全口康复中4种切面铸型数字方法转移咬合关系的真实性。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hanqi Gao DDS, PhD , Xiaoqiang Liu DDS, PhD , Ti Zhou DDS , Jianguo Tan DDS, PhD
{"title":"全口康复中4种切面铸型数字方法转移咬合关系的真实性。","authors":"Hanqi Gao DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Liu DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Ti Zhou DDS ,&nbsp;Jianguo Tan DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>An accurate digital workflow for transferring the interocclusal relationship from complete arch diagnostic interim restorations to complete arch tooth preparations<span> is essential in complete mouth rehabilitation. However, research on the accuracy of digital cross-mounting methods is lacking.</span></div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital cross-mounting methods in transferring the interocclusal relationship for complete mouth rehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Maxillary and mandibular anatomic typodonts were used to build complete arch tooth preparations and diagnostic interim restorations for complete mouth rehabilitation in vitro. Four sectional casts were designed: an anterior cast (AR), a posterior cast (PO), a unilateral cast (UL), and a tripod cast (TR). Both extraoral scanning (EOS) and intraoral scanning (IOS) were used to obtain intermediate digital sectional casts, which were cross-registered with diagnostic interim restorations and definitive casts to transfer the interocclusal relationship. Trueness was determined by assessing tooth distance deviation and mandibular 3-dimensional (3D) deviation. Differences among the 4 sectional-cast methods were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and differences between the 2 scanning methods were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences in the trueness of interocclusal relationship transfer were observed among the 4 sectional-cast methods (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Regarding tooth overall distance deviation, TR-EOS found no statistically significant difference compared with PO-EOS (<em>P</em>&gt;.05), but TR-EOS had half the overall distance deviation of PO-EOS. Both TR-EOS and PO-EOS had smaller deviations than the AR-EOS and UL-EOS groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). TR-IOS had a smaller distance deviation than the AR-IOS, PO-IOS, and UL-IOS groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The overall distance deviation of EOS was significantly smaller than that of IOS in the TR and PO groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Regarding mandibular 3D deviation, TR-EOS found no statistically significant difference but had half the root mean square (RMS) of 3D deviation compared with the PO-EOS groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). Both TR-EOS and PO-EOS groups had a smaller RMS than the AR-EOS and groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The TR-IOS group had a smaller RMS than the AR-IOS, PO-IOS, and UL-IOS groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The 3D deviation of EOS was significantly smaller than that of IOS in the PO group (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both EOS and IOS with the tripod sectional-cast digital method accurately transferred the interocclusal relationship for complete mouth rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 2","pages":"Pages 575.e1-575.e10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital methods for transferring the interocclusal relationship in complete mouth rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Hanqi Gao DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiang Liu DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Ti Zhou DDS ,&nbsp;Jianguo Tan DDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>An accurate digital workflow for transferring the interocclusal relationship from complete arch diagnostic interim restorations to complete arch tooth preparations<span> is essential in complete mouth rehabilitation. However, research on the accuracy of digital cross-mounting methods is lacking.</span></div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital cross-mounting methods in transferring the interocclusal relationship for complete mouth rehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Maxillary and mandibular anatomic typodonts were used to build complete arch tooth preparations and diagnostic interim restorations for complete mouth rehabilitation in vitro. Four sectional casts were designed: an anterior cast (AR), a posterior cast (PO), a unilateral cast (UL), and a tripod cast (TR). Both extraoral scanning (EOS) and intraoral scanning (IOS) were used to obtain intermediate digital sectional casts, which were cross-registered with diagnostic interim restorations and definitive casts to transfer the interocclusal relationship. Trueness was determined by assessing tooth distance deviation and mandibular 3-dimensional (3D) deviation. Differences among the 4 sectional-cast methods were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and differences between the 2 scanning methods were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences in the trueness of interocclusal relationship transfer were observed among the 4 sectional-cast methods (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Regarding tooth overall distance deviation, TR-EOS found no statistically significant difference compared with PO-EOS (<em>P</em>&gt;.05), but TR-EOS had half the overall distance deviation of PO-EOS. Both TR-EOS and PO-EOS had smaller deviations than the AR-EOS and UL-EOS groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). TR-IOS had a smaller distance deviation than the AR-IOS, PO-IOS, and UL-IOS groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The overall distance deviation of EOS was significantly smaller than that of IOS in the TR and PO groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Regarding mandibular 3D deviation, TR-EOS found no statistically significant difference but had half the root mean square (RMS) of 3D deviation compared with the PO-EOS groups (<em>P</em>&gt;.05). Both TR-EOS and PO-EOS groups had a smaller RMS than the AR-EOS and groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The TR-IOS group had a smaller RMS than the AR-IOS, PO-IOS, and UL-IOS groups (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). The 3D deviation of EOS was significantly smaller than that of IOS in the PO group (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both EOS and IOS with the tripod sectional-cast digital method accurately transferred the interocclusal relationship for complete mouth rehabilitation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"133 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 575.e1-575.e10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323004791\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323004791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述:一个准确的数字工作流程,将咬合关系从全弓诊断过渡修复转移到全弓牙齿准备,在全口腔康复中是必不可少的。然而,对数字交叉安装方法的精度研究较少。目的:本体外研究的目的是比较4种断面铸造数字交叉安装方法在转移全口康复咬合关系中的准确性。材料和方法:采用上颌和下颌骨解剖型假体构建全牙弓预备体和诊断性临时修复体,用于体外全口康复。设计了四种断面型模:前型(AR)、后型(PO)、单侧型(UL)和三脚架型(TR)。使用口外扫描(EOS)和口内扫描(IOS)获得中间数字断层模型,将其与诊断性临时修复体和确定模型交叉注册以转移咬合关系。通过评估牙齿距离偏差和下颌三维(3D)偏差来确定准确性。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析4种断面铸型扫描方法的差异,采用Mann-Whitney U检验分析2种扫描方法的差异(α= 0.05)。结果:4种切面铸型方法的咬合关系转移正确率差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),但TR-EOS的整体距离偏差是PO-EOS的一半。TR-EOS组和PO-EOS组的差异均小于AR-EOS组和UL-EOS组(p < 0.05)。TR-EOS组和PO-EOS组的RMS均小于AR-EOS组和AR-EOS组(p)。结论:EOS和IOS采用三脚架切面铸造数字法均能准确转移全口咬合关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital methods for transferring the interocclusal relationship in complete mouth rehabilitation

Statement of problem

An accurate digital workflow for transferring the interocclusal relationship from complete arch diagnostic interim restorations to complete arch tooth preparations is essential in complete mouth rehabilitation. However, research on the accuracy of digital cross-mounting methods is lacking.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of 4 sectional-cast digital cross-mounting methods in transferring the interocclusal relationship for complete mouth rehabilitation.

Material and methods

Maxillary and mandibular anatomic typodonts were used to build complete arch tooth preparations and diagnostic interim restorations for complete mouth rehabilitation in vitro. Four sectional casts were designed: an anterior cast (AR), a posterior cast (PO), a unilateral cast (UL), and a tripod cast (TR). Both extraoral scanning (EOS) and intraoral scanning (IOS) were used to obtain intermediate digital sectional casts, which were cross-registered with diagnostic interim restorations and definitive casts to transfer the interocclusal relationship. Trueness was determined by assessing tooth distance deviation and mandibular 3-dimensional (3D) deviation. Differences among the 4 sectional-cast methods were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and differences between the 2 scanning methods were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05).

Results

Significant differences in the trueness of interocclusal relationship transfer were observed among the 4 sectional-cast methods (P<.05). Regarding tooth overall distance deviation, TR-EOS found no statistically significant difference compared with PO-EOS (P>.05), but TR-EOS had half the overall distance deviation of PO-EOS. Both TR-EOS and PO-EOS had smaller deviations than the AR-EOS and UL-EOS groups (P<.05). TR-IOS had a smaller distance deviation than the AR-IOS, PO-IOS, and UL-IOS groups (P<.05). The overall distance deviation of EOS was significantly smaller than that of IOS in the TR and PO groups (P<.05). Regarding mandibular 3D deviation, TR-EOS found no statistically significant difference but had half the root mean square (RMS) of 3D deviation compared with the PO-EOS groups (P>.05). Both TR-EOS and PO-EOS groups had a smaller RMS than the AR-EOS and groups (P<.05). The TR-IOS group had a smaller RMS than the AR-IOS, PO-IOS, and UL-IOS groups (P<.05). The 3D deviation of EOS was significantly smaller than that of IOS in the PO group (P<.05).

Conclusions

Both EOS and IOS with the tripod sectional-cast digital method accurately transferred the interocclusal relationship for complete mouth rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信