企业可持续性披露中的健康和福祉关键绩效指标。对欧洲主要公司样本的可持续发展报告的审查。

Q2 Medicine
Michele Dolcini, Andrea Brambilla, Marco Gola, Stefano Capolongo
{"title":"企业可持续性披露中的健康和福祉关键绩效指标。对欧洲主要公司样本的可持续发展报告的审查。","authors":"Michele Dolcini,&nbsp;Andrea Brambilla,&nbsp;Marco Gola,&nbsp;Stefano Capolongo","doi":"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Health and Well-Being (HWB) measurement represents a key issue for companies in all sectors and a core element of social sustainability, according to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite its importance for companies and in sustainability reporting, the topic has not been investigated yet from a cross-sectoral perspective. Therefore, this research aims to assess if health and well-being are disclosed in sustainability reports of the largest European companies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The disclosure of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) has been investigated and compared according to the main international frameworks of sustainability. The research focused on sustainability reporting from a sample of the 30 largest companies in three methodological steps. First, the inclusion of HWB issues has been analyzed, identifying references to the SDGs and ISO 45001 within the documents. A second level of analysis considered the adoption of the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) Standards, with particular attention to Health metrics (GRI:403). The third level of analysis aimed at researching health and well-being performances, linked to specific KPIs from two selected case studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review highlighted that all 30 companies generally refer to SDG 3 and SDG 8 in their sustainability reporting while 83%(n=25) of them also apply either Occupational Health and Safety ISO 45001 or Health metrics in GRI Standards; 22 (73%) companies adopted both GRI as the sustainability reporting standard and disclosed the adoption of ISO 45001 management system. Only in two cases, an additional structured framework for HWB is reported highlighting the need for more comprehensive KPIs, especially for employee's well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted that health indicators disclosure is generally limited to GRI Standards disclosure. To achieve greater transparency in sustainability reporting, there is a need to further investigate the issue. (www.actabiomedica.it).</p>","PeriodicalId":35682,"journal":{"name":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health and well-being key performance indicators in corporate sustainability disclosure. A review of sustainability reports from a sample of major European companies.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Dolcini,&nbsp;Andrea Brambilla,&nbsp;Marco Gola,&nbsp;Stefano Capolongo\",\"doi\":\"10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Health and Well-Being (HWB) measurement represents a key issue for companies in all sectors and a core element of social sustainability, according to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite its importance for companies and in sustainability reporting, the topic has not been investigated yet from a cross-sectoral perspective. Therefore, this research aims to assess if health and well-being are disclosed in sustainability reports of the largest European companies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The disclosure of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) has been investigated and compared according to the main international frameworks of sustainability. The research focused on sustainability reporting from a sample of the 30 largest companies in three methodological steps. First, the inclusion of HWB issues has been analyzed, identifying references to the SDGs and ISO 45001 within the documents. A second level of analysis considered the adoption of the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) Standards, with particular attention to Health metrics (GRI:403). The third level of analysis aimed at researching health and well-being performances, linked to specific KPIs from two selected case studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review highlighted that all 30 companies generally refer to SDG 3 and SDG 8 in their sustainability reporting while 83%(n=25) of them also apply either Occupational Health and Safety ISO 45001 or Health metrics in GRI Standards; 22 (73%) companies adopted both GRI as the sustainability reporting standard and disclosed the adoption of ISO 45001 management system. Only in two cases, an additional structured framework for HWB is reported highlighting the need for more comprehensive KPIs, especially for employee's well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted that health indicators disclosure is generally limited to GRI Standards disclosure. To achieve greater transparency in sustainability reporting, there is a need to further investigate the issue. (www.actabiomedica.it).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94iS3.14334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目标:根据可持续发展目标,健康和福祉(HWB)衡量是所有行业公司的一个关键问题,也是社会可持续性的核心要素。尽管该主题对公司和可持续性报告很重要,但尚未从跨部门的角度对其进行调查。因此,本研究旨在评估欧洲最大公司的可持续发展报告中是否披露了健康和福祉。方法:根据可持续性的主要国际框架,对关键绩效指标(KPI)的披露情况进行调查和比较。这项研究的重点是从30家最大公司的样本中分三个方法步骤进行可持续性报告。首先,对HWB问题进行了分析,确定了文件中对可持续发展目标和ISO 45001的引用。第二级分析考虑采用全球报告倡议(GRI)标准,特别关注健康指标(GRI:403)。第三级分析旨在研究健康和幸福表现,与两个选定案例研究中的特定KPI相关联。结果:审查强调,所有30家公司在可持续发展报告中通常都提到了SDG 3和SDG 8,而其中83%(n=25)的公司也应用了职业健康与安全ISO 45001或GRI标准中的健康指标;22家(73%)公司采用GRI作为可持续性报告标准,并披露采用ISO 45001管理体系。只有在两种情况下,报告了HWB的额外结构化框架,强调需要更全面的KPI,特别是对于员工的健康状况。结论:该研究强调,健康指标的披露通常仅限于GRI标准的披露。为了提高可持续性报告的透明度,有必要进一步调查这一问题。(www.actabiomedica.it)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health and well-being key performance indicators in corporate sustainability disclosure. A review of sustainability reports from a sample of major European companies.

Background and aim: Health and Well-Being (HWB) measurement represents a key issue for companies in all sectors and a core element of social sustainability, according to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite its importance for companies and in sustainability reporting, the topic has not been investigated yet from a cross-sectoral perspective. Therefore, this research aims to assess if health and well-being are disclosed in sustainability reports of the largest European companies.

Methods: The disclosure of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) has been investigated and compared according to the main international frameworks of sustainability. The research focused on sustainability reporting from a sample of the 30 largest companies in three methodological steps. First, the inclusion of HWB issues has been analyzed, identifying references to the SDGs and ISO 45001 within the documents. A second level of analysis considered the adoption of the Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) Standards, with particular attention to Health metrics (GRI:403). The third level of analysis aimed at researching health and well-being performances, linked to specific KPIs from two selected case studies.

Results: The review highlighted that all 30 companies generally refer to SDG 3 and SDG 8 in their sustainability reporting while 83%(n=25) of them also apply either Occupational Health and Safety ISO 45001 or Health metrics in GRI Standards; 22 (73%) companies adopted both GRI as the sustainability reporting standard and disclosed the adoption of ISO 45001 management system. Only in two cases, an additional structured framework for HWB is reported highlighting the need for more comprehensive KPIs, especially for employee's well-being.

Conclusions: The study highlighted that health indicators disclosure is generally limited to GRI Standards disclosure. To achieve greater transparency in sustainability reporting, there is a need to further investigate the issue. (www.actabiomedica.it).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense
Acta Biomedica de l''Ateneo Parmense Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis is the official Journal of the Society of Medicine and Natural Sciences of Parma, and it is one of the few Italian Journals to be included in many excellent scientific data banks (i.e. MEDLINE). Acta Bio Medica was founded in 1887 and its founders and collaborators, Clinicians and Surgeons, entered history. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis publishes Original Articles, Commentaries, Review Articles, Case Reports of experimental and general Medicine. A section is devoted to a Continuous Medical Education programme in order to help primary care Physicians to improve the quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信