早期子宫颈癌的治疗有什么新进展?

IF 2.5 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Camilla Di Dio, Ilham Azenkoud, Angelo Trezza, Emanuele Lentini, Tullio Golia D'Augè, Ilaria Cuccu, Giorgia Di Bartolomeo, Ilaria Firulli, Andrea Canicchio, Ludovica Sgamba, Ludovico Muzii
{"title":"早期子宫颈癌的治疗有什么新进展?","authors":"Camilla Di Dio,&nbsp;Ilham Azenkoud,&nbsp;Angelo Trezza,&nbsp;Emanuele Lentini,&nbsp;Tullio Golia D'Augè,&nbsp;Ilaria Cuccu,&nbsp;Giorgia Di Bartolomeo,&nbsp;Ilaria Firulli,&nbsp;Andrea Canicchio,&nbsp;Ludovica Sgamba,&nbsp;Ludovico Muzii","doi":"10.5114/pm.2023.127774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gold standard of treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy, in agreement with the entire scientific community. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the minimally invasive approach. Several studies have suggested that the minimally invasive approach could improve surgical and perioperative outcomes. Because of these findings, ESCO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines state that a \"minimally invasive approach is favoured\" in comparison with open surgery, as a grade B recommendation. Because of the lack of a grade A recommendation, this randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial evaluated open vs. minimally invasive approach in the early stage. It demonstrated an increase in mortality among patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, revolutionizing current thinking on the primary surgical approach to early cervical cancer. The aim of this study is to analyse which is the best treatment for early cervical cancer and which approach is the most effective at the moment. Further studies are needed to state with certainty the appropriateness of the treatments offered to patients with early cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55643,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","volume":"22 2","pages":"87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/29/MR-22-50764.PMC10477763.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early-stage cervical cancer treatment - what's new?\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Di Dio,&nbsp;Ilham Azenkoud,&nbsp;Angelo Trezza,&nbsp;Emanuele Lentini,&nbsp;Tullio Golia D'Augè,&nbsp;Ilaria Cuccu,&nbsp;Giorgia Di Bartolomeo,&nbsp;Ilaria Firulli,&nbsp;Andrea Canicchio,&nbsp;Ludovica Sgamba,&nbsp;Ludovico Muzii\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pm.2023.127774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gold standard of treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy, in agreement with the entire scientific community. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the minimally invasive approach. Several studies have suggested that the minimally invasive approach could improve surgical and perioperative outcomes. Because of these findings, ESCO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines state that a \\\"minimally invasive approach is favoured\\\" in comparison with open surgery, as a grade B recommendation. Because of the lack of a grade A recommendation, this randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial evaluated open vs. minimally invasive approach in the early stage. It demonstrated an increase in mortality among patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, revolutionizing current thinking on the primary surgical approach to early cervical cancer. The aim of this study is to analyse which is the best treatment for early cervical cancer and which approach is the most effective at the moment. Further studies are needed to state with certainty the appropriateness of the treatments offered to patients with early cervical cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Menopauzalny\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"87-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/29/MR-22-50764.PMC10477763.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Menopauzalny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.127774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.127774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗早期宫颈癌患者的黄金标准是根治性子宫切除术,这与整个科学界一致。在过去十年中,越来越多的证据支持微创方法。一些研究表明,微创入路可以改善手术和围手术期的预后。由于这些发现,ESCO/ESTRO/ESP指南指出,与开放手术相比,“微创手术更受欢迎”,作为B级推荐。由于缺乏a级推荐,这项随机的宫颈癌腹腔镜入路试验在早期评估了开放与微创入路。研究表明,在接受微创手术治疗的患者中,死亡率有所增加,这彻底改变了目前对早期宫颈癌的主要手术方法的看法。本研究的目的是分析早期宫颈癌的最佳治疗方法和目前最有效的治疗方法。需要进一步的研究来确定为早期宫颈癌患者提供的治疗是否适当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early-stage cervical cancer treatment - what's new?

The gold standard of treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy, in agreement with the entire scientific community. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the minimally invasive approach. Several studies have suggested that the minimally invasive approach could improve surgical and perioperative outcomes. Because of these findings, ESCO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines state that a "minimally invasive approach is favoured" in comparison with open surgery, as a grade B recommendation. Because of the lack of a grade A recommendation, this randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial evaluated open vs. minimally invasive approach in the early stage. It demonstrated an increase in mortality among patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, revolutionizing current thinking on the primary surgical approach to early cervical cancer. The aim of this study is to analyse which is the best treatment for early cervical cancer and which approach is the most effective at the moment. Further studies are needed to state with certainty the appropriateness of the treatments offered to patients with early cervical cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Przeglad Menopauzalny
Przeglad Menopauzalny OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Menopausal Review is a scientific bimonthly aimed at gynecologists and endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信