[IEHT还是住院治疗?-关于研究人群和指标治疗的住院等效家庭治疗的多中心AKtiV研究的初步结果]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2138-8920
Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Peter Brieger, Jürgen Timm, Tamara Waldmann, Lasse Fischer, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Martin Holzke, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Johannes Hamann, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Andreas Bechdolf
{"title":"[IEHT还是住院治疗?-关于研究人群和指标治疗的住院等效家庭治疗的多中心AKtiV研究的初步结果]。","authors":"Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Peter Brieger, Jürgen Timm, Tamara Waldmann, Lasse Fischer, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Martin Holzke, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Johannes Hamann, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Andreas Bechdolf","doi":"10.1055/a-2138-8920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The quasi-experimental AKtiV study investigates the effects inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT). This paper describes the study population based on demographic and clinical parameters at baseline and compares the index treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a period of 12 months 200 IEHT users were included in the intervention group (IG) and 200 inpatients were included in the control group (CG). The comparability of the two groups was ensured by propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to the PSM variables, IG and CG did not differ significantly from each other variables at study inclusion. The duration of the index treatment was significantly longer in the IG (M=37.2 days) compared to the CG (M=27.9 days; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The similarity of the two groups enables comparisons over 12 months, investigating IEHT effects on long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"407-414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[IEHT or inpatient treatment? - First results of the multicenter AKtiV study on inpatient-equivalent home treatment regarding the study population and index treatment].\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Sebastian von Peter, Gerhard Längle, Peter Brieger, Jürgen Timm, Tamara Waldmann, Lasse Fischer, Svenja Raschmann, Julian Schwarz, Martin Holzke, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Johannes Hamann, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Johanna Baumgardt, Andreas Bechdolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2138-8920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The quasi-experimental AKtiV study investigates the effects inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT). This paper describes the study population based on demographic and clinical parameters at baseline and compares the index treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a period of 12 months 200 IEHT users were included in the intervention group (IG) and 200 inpatients were included in the control group (CG). The comparability of the two groups was ensured by propensity score matching (PSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to the PSM variables, IG and CG did not differ significantly from each other variables at study inclusion. The duration of the index treatment was significantly longer in the IG (M=37.2 days) compared to the CG (M=27.9 days; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The similarity of the two groups enables comparisons over 12 months, investigating IEHT effects on long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"407-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2138-8920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2138-8920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准实验性AKtiV研究探讨住院等效家庭治疗(IEHT)的效果。本文描述了基于人口统计学和临床参数基线的研究人群,并比较了指标治疗。方法:将200名IEHT使用者作为干预组(IG), 200名住院患者作为对照组(CG),为期12个月。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)确保两组的可比性。结果:除PSM变量外,IG和CG在研究纳入时与其他变量无显著差异。实验组的指数治疗时间(M=37.2天)明显长于对照组(M=27.9天;结论:两组的相似性可以进行为期12个月的比较,调查IEHT对长期结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[IEHT or inpatient treatment? - First results of the multicenter AKtiV study on inpatient-equivalent home treatment regarding the study population and index treatment].

Aim: The quasi-experimental AKtiV study investigates the effects inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT). This paper describes the study population based on demographic and clinical parameters at baseline and compares the index treatment.

Methods: Over a period of 12 months 200 IEHT users were included in the intervention group (IG) and 200 inpatients were included in the control group (CG). The comparability of the two groups was ensured by propensity score matching (PSM).

Results: In addition to the PSM variables, IG and CG did not differ significantly from each other variables at study inclusion. The duration of the index treatment was significantly longer in the IG (M=37.2 days) compared to the CG (M=27.9 days; p<0.001).

Conclusion: The similarity of the two groups enables comparisons over 12 months, investigating IEHT effects on long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信