辅助医务人员对心血管系统评估信心的定量研究。

Samantha Sweet, Phil Withers
{"title":"辅助医务人员对心血管系统评估信心的定量研究。","authors":"Samantha Sweet, Phil Withers","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2023.9.8.2.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients presenting to the ambulance services with cardiovascular complaints are common, and as such, represent a notable proportion of paramedic clinical practice. Numerous texts refer to a system-based approach to cardiovascular assessment, however the application by paramedics is scarcely researched. As such, this article aims to quantify paramedic confidence levels regarding an examination of a patient with a cardiovascular complaint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted, recruiting paramedics from one ambulance trust within the United Kingdom and analysing their confidence levels of assessing a patient with a cardiovascular complaint. Paramedics were recruited using purposive sampling and asked to complete an online questionnaire exploring their confidence levels among cardiovascular assessments, which were subsequently quantified to summarise confidence levels expressed by these respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 331 responses across one ambulance service were received in April 2021. Of these, 90.3% (299/331) reported a high level of confidence with the general cardiovascular assessment. Throughout all individual elements of assessment, over 50% of respondents indicated they feel confident with the examination, except when assessing heaves and thrills where 56.2% (185/329) and 55.1% (182/330) of respondents disagreed with feeling confident, respectively. A strong correlation was seen throughout the results between confidence levels and the reported occurrence of each type of assessment, which was demonstrated using Spearman's rank-order correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High confidence levels for a cardiovascular examination were reported among the respondents of this survey. Paramedics have shown good confidence among all areas of a cardiovascular assessment, except with palpating the chest for heaves and thrills. There is an evident link between reported confidence levels and how often these assessments are completed, however there is still room for additional training and research within this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"44-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative study of confidence among paramedics in assessment of the cardiovascular system.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Sweet, Phil Withers\",\"doi\":\"10.29045/14784726.2023.9.8.2.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients presenting to the ambulance services with cardiovascular complaints are common, and as such, represent a notable proportion of paramedic clinical practice. Numerous texts refer to a system-based approach to cardiovascular assessment, however the application by paramedics is scarcely researched. As such, this article aims to quantify paramedic confidence levels regarding an examination of a patient with a cardiovascular complaint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted, recruiting paramedics from one ambulance trust within the United Kingdom and analysing their confidence levels of assessing a patient with a cardiovascular complaint. Paramedics were recruited using purposive sampling and asked to complete an online questionnaire exploring their confidence levels among cardiovascular assessments, which were subsequently quantified to summarise confidence levels expressed by these respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 331 responses across one ambulance service were received in April 2021. Of these, 90.3% (299/331) reported a high level of confidence with the general cardiovascular assessment. Throughout all individual elements of assessment, over 50% of respondents indicated they feel confident with the examination, except when assessing heaves and thrills where 56.2% (185/329) and 55.1% (182/330) of respondents disagreed with feeling confident, respectively. A strong correlation was seen throughout the results between confidence levels and the reported occurrence of each type of assessment, which was demonstrated using Spearman's rank-order correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High confidence levels for a cardiovascular examination were reported among the respondents of this survey. Paramedics have shown good confidence among all areas of a cardiovascular assessment, except with palpating the chest for heaves and thrills. There is an evident link between reported confidence levels and how often these assessments are completed, however there is still room for additional training and research within this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"44-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2023.9.8.2.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2023.9.8.2.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:因心血管不适而向救护车求助的患者很常见,因此在辅助医务人员的临床实践中占有相当大的比例。许多文章都提到了基于系统的心血管评估方法,但对辅助医务人员的应用却鲜有研究。因此,本文旨在量化辅助医务人员对心血管主诉患者进行检查时的信心水平:方法: 我们进行了一项在线横断面调查,从英国一家救护车托管机构招募护理人员,分析他们对心血管主诉患者进行评估的信心水平。调查采用有目的的抽样方式招募救护人员,并要求他们填写一份在线问卷,探讨他们对心血管评估的信心水平,随后对问卷进行量化,以总结这些受访者所表达的信心水平:2021 年 4 月,一个救护车服务机构共收到 331 份回复。其中,90.3%(299/331)的受访者对一般心血管评估表示高度信任。在所有单项评估要素中,50% 以上的受访者表示对检查有信心,但在评估起搏和激动时,分别有 56.2%(185/329)和 55.1%(182/330)的受访者表示没有信心。整个结果显示,信心水平与报告的各类评估发生率之间存在很强的相关性,斯皮尔曼秩相关性证明了这一点:本次调查的受访者对心血管检查的信心水平较高。除了触诊胸部是否有起伏外,医护人员对心血管评估的所有方面都表现出了良好的信心。所报告的信心水平与完成这些评估的频率之间存在明显联系,但在这一领域仍有进一步培训和研究的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A quantitative study of confidence among paramedics in assessment of the cardiovascular system.

Background: Patients presenting to the ambulance services with cardiovascular complaints are common, and as such, represent a notable proportion of paramedic clinical practice. Numerous texts refer to a system-based approach to cardiovascular assessment, however the application by paramedics is scarcely researched. As such, this article aims to quantify paramedic confidence levels regarding an examination of a patient with a cardiovascular complaint.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted, recruiting paramedics from one ambulance trust within the United Kingdom and analysing their confidence levels of assessing a patient with a cardiovascular complaint. Paramedics were recruited using purposive sampling and asked to complete an online questionnaire exploring their confidence levels among cardiovascular assessments, which were subsequently quantified to summarise confidence levels expressed by these respondents.

Results: A total of 331 responses across one ambulance service were received in April 2021. Of these, 90.3% (299/331) reported a high level of confidence with the general cardiovascular assessment. Throughout all individual elements of assessment, over 50% of respondents indicated they feel confident with the examination, except when assessing heaves and thrills where 56.2% (185/329) and 55.1% (182/330) of respondents disagreed with feeling confident, respectively. A strong correlation was seen throughout the results between confidence levels and the reported occurrence of each type of assessment, which was demonstrated using Spearman's rank-order correlation.

Conclusions: High confidence levels for a cardiovascular examination were reported among the respondents of this survey. Paramedics have shown good confidence among all areas of a cardiovascular assessment, except with palpating the chest for heaves and thrills. There is an evident link between reported confidence levels and how often these assessments are completed, however there is still room for additional training and research within this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信