权力动机、人格相关性和领导结果:以人为本的方法。

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Zhuo Li, Jennifer Lynch, Tianlu Sun, Qamara Rizkyana, Joey T. Cheng, Alex J. Benson
{"title":"权力动机、人格相关性和领导结果:以人为本的方法。","authors":"Zhuo Li,&nbsp;Jennifer Lynch,&nbsp;Tianlu Sun,&nbsp;Qamara Rizkyana,&nbsp;Joey T. Cheng,&nbsp;Alex J. Benson","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated how these motivations combined within individuals to form unique profiles, and how these different profiles relate to personality traits and team behaviors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dominance, prestige, and leadership motives each play a key role in shaping social success or failure in gaining social rank and influence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We used latent profile analysis across two samples (engineering student project teams, <i>N</i><sub>student</sub> = 1088; working adults, <i>N</i><sub>worker</sub> = 466) to identify profile configurations and how such profiles related to important outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified qualitatively distinct profiles: ultra-dominance profile (prominent dominance motive with high prestige and leadership motives); prestigious leadership profile (moderately high prestige and leadership motives, low dominance motive); and weak social power motive profile (low on all three motives). Individuals with the prestigious leadership profile were more likely to emerge as leaders, compared to those with a weak social power motive profile. People with an ultra-dominance profile scored higher on narcissism and tended to perceive themselves as leaders, despite not being deemed more leader-like by teammates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Using a person-centered approach allowed us to identify three power motive profiles across independent samples and generate insights into how these profiles manifest different social behaviors and outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12882","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power motives, personality correlates, and leadership outcomes: A person-centered approach\",\"authors\":\"Zhuo Li,&nbsp;Jennifer Lynch,&nbsp;Tianlu Sun,&nbsp;Qamara Rizkyana,&nbsp;Joey T. Cheng,&nbsp;Alex J. Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopy.12882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated how these motivations combined within individuals to form unique profiles, and how these different profiles relate to personality traits and team behaviors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dominance, prestige, and leadership motives each play a key role in shaping social success or failure in gaining social rank and influence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used latent profile analysis across two samples (engineering student project teams, <i>N</i><sub>student</sub> = 1088; working adults, <i>N</i><sub>worker</sub> = 466) to identify profile configurations and how such profiles related to important outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified qualitatively distinct profiles: ultra-dominance profile (prominent dominance motive with high prestige and leadership motives); prestigious leadership profile (moderately high prestige and leadership motives, low dominance motive); and weak social power motive profile (low on all three motives). Individuals with the prestigious leadership profile were more likely to emerge as leaders, compared to those with a weak social power motive profile. People with an ultra-dominance profile scored higher on narcissism and tended to perceive themselves as leaders, despite not being deemed more leader-like by teammates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using a person-centered approach allowed us to identify three power motive profiles across independent samples and generate insights into how these profiles manifest different social behaviors and outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12882\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12882\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12882","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 我们研究了这些动机如何在个体内部结合形成独特的特征,以及这些不同特征与个性特征和团队行为的关系:我们研究了这些动机如何在个体内部结合形成独特的特征,以及这些不同的特征与个性特征和团队行为之间的关系:背景:支配动机、声望动机和领导动机在决定社会地位和影响力的成败方面发挥着关键作用:我们对两个样本(工程专业学生项目团队,Nstudent = 1088;在职成年人,Nworker = 466)进行了潜在特征分析,以确定特征配置以及这些特征与重要结果的关系:我们确定了不同的定性特征:超支配特征(支配动机突出,声望和领导动机高);声望领导特征(声望和领导动机中等偏上,支配动机低);社会权力动机弱特征(三种动机都低)。与社会权力动机较弱的人相比,具有威望型领导特征的人更有可能成为领导者。具有超强支配力特征的人在自恋方面得分较高,并倾向于认为自己是领导者,尽管队友并不认为他们更像领导者:以人为本的方法使我们能够在独立样本中识别出三种权力动机特征,并深入了解这些特征如何表现出不同的社会行为和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Power motives, personality correlates, and leadership outcomes: A person-centered approach

Power motives, personality correlates, and leadership outcomes: A person-centered approach

Objective

We investigated how these motivations combined within individuals to form unique profiles, and how these different profiles relate to personality traits and team behaviors.

Background

Dominance, prestige, and leadership motives each play a key role in shaping social success or failure in gaining social rank and influence.

Method

We used latent profile analysis across two samples (engineering student project teams, Nstudent = 1088; working adults, Nworker = 466) to identify profile configurations and how such profiles related to important outcomes.

Results

We identified qualitatively distinct profiles: ultra-dominance profile (prominent dominance motive with high prestige and leadership motives); prestigious leadership profile (moderately high prestige and leadership motives, low dominance motive); and weak social power motive profile (low on all three motives). Individuals with the prestigious leadership profile were more likely to emerge as leaders, compared to those with a weak social power motive profile. People with an ultra-dominance profile scored higher on narcissism and tended to perceive themselves as leaders, despite not being deemed more leader-like by teammates.

Conclusion

Using a person-centered approach allowed us to identify three power motive profiles across independent samples and generate insights into how these profiles manifest different social behaviors and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信