用于查找Ovid medline和Embase中药物不良反应研究的更新的通用搜索过滤器可以检索高达90%的相关研究

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Su Golder PhD, Kelly Farrah MLIS, Monika Mierzwinski-Urban MLIS, Beth Barker BSc (hons), Anna Rama
{"title":"用于查找Ovid medline和Embase中药物不良反应研究的更新的通用搜索过滤器可以检索高达90%的相关研究","authors":"Su Golder PhD,&nbsp;Kelly Farrah MLIS,&nbsp;Monika Mierzwinski-Urban MLIS,&nbsp;Beth Barker BSc (hons),&nbsp;Anna Rama","doi":"10.1111/hir.12441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The most current objectively derived search filters for adverse <i>drug</i> effects are 15 years old and other strategies have not been developed and tested empirically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To develop and validate search filters to retrieve evidence on adverse drug effects from Ovid <span>medline</span> and Ovid Embase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified systematic reviews of adverse drug effects in Epistemonikos. From these reviews, we collated their included studies which we then randomly divided into three tests and one validation set of records. We constructed a search strategy to maximise relative recall using word frequency analysis with test set one. This search strategy was then refined using test sets two and three and validated on the final set of records.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 107 systematic reviews which met our inclusion criteria, 1948 unique included studies were available from <span>medline</span> and 1980 from Embase.</p>\n \n <p>Generic adverse drug effects searches in <span>medline</span> and Embase achieved 90% and 89% relative recall, respectively. When specific adverse effects terms were added recall was improved.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We have derived and validated search filters that retrieve around 90% of records with adverse drug effects data in <span>medline</span> and Embase. The addition of specific adverse effects terms is required to achieve higher recall.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47580,"journal":{"name":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hir.12441","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updated generic search filters for finding studies of adverse drug effects in Ovid medline and Embase may retrieve up to 90% of relevant studies\",\"authors\":\"Su Golder PhD,&nbsp;Kelly Farrah MLIS,&nbsp;Monika Mierzwinski-Urban MLIS,&nbsp;Beth Barker BSc (hons),&nbsp;Anna Rama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hir.12441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most current objectively derived search filters for adverse <i>drug</i> effects are 15 years old and other strategies have not been developed and tested empirically.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To develop and validate search filters to retrieve evidence on adverse drug effects from Ovid <span>medline</span> and Ovid Embase.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified systematic reviews of adverse drug effects in Epistemonikos. From these reviews, we collated their included studies which we then randomly divided into three tests and one validation set of records. We constructed a search strategy to maximise relative recall using word frequency analysis with test set one. This search strategy was then refined using test sets two and three and validated on the final set of records.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 107 systematic reviews which met our inclusion criteria, 1948 unique included studies were available from <span>medline</span> and 1980 from Embase.</p>\\n \\n <p>Generic adverse drug effects searches in <span>medline</span> and Embase achieved 90% and 89% relative recall, respectively. When specific adverse effects terms were added recall was improved.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We have derived and validated search filters that retrieve around 90% of records with adverse drug effects data in <span>medline</span> and Embase. The addition of specific adverse effects terms is required to achieve higher recall.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Information and Libraries Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hir.12441\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Information and Libraries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hir.12441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hir.12441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前最客观的药物不良反应搜索过滤器已有15年历史,其他策略尚未开发和实证检验。目的开发并验证从Ovid medline和Ovid Embase中检索药物不良反应证据的搜索过滤器。方法对Epistemonikos的不良反应进行系统评价。从这些综述中,我们整理了纳入的研究,然后随机分为三个测试和一个验证记录集。我们构建了一个搜索策略,以最大限度地提高相对召回使用词频分析与测试集一。然后使用测试集2和3对该搜索策略进行细化,并在最终的记录集上进行验证。结果在符合纳入标准的107项系统评价中,有1948项独特的纳入研究来自medline, 1980项来自Embase。在medline和Embase中搜索仿制药不良反应的相对召回率分别达到90%和89%。当添加特定的不良反应时,召回率提高。结论我们推导并验证了检索过滤器,检索了medline和Embase中90%的药物不良反应数据记录。为了达到更高的召回率,需要添加特定的不良反应条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Updated generic search filters for finding studies of adverse drug effects in Ovid medline and Embase may retrieve up to 90% of relevant studies

Updated generic search filters for finding studies of adverse drug effects in Ovid medline and Embase may retrieve up to 90% of relevant studies

Background

The most current objectively derived search filters for adverse drug effects are 15 years old and other strategies have not been developed and tested empirically.

Objective

To develop and validate search filters to retrieve evidence on adverse drug effects from Ovid medline and Ovid Embase.

Methods

We identified systematic reviews of adverse drug effects in Epistemonikos. From these reviews, we collated their included studies which we then randomly divided into three tests and one validation set of records. We constructed a search strategy to maximise relative recall using word frequency analysis with test set one. This search strategy was then refined using test sets two and three and validated on the final set of records.

Results

Of 107 systematic reviews which met our inclusion criteria, 1948 unique included studies were available from medline and 1980 from Embase.

Generic adverse drug effects searches in medline and Embase achieved 90% and 89% relative recall, respectively. When specific adverse effects terms were added recall was improved.

Conclusion

We have derived and validated search filters that retrieve around 90% of records with adverse drug effects data in medline and Embase. The addition of specific adverse effects terms is required to achieve higher recall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Information and Libraries Journal
Health Information and Libraries Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Health Information and Libraries Journal (HILJ) provides practitioners, researchers, and students in library and health professions an international and interdisciplinary forum. Its objectives are to encourage discussion and to disseminate developments at the frontiers of information management and libraries. A major focus is communicating practices that are evidence based both in managing information and in supporting health care. The Journal encompasses: - Identifying health information needs and uses - Managing programmes and services in the changing health environment - Information technology and applications in health - Educating and training health information professionals - Outreach to health user groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信