低密度骨亲水性表面骨整合的评价:兔临床前研究。

Q2 Medicine
Gustavo da Col Santos Pinto, Isadora Aparecida Ribeiro Dos Reis, Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio, Matusalem Silva, Rafael Silveira Faeda, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Elcio Marcantonio
{"title":"低密度骨亲水性表面骨整合的评价:兔临床前研究。","authors":"Gustavo da Col Santos Pinto,&nbsp;Isadora Aparecida Ribeiro Dos Reis,&nbsp;Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio,&nbsp;Matusalem Silva,&nbsp;Rafael Silveira Faeda,&nbsp;Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira,&nbsp;Elcio Marcantonio","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202305352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of a hydrophilic surface (blasting + acid etching + immersion in isotonic solution) in comparison with that of a control surface (blasting + acid etching) using an experimental model of low-density bone. To perform the study, 24 rabbits were submitted to the installation of 4 implants in the iliac bone bilaterally: 2 implants with a control surface and 2 implants with a hydrophilic surface. The rabbits were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant installation. After euthanasia, one implant from each surface was used to perform the removal torque analysis, and the other implant was used for the execution of non-decalcified histological sections and evaluation of the bone implant contact (% BIC) as well as the fraction of bone tissue area between the implant threads (% BBT). The implants with a hydrophilic surface presented higher %BIC (42.92 ± 2.85% vs. 29.49 ± 10.27%) and % BBT (34.32 ± 8.52% vs. 23.20 ± 6.75%) (p < 0.05) in the 2-week period. Furthermore, the hydrophilic surface presented higher removal torque in the 8-week period (76.13 ± 16.00 Ncm2 vs. 52.77 ± 13.49 Ncm2) (p<0.05). Implants with a hydrophilic surface exhibited acceleration in the process of osseointegration, culminating in greater secondary stability in low-density bone than in implants with a control surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo da Col Santos Pinto,&nbsp;Isadora Aparecida Ribeiro Dos Reis,&nbsp;Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio,&nbsp;Matusalem Silva,&nbsp;Rafael Silveira Faeda,&nbsp;Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira,&nbsp;Elcio Marcantonio\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202305352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of a hydrophilic surface (blasting + acid etching + immersion in isotonic solution) in comparison with that of a control surface (blasting + acid etching) using an experimental model of low-density bone. To perform the study, 24 rabbits were submitted to the installation of 4 implants in the iliac bone bilaterally: 2 implants with a control surface and 2 implants with a hydrophilic surface. The rabbits were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant installation. After euthanasia, one implant from each surface was used to perform the removal torque analysis, and the other implant was used for the execution of non-decalcified histological sections and evaluation of the bone implant contact (% BIC) as well as the fraction of bone tissue area between the implant threads (% BBT). The implants with a hydrophilic surface presented higher %BIC (42.92 ± 2.85% vs. 29.49 ± 10.27%) and % BBT (34.32 ± 8.52% vs. 23.20 ± 6.75%) (p < 0.05) in the 2-week period. Furthermore, the hydrophilic surface presented higher removal torque in the 8-week period (76.13 ± 16.00 Ncm2 vs. 52.77 ± 13.49 Ncm2) (p<0.05). Implants with a hydrophilic surface exhibited acceleration in the process of osseointegration, culminating in greater secondary stability in low-density bone than in implants with a control surface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"66-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是使用低密度骨的实验模型,与对照表面(爆破+酸蚀)相比,评估亲水表面(爆破+酸蚀+浸入等渗溶液)的骨整合。为了进行这项研究,24只兔子被要求在双侧髂骨中安装4个植入物:2个具有控制表面的植入物和2个具有亲水表面的植入体。在植入物安装后2、4和8周对兔子实施安乐死。安乐死后,每个表面的一个植入物用于进行移除扭矩分析,另一个植入体用于执行非脱钙组织学切片和评估骨植入物接触(%BIC)以及植入物螺纹之间的骨组织面积分数(%BBT)。亲水表面植入物在2周内表现出更高的%BIC(42.92±2.85%对29.49±10.27%)和%BBT(34.32±8.52%对23.20±6.75%)(p<0.05)。此外,亲水表面在8周内表现出更高的去除扭矩(76.13±16.00 Ncm2 vs.52.77±13.49 Ncm2)(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.

Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.

Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.

Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of a hydrophilic surface (blasting + acid etching + immersion in isotonic solution) in comparison with that of a control surface (blasting + acid etching) using an experimental model of low-density bone. To perform the study, 24 rabbits were submitted to the installation of 4 implants in the iliac bone bilaterally: 2 implants with a control surface and 2 implants with a hydrophilic surface. The rabbits were euthanized at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant installation. After euthanasia, one implant from each surface was used to perform the removal torque analysis, and the other implant was used for the execution of non-decalcified histological sections and evaluation of the bone implant contact (% BIC) as well as the fraction of bone tissue area between the implant threads (% BBT). The implants with a hydrophilic surface presented higher %BIC (42.92 ± 2.85% vs. 29.49 ± 10.27%) and % BBT (34.32 ± 8.52% vs. 23.20 ± 6.75%) (p < 0.05) in the 2-week period. Furthermore, the hydrophilic surface presented higher removal torque in the 8-week period (76.13 ± 16.00 Ncm2 vs. 52.77 ± 13.49 Ncm2) (p<0.05). Implants with a hydrophilic surface exhibited acceleration in the process of osseointegration, culminating in greater secondary stability in low-density bone than in implants with a control surface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信