[屈肌腱手术的当前趋势:一项全国在线调查的结果]。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Elisabeth Maria Haas-Lützenberger, Johannes Strolla, Riccardo Giunta, Elias Volkmer
{"title":"[屈肌腱手术的当前趋势:一项全国在线调查的结果]。","authors":"Elisabeth Maria Haas-Lützenberger,&nbsp;Johannes Strolla,&nbsp;Riccardo Giunta,&nbsp;Elias Volkmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2060-0755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the last 50 years, there has been a change in trend in flexor tendon surgery. After the introduction of the 2-strand technique, the 4-strand technique was propagated in the 1990s. In order to obtain a status quo of which technique is used in Germany and if the gold standard of the 4-strand suture has changed in favour of a 6-strand suture, we conducted an online survey among members of the DGH (\"Deutsche Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie\", German Society for Hand Surgery) on the suture technique of flexor tendon injuries zone 2.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted and sent out by email to all DGH members. The questionnaire included 7 questions. Participants accessed the survey via a link.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>155 hand surgeons from Germany participated in the survey. All of them answered the questionnaire in full and all questionnaires were included in the evaluation. The main question of how many strands are currently used for core suturing was answered as follows: 21% (n=32) of the 155 participants (TN) stated that they use a 2-strand suture, 53% used (n=82) a 4-strand suture and 10% used a 6-strand suture. Regarding techniques, 81 TN used the Kirchmayr-Kessler technique or a modification of it, 9 TN used the M-Tang technique, and 15 TN indicated \"other technique\". The question about the application of an epitendinous suture was overwhelmingly answered with \"yes\". Here, 98.2% agreed. Only with regard to the suture material, different opinions were found. 68% (n=106) use an absorbable monofilament suture (such as PDS). Just under a quarter (23%, n=36) use a non-absorbable monofilament suture (such as Prolene).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flexor tendon surgery has changed considerably due to intensive advances in research during the last decades. It was interesting to note in our survey that German hand surgeons have adapted their suture technique within the last years based on the results of the literature. Our results clearly show that convincing scientific data has an influence on the choice of surgical technique and that discussions about new techniques, e. g. in the context of annual meetings, may well stimulate the auditorium to rethink.</p>","PeriodicalId":55075,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Current Trends in Flexor Tendon Surgery: Results of a National Online Survey].\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Maria Haas-Lützenberger,&nbsp;Johannes Strolla,&nbsp;Riccardo Giunta,&nbsp;Elias Volkmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2060-0755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Within the last 50 years, there has been a change in trend in flexor tendon surgery. After the introduction of the 2-strand technique, the 4-strand technique was propagated in the 1990s. In order to obtain a status quo of which technique is used in Germany and if the gold standard of the 4-strand suture has changed in favour of a 6-strand suture, we conducted an online survey among members of the DGH (\\\"Deutsche Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie\\\", German Society for Hand Surgery) on the suture technique of flexor tendon injuries zone 2.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted and sent out by email to all DGH members. The questionnaire included 7 questions. Participants accessed the survey via a link.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>155 hand surgeons from Germany participated in the survey. All of them answered the questionnaire in full and all questionnaires were included in the evaluation. The main question of how many strands are currently used for core suturing was answered as follows: 21% (n=32) of the 155 participants (TN) stated that they use a 2-strand suture, 53% used (n=82) a 4-strand suture and 10% used a 6-strand suture. Regarding techniques, 81 TN used the Kirchmayr-Kessler technique or a modification of it, 9 TN used the M-Tang technique, and 15 TN indicated \\\"other technique\\\". The question about the application of an epitendinous suture was overwhelmingly answered with \\\"yes\\\". Here, 98.2% agreed. Only with regard to the suture material, different opinions were found. 68% (n=106) use an absorbable monofilament suture (such as PDS). Just under a quarter (23%, n=36) use a non-absorbable monofilament suture (such as Prolene).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flexor tendon surgery has changed considerably due to intensive advances in research during the last decades. It was interesting to note in our survey that German hand surgeons have adapted their suture technique within the last years based on the results of the literature. Our results clearly show that convincing scientific data has an influence on the choice of surgical technique and that discussions about new techniques, e. g. in the context of annual meetings, may well stimulate the auditorium to rethink.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2060-0755\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2060-0755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的50年里,屈肌腱手术的趋势发生了变化。在引入2股技术之后,4股技术在20世纪90年代得到了推广。为了获得在德国使用哪种技术的现状,并且如果4股缝线的金标准已经改变为有利于6股缝线,我们在DGH(“Deutsche Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie”,德国手外科学会)成员中就屈肌腱损伤2区的缝合技术进行了在线调查。材料和方法:进行了一项在线调查,并通过电子邮件发送给所有DGH成员。问卷包括7个问题。参与者通过链接访问了调查。结果:来自德国的155名手外科医生参与了调查。他们都完整地回答了问卷,所有问卷都包含在评估中。目前有多少股线用于核心缝合的主要问题回答如下:155名参与者(TN)中,21%(n=32)表示他们使用2股线,53%(n=82)使用4股线,10%使用6股线。关于技术,81个TN使用Kirchmayr-Kessler技术或其改进,9个TN使用M-Tang技术,15个TN表示“其他技术”。关于应用腱上缝合线的问题,绝大多数人的回答是“是”。98.2%的人表示同意。仅就缝合材料而言,就存在不同意见。68%(n=106)使用可吸收单丝缝线(如PDS)。不到四分之一(23%,n=36)的人使用不可吸收的单丝缝合线(如Prolene)。结论:在过去的几十年里,由于研究的深入发展,屈肌腱手术已经发生了很大的变化。值得注意的是,在我们的调查中,德国手外科医生在过去几年中根据文献结果调整了他们的缝合技术。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,令人信服的科学数据对手术技术的选择和对新技术的讨论有影响。 g.在年会的背景下,很可能会刺激观众重新思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Current Trends in Flexor Tendon Surgery: Results of a National Online Survey].

Within the last 50 years, there has been a change in trend in flexor tendon surgery. After the introduction of the 2-strand technique, the 4-strand technique was propagated in the 1990s. In order to obtain a status quo of which technique is used in Germany and if the gold standard of the 4-strand suture has changed in favour of a 6-strand suture, we conducted an online survey among members of the DGH ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie", German Society for Hand Surgery) on the suture technique of flexor tendon injuries zone 2.

Material and methods: An online survey was conducted and sent out by email to all DGH members. The questionnaire included 7 questions. Participants accessed the survey via a link.

Results: 155 hand surgeons from Germany participated in the survey. All of them answered the questionnaire in full and all questionnaires were included in the evaluation. The main question of how many strands are currently used for core suturing was answered as follows: 21% (n=32) of the 155 participants (TN) stated that they use a 2-strand suture, 53% used (n=82) a 4-strand suture and 10% used a 6-strand suture. Regarding techniques, 81 TN used the Kirchmayr-Kessler technique or a modification of it, 9 TN used the M-Tang technique, and 15 TN indicated "other technique". The question about the application of an epitendinous suture was overwhelmingly answered with "yes". Here, 98.2% agreed. Only with regard to the suture material, different opinions were found. 68% (n=106) use an absorbable monofilament suture (such as PDS). Just under a quarter (23%, n=36) use a non-absorbable monofilament suture (such as Prolene).

Conclusion: Flexor tendon surgery has changed considerably due to intensive advances in research during the last decades. It was interesting to note in our survey that German hand surgeons have adapted their suture technique within the last years based on the results of the literature. Our results clearly show that convincing scientific data has an influence on the choice of surgical technique and that discussions about new techniques, e. g. in the context of annual meetings, may well stimulate the auditorium to rethink.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten finden Sie die neuesten Informationen über: Diagnostik Verfahrenswahl state of the art / neueste Techniken rekonstruktive Verfahren Behandlung infolge von Traumata oder OP Bewertung der Ergebnisse Klinische Forschung Interessante Darstellung der neuesten Erkenntnisse in Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten. Exzellent veranschaulicht durch ein klares Layout und reiche Bebilderung. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Organschaften Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie und Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信