis in the self-curing acrylic blocks along with polyvinyl siloxane, leaving the coronal 2 mm of the root exposed. The specimens were tested using a universal testing machine.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The <i>Post hoc</i> Tamhane's and one-way ANOVA tests were applied to examine the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result of the study revealed that 0.7% FA (598.09 N) provided better root fracture resistance than EDTA (428.07 N) and MA (511.87 N).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conclusion derived from the study was that 0.7% FA provided better fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when compared to 17% EDTA and 7% MA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"453-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_252_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_252_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、马来酸(MA)和富马酸(FA)与次氯酸钠(NaOCl)联合超声活化对根管治疗后根断裂韧性的有效性。材料和方法:将40颗单根下颌前磨牙在牙骨质-釉层交界处下方切开,平均保持14mm长。除了随机选择的8颗牙齿作为阴性对照组(第I组/非预备组)外,其余牙齿都预备到F3。32个样本被随机分为四组,每组平均,然后使用最终的灌溉方案进行灌溉。第二组用生理盐水和NaOCl灌溉,第三组用17%EDTA和NaOCl灌溉,第四组用7%MA和NaOCI灌溉,第五组用0.7%FA和NaOC1灌溉。根管用牙胶和AH-Plus封闭剂封闭。根沿着长轴与聚乙烯基硅氧烷一起嵌入自固化丙烯酸嵌段中,使根的冠部暴露2mm。使用通用试验机对试样进行试验。统计分析:采用Post-hoc Tamhane和单因素方差分析检验数据。结果:0.7%FA(598.09 N)比EDTA(428.07 N)和MA(511.87 N)具有更好的根断裂阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, maleic acid, and fumaric acid on postendodontic treatment root fracture toughness - An <i>in vitro</i> study.

Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, maleic acid, and fumaric acid on postendodontic treatment root fracture toughness - An in vitro study.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonic activation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), maleic acid (MA), and fumaric acid (FA) in combination with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on postendodontic treatment root fracture toughness.

Materials and methods: Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction and were kept on average 14 mm long. With the exception of eight randomly selected teeth acting as a negative control group (Group I/nonprepared), the rest were prepared till F3. Thirty-two specimens were randomly placed into four groups equally and then irrigated using the final irrigation protocols. Saline and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group II, 17% EDTA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group III, 7% MA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group IV, and 0.7% FA and NaOCl were used to irrigate Group V. The irrigants were ultrasonically activated in every group. The root canals were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. The roots were embedded along the long axis in the self-curing acrylic blocks along with polyvinyl siloxane, leaving the coronal 2 mm of the root exposed. The specimens were tested using a universal testing machine.

Statistical analysis: The Post hoc Tamhane's and one-way ANOVA tests were applied to examine the data.

Results: The result of the study revealed that 0.7% FA (598.09 N) provided better root fracture resistance than EDTA (428.07 N) and MA (511.87 N).

Conclusion: The conclusion derived from the study was that 0.7% FA provided better fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when compared to 17% EDTA and 7% MA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信