双能计算机断层扫描中能量依赖引起的剂量不确定性。

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daisuke Kawahara, Takatoshi Toyoda, Kazushi Yokomachi, Chikako Fujioka, Yasushi Nagata
{"title":"双能计算机断层扫描中能量依赖引起的剂量不确定性。","authors":"Daisuke Kawahara,&nbsp;Takatoshi Toyoda,&nbsp;Kazushi Yokomachi,&nbsp;Chikako Fujioka,&nbsp;Yasushi Nagata","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2023.128682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the absolute dose uncertainty at 2 different energies and for the large and small bowtie filters in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Measurements were performed using DECT at 80 kV and 140 kilovoltage peak (kVp), and single-energy computed tomography (CT) at 120 kV. The absolute dose was calculated from the mass-energy absorption obtained from the half-value layer (HVL) of aluminium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference in the water-to-air ratio of the mean mass energy-absorption coefficients at 80 kV and 140 kV was 2.0% for the small bow-tie filter and 3.0% for the large bow-tie filter. At lower tube voltages, the difference in the absorbed dose with the large and small bow-tie filters was larger.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The absolute dose uncertainty due to energy dependence was 3.0%, which could be reduced with single-energy beams at 120 kV or by using the average effective energy measurement with dual-energy beams.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/38/PJR-88-50851.PMC10317008.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose uncertainty due to energy dependence in dual-energy computed tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kawahara,&nbsp;Takatoshi Toyoda,&nbsp;Kazushi Yokomachi,&nbsp;Chikako Fujioka,&nbsp;Yasushi Nagata\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2023.128682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the absolute dose uncertainty at 2 different energies and for the large and small bowtie filters in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Measurements were performed using DECT at 80 kV and 140 kilovoltage peak (kVp), and single-energy computed tomography (CT) at 120 kV. The absolute dose was calculated from the mass-energy absorption obtained from the half-value layer (HVL) of aluminium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference in the water-to-air ratio of the mean mass energy-absorption coefficients at 80 kV and 140 kV was 2.0% for the small bow-tie filter and 3.0% for the large bow-tie filter. At lower tube voltages, the difference in the absorbed dose with the large and small bow-tie filters was larger.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The absolute dose uncertainty due to energy dependence was 3.0%, which could be reduced with single-energy beams at 120 kV or by using the average effective energy measurement with dual-energy beams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/38/PJR-88-50851.PMC10317008.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.128682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.128682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)中大小领结滤光片在2种不同能量下的绝对剂量不确定度。材料和方法:使用80 kV和140 kV电压峰值(kVp)的DECT和120 kV的单能量计算机断层扫描(CT)进行测量。从铝的半值层(HVL)得到的质能吸收计算绝对剂量。结果:80 kV和140 kV平均质量吸能系数的水空气比,小领结过滤器的差值为2.0%,大领结过滤器的差值为3.0%。在较低的管电压下,大领结滤波器和小领结滤波器的吸收剂量差异较大。结论:能量依赖引起的绝对剂量不确定度为3.0%,可通过120 kV单能量束流或双能量束流平均有效能量测量来降低剂量不确定度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dose uncertainty due to energy dependence in dual-energy computed tomography.

Dose uncertainty due to energy dependence in dual-energy computed tomography.

Dose uncertainty due to energy dependence in dual-energy computed tomography.

Dose uncertainty due to energy dependence in dual-energy computed tomography.

Purpose: To evaluate the absolute dose uncertainty at 2 different energies and for the large and small bowtie filters in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT).

Material and methods: Measurements were performed using DECT at 80 kV and 140 kilovoltage peak (kVp), and single-energy computed tomography (CT) at 120 kV. The absolute dose was calculated from the mass-energy absorption obtained from the half-value layer (HVL) of aluminium.

Results: The difference in the water-to-air ratio of the mean mass energy-absorption coefficients at 80 kV and 140 kV was 2.0% for the small bow-tie filter and 3.0% for the large bow-tie filter. At lower tube voltages, the difference in the absorbed dose with the large and small bow-tie filters was larger.

Conclusions: The absolute dose uncertainty due to energy dependence was 3.0%, which could be reduced with single-energy beams at 120 kV or by using the average effective energy measurement with dual-energy beams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信