如何测量人类白细胞抗原特异性B细胞。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Delphine Kervella, Alba Torija, Jose M Zúñiga, Oriol Bestard
{"title":"如何测量人类白细胞抗原特异性B细胞。","authors":"Delphine Kervella,&nbsp;Alba Torija,&nbsp;Jose M Zúñiga,&nbsp;Oriol Bestard","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The implementation of highly sensitive immune assays measuring anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has modified alloimmune risk stratification and diagnosis of rejection. Nonetheless, anti-HLA antibodies represent the downstream effector mechanism of the B-cell response. Better characterizing the cellular components of the humoral immune response (including memory B cells (mBCs) and long-lived plasma cells) could help to further stratify the alloimmune risk stratification and enable discovery of new therapeutic targets. Several tests that characterize HLA-specific mBCs, either functionally or phenotypically, have been developed in the last years, showing promising applications as well as some limitations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Functional assays involving ex vivo polyclonal activation of mBC have been refined to allow the detection of HLA-specific mBC capable of producing anti-HLA Abs, using different and complementary detection platforms such as multiplex Fluorospot and single antigen bead assay on culture supernatants. Detection of circulating HLA-specific B cells by flow cytometry remains hindered by the very low frequency of HLA-specific mBC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Technological refinements have allowed the development of tests detecting HLA-specific mBC. Further evaluation of these assays in clinical trials, both for immune risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy (desensitization strategies, rescue therapies for ABMR) are now urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to measure human leukocyte antigen-specific B cells.\",\"authors\":\"Delphine Kervella,&nbsp;Alba Torija,&nbsp;Jose M Zúñiga,&nbsp;Oriol Bestard\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The implementation of highly sensitive immune assays measuring anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has modified alloimmune risk stratification and diagnosis of rejection. Nonetheless, anti-HLA antibodies represent the downstream effector mechanism of the B-cell response. Better characterizing the cellular components of the humoral immune response (including memory B cells (mBCs) and long-lived plasma cells) could help to further stratify the alloimmune risk stratification and enable discovery of new therapeutic targets. Several tests that characterize HLA-specific mBCs, either functionally or phenotypically, have been developed in the last years, showing promising applications as well as some limitations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Functional assays involving ex vivo polyclonal activation of mBC have been refined to allow the detection of HLA-specific mBC capable of producing anti-HLA Abs, using different and complementary detection platforms such as multiplex Fluorospot and single antigen bead assay on culture supernatants. Detection of circulating HLA-specific B cells by flow cytometry remains hindered by the very low frequency of HLA-specific mBC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Technological refinements have allowed the development of tests detecting HLA-specific mBC. Further evaluation of these assays in clinical trials, both for immune risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy (desensitization strategies, rescue therapies for ABMR) are now urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:测量抗人类白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体的高灵敏度免疫测定的实施改变了同种免疫风险分层和排斥反应的诊断。尽管如此,抗HLA抗体代表了B细胞反应的下游效应机制。更好地表征体液免疫反应的细胞成分(包括记忆B细胞(mBCs)和长寿命浆细胞)有助于进一步对同种免疫风险分层进行分层,并能够发现新的治疗靶点。在过去的几年里,已经开发了几种表征HLA特异性mBCs的测试,无论是功能性的还是表型的,显示出有前景的应用以及一些局限性。最近的发现:涉及mBC的离体多克隆激活的功能测定已经被完善,以允许使用不同和互补的检测平台检测能够产生抗HLA Abs的HLA特异性mBC,如培养上清液上的多重荧光点和单抗原珠测定。流式细胞术检测循环HLA特异性B细胞仍然受到HLA特异性mBC频率非常低的阻碍。总结:技术的改进使得检测HLA特异性m BC的测试得以发展。现在迫切需要在临床试验中对这些测定进行进一步评估,包括免疫风险分层和评估治疗效果(脱敏策略、ABMR的抢救疗法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to measure human leukocyte antigen-specific B cells.

Purpose of review: The implementation of highly sensitive immune assays measuring anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has modified alloimmune risk stratification and diagnosis of rejection. Nonetheless, anti-HLA antibodies represent the downstream effector mechanism of the B-cell response. Better characterizing the cellular components of the humoral immune response (including memory B cells (mBCs) and long-lived plasma cells) could help to further stratify the alloimmune risk stratification and enable discovery of new therapeutic targets. Several tests that characterize HLA-specific mBCs, either functionally or phenotypically, have been developed in the last years, showing promising applications as well as some limitations.

Recent findings: Functional assays involving ex vivo polyclonal activation of mBC have been refined to allow the detection of HLA-specific mBC capable of producing anti-HLA Abs, using different and complementary detection platforms such as multiplex Fluorospot and single antigen bead assay on culture supernatants. Detection of circulating HLA-specific B cells by flow cytometry remains hindered by the very low frequency of HLA-specific mBC.

Summary: Technological refinements have allowed the development of tests detecting HLA-specific mBC. Further evaluation of these assays in clinical trials, both for immune risk stratification and to assess treatment efficacy (desensitization strategies, rescue therapies for ABMR) are now urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信