斯里兰卡农村地区的粮食不安全和 COVID-19 对生计的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Food and Nutrition Bulletin Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1177/03795721231197249
Nishmeet Singh, Samuel Scott, Neha Kumar, Gayathri Ramani, Quinn Marshall, Kate Sinclair, Saman Kalupahana, Malika Fernando, Renuka Silva, Amila Perera, Renuka Jayatissa, Deanna Olney
{"title":"斯里兰卡农村地区的粮食不安全和 COVID-19 对生计的影响。","authors":"Nishmeet Singh, Samuel Scott, Neha Kumar, Gayathri Ramani, Quinn Marshall, Kate Sinclair, Saman Kalupahana, Malika Fernando, Renuka Silva, Amila Perera, Renuka Jayatissa, Deanna Olney","doi":"10.1177/03795721231197249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected food security and livelihoods in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aims to assess food insecurity, perceived effects of COVID-19, and coping mechanisms among agriculture-based households in rural Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2 rounds of panel data from phone surveys (n = 1057 households) conducted in 5 districts. Food insecurity (30-day recall), perceived impacts of COVID-19 (6-month recall), and coping mechanisms (6-month recall) were assessed using a household questionnaire. To assess food insecurity, we used the 8-item Food Insecurity Experience Scale. We tested for differences between T1 (baseline: December 2020-February 2021) and T2 (follow-up: July 2021-September 2021) and explored the association between food insecurity and the perceived effect of COVID-19 on income using a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food insecurity was highly prevalent (T1: 75%, T2: 80%) but varied across districts. Most respondents were affected by COVID-19 and/or COVID-19-associated mitigation measures (T1: 84%, T2: 89%). Among affected households, commonly reported impacts included those on income (T1: 77%, T2: 76%), food costs (T1: 84%, T2: 83%), and travel (∼90% in both rounds). Agricultural activities were also adversely affected (T1: 64%, T2: 69%). About half of COVID-19-affected households reported selling livestock or assets to meet basic needs. Households whose income was impacted by COVID-19 were more likely to be food insecure (adjusted odds ratio: 2.56, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Households in rural Sri Lanka experienced food insecurity and livelihood disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional surveys are needed to assess recovery post-COVID-19 and to understand if programs that support livelihoods have been protective.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10725086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Insecurity and Perceived Effects of COVID-19 on Livelihoods in Rural Sri Lanka.\",\"authors\":\"Nishmeet Singh, Samuel Scott, Neha Kumar, Gayathri Ramani, Quinn Marshall, Kate Sinclair, Saman Kalupahana, Malika Fernando, Renuka Silva, Amila Perera, Renuka Jayatissa, Deanna Olney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03795721231197249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected food security and livelihoods in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article aims to assess food insecurity, perceived effects of COVID-19, and coping mechanisms among agriculture-based households in rural Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2 rounds of panel data from phone surveys (n = 1057 households) conducted in 5 districts. Food insecurity (30-day recall), perceived impacts of COVID-19 (6-month recall), and coping mechanisms (6-month recall) were assessed using a household questionnaire. To assess food insecurity, we used the 8-item Food Insecurity Experience Scale. We tested for differences between T1 (baseline: December 2020-February 2021) and T2 (follow-up: July 2021-September 2021) and explored the association between food insecurity and the perceived effect of COVID-19 on income using a logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Food insecurity was highly prevalent (T1: 75%, T2: 80%) but varied across districts. Most respondents were affected by COVID-19 and/or COVID-19-associated mitigation measures (T1: 84%, T2: 89%). Among affected households, commonly reported impacts included those on income (T1: 77%, T2: 76%), food costs (T1: 84%, T2: 83%), and travel (∼90% in both rounds). Agricultural activities were also adversely affected (T1: 64%, T2: 69%). About half of COVID-19-affected households reported selling livestock or assets to meet basic needs. Households whose income was impacted by COVID-19 were more likely to be food insecure (adjusted odds ratio: 2.56, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Households in rural Sri Lanka experienced food insecurity and livelihood disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional surveys are needed to assess recovery post-COVID-19 and to understand if programs that support livelihoods have been protective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Nutrition Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10725086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Nutrition Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721231197249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721231197249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对 COVID-19 大流行如何影响斯里兰卡的粮食安全和生计知之甚少:人们对 COVID-19 大流行如何影响斯里兰卡的粮食安全和生计知之甚少:本文旨在评估斯里兰卡农村地区以农业为基础的家庭的粮食不安全状况、对 COVID-19 影响的认知以及应对机制:我们使用了在 5 个地区进行的两轮电话调查面板数据(n = 1057 个家庭)。通过家庭问卷对粮食不安全(30 天回忆)、COVID-19 的感知影响(6 个月回忆)和应对机制(6 个月回忆)进行了评估。为了评估粮食不安全状况,我们使用了由 8 个项目组成的 "粮食不安全体验量表"。我们检验了 T1(基线:2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 2 月)和 T2(随访:2021 年 7 月至 2021 年 9 月)之间的差异,并使用逻辑回归模型探讨了粮食不安全与 COVID-19 对收入的感知效果之间的关联:粮食不安全问题非常普遍(T1:75%,T2:80%),但各地区之间存在差异。大多数受访者受到 COVID-19 和/或 COVID-19 相关缓解措施的影响(T1:84%,T2:89%)。在受影响的家庭中,普遍报告的影响包括收入(T1:77%,T2:76%)、食品成本(T1:84%,T2:83%)和旅行(两轮均为∼90%)。农业活动也受到不利影响(T1:64%,T2:69%)。约有一半受 COVID-19 影响的家庭表示出售牲畜或资产以满足基本需求。收入受到 COVID-19 影响的家庭更有可能面临粮食不安全问题(调整后的几率比:2.56,P < .001):结论:斯里兰卡农村家庭在 COVID-19 大流行期间经历了粮食不安全和生计动荡。需要进行更多的调查,以评估 COVID-19 后的恢复情况,并了解支持生计的计划是否起到了保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food Insecurity and Perceived Effects of COVID-19 on Livelihoods in Rural Sri Lanka.

Background: Little is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected food security and livelihoods in Sri Lanka.

Objective: This article aims to assess food insecurity, perceived effects of COVID-19, and coping mechanisms among agriculture-based households in rural Sri Lanka.

Methods: We used 2 rounds of panel data from phone surveys (n = 1057 households) conducted in 5 districts. Food insecurity (30-day recall), perceived impacts of COVID-19 (6-month recall), and coping mechanisms (6-month recall) were assessed using a household questionnaire. To assess food insecurity, we used the 8-item Food Insecurity Experience Scale. We tested for differences between T1 (baseline: December 2020-February 2021) and T2 (follow-up: July 2021-September 2021) and explored the association between food insecurity and the perceived effect of COVID-19 on income using a logistic regression model.

Results: Food insecurity was highly prevalent (T1: 75%, T2: 80%) but varied across districts. Most respondents were affected by COVID-19 and/or COVID-19-associated mitigation measures (T1: 84%, T2: 89%). Among affected households, commonly reported impacts included those on income (T1: 77%, T2: 76%), food costs (T1: 84%, T2: 83%), and travel (∼90% in both rounds). Agricultural activities were also adversely affected (T1: 64%, T2: 69%). About half of COVID-19-affected households reported selling livestock or assets to meet basic needs. Households whose income was impacted by COVID-19 were more likely to be food insecure (adjusted odds ratio: 2.56, P < .001).

Conclusions: Households in rural Sri Lanka experienced food insecurity and livelihood disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional surveys are needed to assess recovery post-COVID-19 and to understand if programs that support livelihoods have been protective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Food and Nutrition Bulletin 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信