重症监护和脆弱的不同含义。

Rebeca Mamede da Silva Alves, Rafael Casali Ribeiro
{"title":"重症监护和脆弱的不同含义。","authors":"Rebeca Mamede da Silva Alves, Rafael Casali Ribeiro","doi":"10.5935/2965-2774.20230317-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the eyes of laypeople, intensive care may seem like a precise and objective field of study. Even to health professionals, believing that medical practice within intensive care units (ICUs) should be predominantly guided by technical decisions seems sensible and reasonable, even though there are nuances and some space for subjectivity. However, a careful look at particularities of the decision-making process in intensive care shows how different concepts and values, sometimes implicitly adopted, affect the ways intensivists think and, consequently, act. This article discusses a concept that largely intersects with the work processes in intensive care but remains poorly discussed: vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive care and the different meanings of vulnerability.\",\"authors\":\"Rebeca Mamede da Silva Alves, Rafael Casali Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/2965-2774.20230317-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the eyes of laypeople, intensive care may seem like a precise and objective field of study. Even to health professionals, believing that medical practice within intensive care units (ICUs) should be predominantly guided by technical decisions seems sensible and reasonable, even though there are nuances and some space for subjectivity. However, a careful look at particularities of the decision-making process in intensive care shows how different concepts and values, sometimes implicitly adopted, affect the ways intensivists think and, consequently, act. This article discusses a concept that largely intersects with the work processes in intensive care but remains poorly discussed: vulnerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230317-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230317-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensive care and the different meanings of vulnerability.
In the eyes of laypeople, intensive care may seem like a precise and objective field of study. Even to health professionals, believing that medical practice within intensive care units (ICUs) should be predominantly guided by technical decisions seems sensible and reasonable, even though there are nuances and some space for subjectivity. However, a careful look at particularities of the decision-making process in intensive care shows how different concepts and values, sometimes implicitly adopted, affect the ways intensivists think and, consequently, act. This article discusses a concept that largely intersects with the work processes in intensive care but remains poorly discussed: vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信