病毒与人类——疫苗会使天平倾斜吗?

Q3 Medicine
Harish Gupta
{"title":"病毒与人类——疫苗会使天平倾斜吗?","authors":"Harish Gupta","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2022.092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>S Srinivasan in his article \"The vaccine mandates judgment: Some reflections\", in this journal, analyses a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in summer this year [1]. Therein, he underscores significant points of interest, the logic behind them, a few points of contention, their scientific basis and areas where logic defies rationality and prudence. Nevertheless, certain relevant points about vaccination are overlooked in the article. Under the subheading, \"Vaccine mandates and the right to privacy\", the author states that the order \"finally zeroes in on this proposition…and that is that the risk of transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) virus from unvaccinated individuals is almost on par with that from vaccinated persons\". Therefore, when the immunisation does not serve the social purpose of stopping propagation of the infection, why should the authorities mandate people to accept vaccination? This is the argument put forth by the author.</p>","PeriodicalId":35523,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virus versus humanity - Do vaccines tilt the scale?\",\"authors\":\"Harish Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.20529/IJME.2022.092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>S Srinivasan in his article \\\"The vaccine mandates judgment: Some reflections\\\", in this journal, analyses a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in summer this year [1]. Therein, he underscores significant points of interest, the logic behind them, a few points of contention, their scientific basis and areas where logic defies rationality and prudence. Nevertheless, certain relevant points about vaccination are overlooked in the article. Under the subheading, \\\"Vaccine mandates and the right to privacy\\\", the author states that the order \\\"finally zeroes in on this proposition…and that is that the risk of transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) virus from unvaccinated individuals is almost on par with that from vaccinated persons\\\". Therefore, when the immunisation does not serve the social purpose of stopping propagation of the infection, why should the authorities mandate people to accept vaccination? This is the argument put forth by the author.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of medical ethics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of medical ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2022.092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2022.092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

S Srinivasan在本刊的文章“疫苗授权判决:一些反思”中分析了今年夏天印度最高法院的一项判决[1]。在书中,他强调了重要的兴趣点、它们背后的逻辑、一些争论点、它们的科学基础以及逻辑违背理性和审慎的领域。然而,这篇文章忽略了关于疫苗接种的一些相关观点。在题为"疫苗任务和隐私权"的副标题下,提交人指出,命令"最终集中于这一命题。,即未接种疫苗的个人传播严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS-CoV-2)病毒的风险几乎与接种疫苗的人相同"。因此,当免疫接种不能达到阻止感染传播的社会目的时,当局为什么要强制人们接受疫苗接种?这是作者提出的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virus versus humanity - Do vaccines tilt the scale?

S Srinivasan in his article "The vaccine mandates judgment: Some reflections", in this journal, analyses a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in summer this year [1]. Therein, he underscores significant points of interest, the logic behind them, a few points of contention, their scientific basis and areas where logic defies rationality and prudence. Nevertheless, certain relevant points about vaccination are overlooked in the article. Under the subheading, "Vaccine mandates and the right to privacy", the author states that the order "finally zeroes in on this proposition…and that is that the risk of transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) virus from unvaccinated individuals is almost on par with that from vaccinated persons". Therefore, when the immunisation does not serve the social purpose of stopping propagation of the infection, why should the authorities mandate people to accept vaccination? This is the argument put forth by the author.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of medical ethics
Indian journal of medical ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (formerly Issues in Medical Ethics) is a platform for discussion on health care ethics with special reference to the problems of developing countries like India. It hopes to involve all cadres of, and beneficiaries from, this system, and strengthen the hands of those with ethical values and concern for the under-privileged. The journal is owned and published by the Forum for Medical Ethics Society, a not-for-profit, voluntary organisation. The FMES was born out of an effort by a group of concerned doctors to focus attention on the need for ethical norms and practices in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信