伊利诺伊州温尼贝戈县一家工业化工厂火灾后的化学品暴露调查评估。

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Health Pub Date : 2023-03-01
Jasmine Y Nakayama, Krishna Surasi, Lance R Owen, Mark Johnson, Sandra Martell, Abigail Kittler, Peter Lopatin, Sarah Patrick, Caitlin Mertzlufft, D Kevin Horton, Maureen Orr
{"title":"伊利诺伊州温尼贝戈县一家工业化工厂火灾后的化学品暴露调查评估。","authors":"Jasmine Y Nakayama, Krishna Surasi, Lance R Owen, Mark Johnson, Sandra Martell, Abigail Kittler, Peter Lopatin, Sarah Patrick, Caitlin Mertzlufft, D Kevin Horton, Maureen Orr","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a chemical fire, an investigation assessed health effects by using syndromic surveillance to monitor emergency department (ED) visits, a general health survey to assess the general public, and a first responders health survey to assess first responders. A total of four separate multivariable logistic regression models were developed to examine associations between reported exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor with any reported symptom in the general public. Syndromic surveillance identified areas with increased ED visits. Among general health survey respondents, 45.1% (911 out of 2,020) reported at least one symptom. Respondents reporting exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor had 4.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) [3.7, 5.5]), 4.6 (95% CI [3.6, 5.8]), 2.0 (95% CI [1.7, 2.5]), or 5.8 (95% CI [4.7, 7.3]) times the odds of reporting any symptom compared with respondents not reporting exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor, respectively. First responders commonly reported contact with material and being within 1 mi of the fire ≥5 hr; 10 out of 31 of first responders reported at least one symptom. There was high symptom burden reported after the fire. Results from our investigation might assist the directing of public health resources to effectively address immediate community needs and prepare for future incidents.</p>","PeriodicalId":15713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health","volume":"85 7","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Chemical Exposures Investigation After Fire at an Industrial Chemical Facility in Winnebago County, Illinois.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Y Nakayama, Krishna Surasi, Lance R Owen, Mark Johnson, Sandra Martell, Abigail Kittler, Peter Lopatin, Sarah Patrick, Caitlin Mertzlufft, D Kevin Horton, Maureen Orr\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After a chemical fire, an investigation assessed health effects by using syndromic surveillance to monitor emergency department (ED) visits, a general health survey to assess the general public, and a first responders health survey to assess first responders. A total of four separate multivariable logistic regression models were developed to examine associations between reported exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor with any reported symptom in the general public. Syndromic surveillance identified areas with increased ED visits. Among general health survey respondents, 45.1% (911 out of 2,020) reported at least one symptom. Respondents reporting exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor had 4.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) [3.7, 5.5]), 4.6 (95% CI [3.6, 5.8]), 2.0 (95% CI [1.7, 2.5]), or 5.8 (95% CI [4.7, 7.3]) times the odds of reporting any symptom compared with respondents not reporting exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor, respectively. First responders commonly reported contact with material and being within 1 mi of the fire ≥5 hr; 10 out of 31 of first responders reported at least one symptom. There was high symptom burden reported after the fire. Results from our investigation might assist the directing of public health resources to effectively address immediate community needs and prepare for future incidents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\"85 7\",\"pages\":\"8-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一场化学火灾发生后,一项调查通过综合征监测来监控急诊室(ED)就诊情况,通过一般健康调查来评估普通公众的健康状况,以及通过急救人员健康调查来评估急救人员的健康状况,从而评估对健康的影响。共建立了四个独立的多变量逻辑回归模型,以检查公众报告的烟雾、粉尘、碎片或气味暴露与任何报告症状之间的关联。综合监测确定了急诊室就诊人数增加的地区。在一般健康调查的受访者中,45.1%(2,020 位受访者中有 911 位)报告了至少一种症状。与未报告接触过烟雾、灰尘、碎片或气味的受访者相比,报告接触过烟雾、灰尘、碎片或气味的受访者出现任何症状的几率分别是未报告接触过烟雾、灰尘、碎片或气味的受访者的 4.5 倍(95% 置信区间 [3.7, 5.5])、4.6 倍(95% 置信区间 [3.6, 5.8])、2.0 倍(95% 置信区间 [1.7, 2.5])或 5.8 倍(95% 置信区间 [4.7, 7.3])。第一反应者通常报告说接触了物质,并在距离火灾 1 英里范围内逗留了 ≥5 小时;31 名第一反应者中有 10 人报告说至少出现了一种症状。火灾后报告的症状较多。我们的调查结果可能有助于指导公共卫生资源的使用,从而有效地满足社区的即时需求并为未来的事故做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Chemical Exposures Investigation After Fire at an Industrial Chemical Facility in Winnebago County, Illinois.

After a chemical fire, an investigation assessed health effects by using syndromic surveillance to monitor emergency department (ED) visits, a general health survey to assess the general public, and a first responders health survey to assess first responders. A total of four separate multivariable logistic regression models were developed to examine associations between reported exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor with any reported symptom in the general public. Syndromic surveillance identified areas with increased ED visits. Among general health survey respondents, 45.1% (911 out of 2,020) reported at least one symptom. Respondents reporting exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor had 4.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) [3.7, 5.5]), 4.6 (95% CI [3.6, 5.8]), 2.0 (95% CI [1.7, 2.5]), or 5.8 (95% CI [4.7, 7.3]) times the odds of reporting any symptom compared with respondents not reporting exposure to smoke, dust, debris, or odor, respectively. First responders commonly reported contact with material and being within 1 mi of the fire ≥5 hr; 10 out of 31 of first responders reported at least one symptom. There was high symptom burden reported after the fire. Results from our investigation might assist the directing of public health resources to effectively address immediate community needs and prepare for future incidents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health
Journal of Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Health (JEH) is published 10 times per year by the National Environmental Health Association and keeps readers up-to-date on current issues, new research, useful products and services, and employment opportunities. As the only direct link to the complete spectrum of environmental health topics, the JEH reaches more than 20,000 professionals working to solve problems in areas such as air quality, drinking water, food safety and protection, hazardous materials/toxic substances management, institutional environmental health, occupational safety and health, terrorism and all-hazards preparedness, vector control, wastewater management, and water pollution control/water quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信