强脉冲光治疗皮肤利什曼病有效吗?

Amirhossein Siadat, Hamid Galehdari, Zabiholah Shahmoradi, Fariba Iraji, Azadeh Zolfaghari, Nazli Ansari
{"title":"强脉冲光治疗皮肤利什曼病有效吗?","authors":"Amirhossein Siadat,&nbsp;Hamid Galehdari,&nbsp;Zabiholah Shahmoradi,&nbsp;Fariba Iraji,&nbsp;Azadeh Zolfaghari,&nbsp;Nazli Ansari","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_410_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/d6/ABR-12-125.PMC10331534.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?\",\"authors\":\"Amirhossein Siadat,&nbsp;Hamid Galehdari,&nbsp;Zabiholah Shahmoradi,&nbsp;Fariba Iraji,&nbsp;Azadeh Zolfaghari,&nbsp;Nazli Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abr.abr_410_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/d6/ABR-12-125.PMC10331534.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮肤利什曼病是一种常见的寄生虫病,在许多国家流行。目前还没有完全有效的治疗方法,但五价锑化合物被认为是主要的治疗方法。不同类型的激光已用于治疗CL的不同的成功,但据我们所知,没有发表的论文关于使用强脉冲光(IPL)治疗CL。材料和方法:在这项随机、单盲临床试验研究中,我们比较了局部注射葡聚糖酶与局部注射葡聚糖酶加每周IPL治疗54例确诊皮肤利什曼病的疗效,为期最多8周。结果:联合治疗虽无统计学意义,但明显优于单药治疗(P > 0.05)。然而,IPL联合局部内葡聚糖治疗的愈合速度明显高于单纯葡聚糖治疗。两组均未见副作用。讨论:为了更好地评估IPL的疗效,建议更多的患者和使用不同的IPL滤镜进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?

Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL.

Materials and methods: In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial.

Results: Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (P > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups.

Discussion: To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信