围产期悲痛的护理。对临床实践中的态度和知识进行系统和批判性的回顾。

Pablo Santiago Moreno Tirado , Eugenia Gil García , Lorena Tarriño Concejero
{"title":"围产期悲痛的护理。对临床实践中的态度和知识进行系统和批判性的回顾。","authors":"Pablo Santiago Moreno Tirado ,&nbsp;Eugenia Gil García ,&nbsp;Lorena Tarriño Concejero","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To review and synthesize the available evidence on the attitudes and knowledge of nurses regarding the perinatal grief of the parents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review<span><span> of original articles published from January 2016 to February 2023 without language limit in the Scopus, PubMed, Cinahl, </span>PsycINFO<span>, ScienceDirect<span> and Web Of Science databases was carried out. The Prisma Statement methodological framework was used for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The entire process was carried out in pairs, with discrepancies being resolved by a third reviewer. The quality of the articles was evaluated following the CASPe criteria (Critical Appraisal Skills Program Spanish).</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve articles were obtained in this review after applying the inclusion criteria, of which. Except for one cross-sectional quantitative study (8.33%), the rest were qualitative studies carried out through interviews (75%) or discussion groups (16.66%). It is highlighted that there are different biopsychosocial problems related to the care needs demanded by the family and that, due to poor training or culture of the health professional, are not adequately addressed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The studies found show various resources to adequately attend to perinatal grief, there being discrepancies in relation to allowing or not allowing the body of the deceased baby to be shown and/or taken; There are also disagreements regarding whether the healthcare team should base its practice on protocols or theories such as the Kubler-Ross theory of grief. Most of the studies (75%) consider that more training and awareness is necessary, contemplating the biopsychosocial nature of the user.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":"33 5","pages":"Pages 327-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing care in perinatal grief. A systematic and critical review of attitudes and knowledge in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Santiago Moreno Tirado ,&nbsp;Eugenia Gil García ,&nbsp;Lorena Tarriño Concejero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcle.2023.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To review and synthesize the available evidence on the attitudes and knowledge of nurses regarding the perinatal grief of the parents.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review<span><span> of original articles published from January 2016 to February 2023 without language limit in the Scopus, PubMed, Cinahl, </span>PsycINFO<span>, ScienceDirect<span> and Web Of Science databases was carried out. The Prisma Statement methodological framework was used for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The entire process was carried out in pairs, with discrepancies being resolved by a third reviewer. The quality of the articles was evaluated following the CASPe criteria (Critical Appraisal Skills Program Spanish).</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve articles were obtained in this review after applying the inclusion criteria, of which. Except for one cross-sectional quantitative study (8.33%), the rest were qualitative studies carried out through interviews (75%) or discussion groups (16.66%). It is highlighted that there are different biopsychosocial problems related to the care needs demanded by the family and that, due to poor training or culture of the health professional, are not adequately addressed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The studies found show various resources to adequately attend to perinatal grief, there being discrepancies in relation to allowing or not allowing the body of the deceased baby to be shown and/or taken; There are also disagreements regarding whether the healthcare team should base its practice on protocols or theories such as the Kubler-Ross theory of grief. Most of the studies (75%) consider that more training and awareness is necessary, contemplating the biopsychosocial nature of the user.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 327-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147923000486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445147923000486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾和综合护士对父母围产期悲痛的态度和知识的现有证据。方法:对2016年1月至2023年2月在Scopus、PubMed、Cinahl、PsycINFO、ScienceDirect和Web of Science数据库中发表的无语言限制的原创文章进行系统综述。Prisma Statement方法框架用于系统审查和荟萃分析。整个过程是成对进行的,差异由第三位评审员解决。文章的质量按照CASPe标准(西班牙语批判性评估技能计划)进行评估。结果:在应用纳入标准后,本次审查获得了12篇文章,其中。除了一项横断面定量研究(8.33%)外,其余均为通过访谈(75%)或讨论小组(16.66%)进行的定性研究。值得强调的是,与家庭所需的护理需求有关的生物-心理-社会问题各不相同,由于卫生专业人员的培训或文化较差,这些问题没有得到充分解决。讨论:研究表明,有各种资源可以充分照顾围产期的悲痛,在允许或不允许展示和/或取下已故婴儿的尸体方面存在差异;对于医疗团队是否应该将其实践建立在协议或Kubler-Ross悲伤理论等理论的基础上,也存在分歧。大多数研究(75%)认为需要更多的培训和意识,考虑到用户的生物心理社会性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing care in perinatal grief. A systematic and critical review of attitudes and knowledge in clinical practice

Aim

To review and synthesize the available evidence on the attitudes and knowledge of nurses regarding the perinatal grief of the parents.

Methods

A systematic review of original articles published from January 2016 to February 2023 without language limit in the Scopus, PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect and Web Of Science databases was carried out. The Prisma Statement methodological framework was used for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The entire process was carried out in pairs, with discrepancies being resolved by a third reviewer. The quality of the articles was evaluated following the CASPe criteria (Critical Appraisal Skills Program Spanish).

Results

Twelve articles were obtained in this review after applying the inclusion criteria, of which. Except for one cross-sectional quantitative study (8.33%), the rest were qualitative studies carried out through interviews (75%) or discussion groups (16.66%). It is highlighted that there are different biopsychosocial problems related to the care needs demanded by the family and that, due to poor training or culture of the health professional, are not adequately addressed.

Discussion

The studies found show various resources to adequately attend to perinatal grief, there being discrepancies in relation to allowing or not allowing the body of the deceased baby to be shown and/or taken; There are also disagreements regarding whether the healthcare team should base its practice on protocols or theories such as the Kubler-Ross theory of grief. Most of the studies (75%) consider that more training and awareness is necessary, contemplating the biopsychosocial nature of the user.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信