中国样本生活日常烦恼量表的心理测量性质及测量不变性。

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/01632787231164782

Kang Liu, Xiaofang Yu, Yan Cai, Dongbo Tu

{"title":"中国样本生活日常烦恼量表的心理测量性质及测量不变性。","authors":"Kang Liu, Xiaofang Yu, Yan Cai, Dongbo Tu","doi":"10.1177/01632787231164782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Daily hassles have a larger effect on our health and well-being than those major events in daily life. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the LIVES Daily Hassles Scale (LIVES-DHS) in Chinese samples, which consisted of 815 people at work aged between 20 and 60 years old. The results of both Explanatory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the five-factor model solution was better than other solutions, which supported the original structure of LIVES-DHS. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five subdimensions varied between.721 and.818, with the entire scale of.920, and McDonald's <math><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math> values of the five subdimensions varied between.716 and.821, with the entire scale of.936. The results also showed the support for measurement invariance of the five-factor model across different groups, which is the first to offer evidence for configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance of LIVES-DHS across gender, age and educational groups.","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":"46 3","pages":"277-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the LIVES Daily Hassles Scale in Chinese Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Kang Liu, Xiaofang Yu, Yan Cai, Dongbo Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01632787231164782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Daily hassles have a larger effect on our health and well-being than those major events in daily life. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the LIVES Daily Hassles Scale (LIVES-DHS) in Chinese samples, which consisted of 815 people at work aged between 20 and 60 years old. The results of both Explanatory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the five-factor model solution was better than other solutions, which supported the original structure of LIVES-DHS. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five subdimensions varied between.721 and.818, with the entire scale of.920, and McDonald's <math><mrow><mi>ω</mi></mrow></math> values of the five subdimensions varied between.716 and.821, with the entire scale of.936. The results also showed the support for measurement invariance of the five-factor model across different groups, which is the first to offer evidence for configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance of LIVES-DHS across gender, age and educational groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"277-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231164782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231164782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

与日常生活中的重大事件相比，日常琐事对我们的健康和幸福的影响更大。本研究旨在评估生活日常烦恼量表(LIVES- dhs)的心理测量特性及其测量不变性，该量表由815名年龄在20 - 60岁之间的中国工作人员组成。解释因子分析和验证性因子分析结果均表明，五因子模型方案优于其他方案，支持了livess - dhs的原始结构。五个子维度的Cronbach's alpha系数在。721年,。818，整个规模为。920，五个子维度的麦当劳ω值在。716年,。821，整个比例尺为936。研究结果还表明，五因素模型在不同群体间支持测量不变性，这是首次为不同性别、年龄和教育群体间的livess - dhs的构形、度量、标量和严格不变性提供证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the LIVES Daily Hassles Scale in Chinese Samples.

Daily hassles have a larger effect on our health and well-being than those major events in daily life. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the LIVES Daily Hassles Scale (LIVES-DHS) in Chinese samples, which consisted of 815 people at work aged between 20 and 60 years old. The results of both Explanatory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the five-factor model solution was better than other solutions, which supported the original structure of LIVES-DHS. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the five subdimensions varied between.721 and.818, with the entire scale of.920, and McDonald's $ω$ values of the five subdimensions varied between.716 and.821, with the entire scale of.936. The results also showed the support for measurement invariance of the five-factor model across different groups, which is the first to offer evidence for configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance of LIVES-DHS across gender, age and educational groups.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Evaluation & the Health Professions 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days