Igor Ballego-Campos, Stéphani K. V. Bonifácio, Leandro C. S. Assis
{"title":"同源性的统一观点。","authors":"Igor Ballego-Campos, Stéphani K. V. Bonifácio, Leandro C. S. Assis","doi":"10.1111/cla.12541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As it spread through time and into distinct areas of science—from comparative anatomy to evolutionary biology, cladistics, developmental and molecular biology—the homology concept has changed considerably, presenting various meanings. Despite many attempts at developing a comprehensive understanding of the concept, this context-sensitive notion of homology has been a subject of an ongoing debate. Inspired by that and following Kevin de Queiroz and Richard Mayden's view on species concept and delimitation, we presented in this article an attempt to systematize and advance the understanding of the homology problem. Our main goals were: (i) to present a comprehensive checklist of ‘concepts of homology’; (ii) to identify which are really concepts with ontological definitions (theoretically rooted in structural correspondence and common ancestry), and which are, in fact, not concepts, but epistemological (empirical and methodological) criteria of homology delimitation; (iii) to provide a synonymy of the concepts and criteria of homology delimitation; (iv) to present a hierarchy of homology concepts within Hennig's hologenetic system; and (v) to endorse the adoption of a unified view of homology by treating homology as a correspondence of spatio-temporal properties (genetic, epigenetic, developmental and positional) at the level of the individual, species or monophyletic group. We found 59 ‘concepts of homology’ in the literature, from which 34 were categorically treated as concepts, 17 as criteria of homology delimitation, Four were excluded from our treatment, and Müller’s five concepts were rather treated as approaches to homology. Homology concepts and criteria were synonymized based on structural correspondence, replicability, common ancestry, genetic and epigenetic developmental causes, position and optimization. Regarding the synonymy, we conclusively recognized 21 different concepts of homology, and five empirical and four methodological criteria. Hierarchical ontological aspects of homology were systematized under Hennig's hologenetic system, based on the existence of ontogenetic, tokogenetic and phylogenetic levels of homology. The delimitation of tokogenetic and phylogenetic homologies depends on optimization criteria. The unified view of homology is discussed in the context of the ancestral angiosperm flower.</p>","PeriodicalId":50688,"journal":{"name":"Cladistics","volume":"39 5","pages":"398-417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A unified view of homology\",\"authors\":\"Igor Ballego-Campos, Stéphani K. V. Bonifácio, Leandro C. S. Assis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cla.12541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As it spread through time and into distinct areas of science—from comparative anatomy to evolutionary biology, cladistics, developmental and molecular biology—the homology concept has changed considerably, presenting various meanings. Despite many attempts at developing a comprehensive understanding of the concept, this context-sensitive notion of homology has been a subject of an ongoing debate. Inspired by that and following Kevin de Queiroz and Richard Mayden's view on species concept and delimitation, we presented in this article an attempt to systematize and advance the understanding of the homology problem. Our main goals were: (i) to present a comprehensive checklist of ‘concepts of homology’; (ii) to identify which are really concepts with ontological definitions (theoretically rooted in structural correspondence and common ancestry), and which are, in fact, not concepts, but epistemological (empirical and methodological) criteria of homology delimitation; (iii) to provide a synonymy of the concepts and criteria of homology delimitation; (iv) to present a hierarchy of homology concepts within Hennig's hologenetic system; and (v) to endorse the adoption of a unified view of homology by treating homology as a correspondence of spatio-temporal properties (genetic, epigenetic, developmental and positional) at the level of the individual, species or monophyletic group. We found 59 ‘concepts of homology’ in the literature, from which 34 were categorically treated as concepts, 17 as criteria of homology delimitation, Four were excluded from our treatment, and Müller’s five concepts were rather treated as approaches to homology. Homology concepts and criteria were synonymized based on structural correspondence, replicability, common ancestry, genetic and epigenetic developmental causes, position and optimization. Regarding the synonymy, we conclusively recognized 21 different concepts of homology, and five empirical and four methodological criteria. Hierarchical ontological aspects of homology were systematized under Hennig's hologenetic system, based on the existence of ontogenetic, tokogenetic and phylogenetic levels of homology. The delimitation of tokogenetic and phylogenetic homologies depends on optimization criteria. The unified view of homology is discussed in the context of the ancestral angiosperm flower.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cladistics\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"398-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cladistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12541\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cladistics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
随着时间的推移,同源性概念传播到不同的科学领域,从比较解剖学到进化生物学、分支生物学、发育生物学和分子生物学,同源性的概念发生了很大的变化,呈现出不同的含义。尽管许多人试图对同源性这一概念进行全面的理解,但这种对上下文敏感的同源性概念一直是一个持续争论的主题。受此启发,并遵循Kevin de Queiroz和Richard Mayden关于物种概念和划界的观点,本文试图系统化和推进对同源性问题的理解。我们的主要目标是:(i)提出一份“同源性概念”的全面清单;(ii)确定哪些真正是具有本体论定义的概念(理论上植根于结构对应和共同祖先),哪些实际上不是概念,而是同源划界的认识论(经验和方法论)标准;(iii)提供同源性划界概念和标准的同义词;(iv)在Hennig的全基因系统中提出同源概念的层次;以及(v)通过将同源性视为个体、物种或单系群层面的时空特性(遗传、表观遗传、发育和位置)的对应关系,支持采用统一的同源性观点。我们在文献中发现了59个“同源性概念”,其中34个被明确地视为概念,17个被视为同源性划界的标准,4个被排除在我们的处理之外,Müller的5个概念被视为接近同源性的方法。同源性概念和标准是基于结构对应性、可复制性、共同祖先、遗传和表观遗传发育原因、位置和优化而同义的。关于同义词,我们最终承认了21个不同的同源性概念,以及五个经验标准和四个方法标准。同源性的层次本体论方面是在Hennig的全基因系统下,基于同源性的个体发生、标记发生和系统发育水平的存在而系统化的。标记发生同源性和系统发育同源性的界定取决于优化标准。同源性的统一观点是在被子植物祖先花的背景下讨论的。
As it spread through time and into distinct areas of science—from comparative anatomy to evolutionary biology, cladistics, developmental and molecular biology—the homology concept has changed considerably, presenting various meanings. Despite many attempts at developing a comprehensive understanding of the concept, this context-sensitive notion of homology has been a subject of an ongoing debate. Inspired by that and following Kevin de Queiroz and Richard Mayden's view on species concept and delimitation, we presented in this article an attempt to systematize and advance the understanding of the homology problem. Our main goals were: (i) to present a comprehensive checklist of ‘concepts of homology’; (ii) to identify which are really concepts with ontological definitions (theoretically rooted in structural correspondence and common ancestry), and which are, in fact, not concepts, but epistemological (empirical and methodological) criteria of homology delimitation; (iii) to provide a synonymy of the concepts and criteria of homology delimitation; (iv) to present a hierarchy of homology concepts within Hennig's hologenetic system; and (v) to endorse the adoption of a unified view of homology by treating homology as a correspondence of spatio-temporal properties (genetic, epigenetic, developmental and positional) at the level of the individual, species or monophyletic group. We found 59 ‘concepts of homology’ in the literature, from which 34 were categorically treated as concepts, 17 as criteria of homology delimitation, Four were excluded from our treatment, and Müller’s five concepts were rather treated as approaches to homology. Homology concepts and criteria were synonymized based on structural correspondence, replicability, common ancestry, genetic and epigenetic developmental causes, position and optimization. Regarding the synonymy, we conclusively recognized 21 different concepts of homology, and five empirical and four methodological criteria. Hierarchical ontological aspects of homology were systematized under Hennig's hologenetic system, based on the existence of ontogenetic, tokogenetic and phylogenetic levels of homology. The delimitation of tokogenetic and phylogenetic homologies depends on optimization criteria. The unified view of homology is discussed in the context of the ancestral angiosperm flower.
期刊介绍:
Cladistics publishes high quality research papers on systematics, encouraging debate on all aspects of the field, from philosophy, theory and methodology to empirical studies and applications in biogeography, coevolution, conservation biology, ontogeny, genomics and paleontology.
Cladistics is read by scientists working in the research fields of evolution, systematics and integrative biology and enjoys a consistently high position in the ISI® rankings for evolutionary biology.