艰难梭菌PCR Tcdb循环阈值预测毒素EIA阳性,但不预测感染的严重程度。

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Regan Mah , Kerstin Locher , Theodore S. Steiner , Aleksandra Stefanovic
{"title":"艰难梭菌PCR Tcdb循环阈值预测毒素EIA阳性,但不预测感染的严重程度。","authors":"Regan Mah ,&nbsp;Kerstin Locher ,&nbsp;Theodore S. Steiner ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Stefanovic","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diagnosis of <span><em>Clostridioides difficile</em><em> Infection</em></span> (CDI) entails compatible clinical presentation and laboratory findings. We evaluated real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) cycle threshold (C<sub>T</sub>) as a predictor for disease severity and TcdB enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Inpatients or emergency department patients who tested positive for </span><em>tcdB</em><span> gene by PCR were evaluated. Patients’ stools underwent testing for GDH<span> and TcdA/B by EIA. Medical health records were reviewed for demographic, clinical presentation, laboratory, treatment and outcome data. Severity of CDI was calculated using various severity score indexes.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median C<sub>T</sub> of cases was 32.05 ± 5.45. The optimal cut-off for predicting toxin EIA positivity and severe CDI based on chart review was 32.6 and 29.8, respectively, with the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.60 respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>C<sub>T</sub> value was an acceptable predictor for EIA toxin but less so for clinical severity. Our study potentially supports a diagnostic algorithm including C<sub>T</sub> value to reduce the number of EIA toxin assays performed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8050,"journal":{"name":"Anaerobe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clostridioides difficile PCR Tcdb Cycle Threshold predicts toxin EIA positivity but not severity of infection\",\"authors\":\"Regan Mah ,&nbsp;Kerstin Locher ,&nbsp;Theodore S. Steiner ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Stefanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diagnosis of <span><em>Clostridioides difficile</em><em> Infection</em></span> (CDI) entails compatible clinical presentation and laboratory findings. We evaluated real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) cycle threshold (C<sub>T</sub>) as a predictor for disease severity and TcdB enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Inpatients or emergency department patients who tested positive for </span><em>tcdB</em><span> gene by PCR were evaluated. Patients’ stools underwent testing for GDH<span> and TcdA/B by EIA. Medical health records were reviewed for demographic, clinical presentation, laboratory, treatment and outcome data. Severity of CDI was calculated using various severity score indexes.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median C<sub>T</sub> of cases was 32.05 ± 5.45. The optimal cut-off for predicting toxin EIA positivity and severe CDI based on chart review was 32.6 and 29.8, respectively, with the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.60 respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>C<sub>T</sub> value was an acceptable predictor for EIA toxin but less so for clinical severity. Our study potentially supports a diagnostic algorithm including C<sub>T</sub> value to reduce the number of EIA toxin assays performed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaerobe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaerobe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000641\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaerobe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996423000641","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的诊断需要兼容的临床表现和实验室结果。我们评估了实时聚合酶链式反应(qPCR)循环阈值(CT)作为疾病严重程度和TcdB酶免疫测定(EIA)结果的预测指标。方法:对经PCR检测tcdB基因阳性的住院或急诊病人进行检测。通过EIA对患者的粪便进行GDH和TcdA/B检测。对医疗健康记录进行了人口统计学、临床表现、实验室、治疗和结果数据审查。CDI的严重程度使用各种严重程度评分指数进行计算。结果:病例中位CT值为32.05±5.45。基于图表审查,预测毒素EIA阳性和严重CDI的最佳截止值分别为32.6和29.8,受试者-操作者特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.74和0.60。结论:CT值是一个可接受的预测EIA毒素的指标,但对临床严重程度的预测作用较弱。我们的研究可能支持一种包括CT值的诊断算法,以减少进行EIA毒素检测的次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clostridioides difficile PCR Tcdb Cycle Threshold predicts toxin EIA positivity but not severity of infection

Background

Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) entails compatible clinical presentation and laboratory findings. We evaluated real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) cycle threshold (CT) as a predictor for disease severity and TcdB enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results.

Methods

Inpatients or emergency department patients who tested positive for tcdB gene by PCR were evaluated. Patients’ stools underwent testing for GDH and TcdA/B by EIA. Medical health records were reviewed for demographic, clinical presentation, laboratory, treatment and outcome data. Severity of CDI was calculated using various severity score indexes.

Results

The median CT of cases was 32.05 ± 5.45. The optimal cut-off for predicting toxin EIA positivity and severe CDI based on chart review was 32.6 and 29.8, respectively, with the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.60 respectively.

Conclusion

CT value was an acceptable predictor for EIA toxin but less so for clinical severity. Our study potentially supports a diagnostic algorithm including CT value to reduce the number of EIA toxin assays performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaerobe
Anaerobe 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Anaerobe is essential reading for those who wish to remain at the forefront of discoveries relating to life processes of strictly anaerobes. The journal is multi-disciplinary, and provides a unique forum for those investigating anaerobic organisms that cause infections in humans and animals, as well as anaerobes that play roles in microbiomes or environmental processes. Anaerobe publishes reviews, mini reviews, original research articles, notes and case reports. Relevant topics fall into the broad categories of anaerobes in human and animal diseases, anaerobes in the microbiome, anaerobes in the environment, diagnosis of anaerobes in clinical microbiology laboratories, molecular biology, genetics, pathogenesis, toxins and antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信