控制态度量表-修订版-巴西版。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001035
Priscila de Araujo Kaji, Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini, Daniele Cristina Bosco Aprile, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Vinicius Batista Santos, Camila Takao Lopes
{"title":"控制态度量表-修订版-巴西版。","authors":"Priscila de Araujo Kaji, Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini, Daniele Cristina Bosco Aprile, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Vinicius Batista Santos, Camila Takao Lopes","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure demands self-care skills and behaviors that can be negatively impacted by a low level of perceived control (PC), a belief about having the necessary resources to deal with negative events. Having valid and reliable instruments to measure PC is important to support interventions that improve self-care and related outcomes. The Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) was developed in the United States to measure PC in cardiac conditions. In Brazil, there are no instruments available to measure this construct.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to translate and adapt the CAS-R to the Brazilian population and to assess the content validity of the adapted version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CAS-R was translated, back-translated, and assessed by an expert committee for linguistic equivalences. An agreement > 80% was considered adequate. Content validity (clarity, theoretical relevance, and practical pertinence) was assessed by both an expert professional panel (n = 6-8) and a panel of patients with heart failure (n = 40). A content validity coefficient > 0.70 was considered acceptable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translations to Brazilian Portuguese were considered consistent with the original CAS-R. In the third round of linguistic equivalence assessment, all items achieved acceptable agreement, except for 2 items. After modifications to the instrument to achieve adequate equivalences, the adapted version had a final content validity coefficient of 0.93. Most patients were able to understand the instrument.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAS-R-Brazilian version is equivalent to the original CAS-R and has satisfactory evidence of content validity. Additional psychometric testing will be performed to allow for the assessment of PC in individuals with heart failure in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"561-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control Attitudes Scale-Revised-Brazilian Version.\",\"authors\":\"Priscila de Araujo Kaji, Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini, Daniele Cristina Bosco Aprile, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Vinicius Batista Santos, Camila Takao Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure demands self-care skills and behaviors that can be negatively impacted by a low level of perceived control (PC), a belief about having the necessary resources to deal with negative events. Having valid and reliable instruments to measure PC is important to support interventions that improve self-care and related outcomes. The Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) was developed in the United States to measure PC in cardiac conditions. In Brazil, there are no instruments available to measure this construct.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of this study were to translate and adapt the CAS-R to the Brazilian population and to assess the content validity of the adapted version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CAS-R was translated, back-translated, and assessed by an expert committee for linguistic equivalences. An agreement > 80% was considered adequate. Content validity (clarity, theoretical relevance, and practical pertinence) was assessed by both an expert professional panel (n = 6-8) and a panel of patients with heart failure (n = 40). A content validity coefficient > 0.70 was considered acceptable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The translations to Brazilian Portuguese were considered consistent with the original CAS-R. In the third round of linguistic equivalence assessment, all items achieved acceptable agreement, except for 2 items. After modifications to the instrument to achieve adequate equivalences, the adapted version had a final content validity coefficient of 0.93. Most patients were able to understand the instrument.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAS-R-Brazilian version is equivalent to the original CAS-R and has satisfactory evidence of content validity. Additional psychometric testing will be performed to allow for the assessment of PC in individuals with heart failure in Brazil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"561-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭要求患者具备自我护理技能和行为,而低水平的感知控制(PC)会对患者的自我护理技能和行为产生负面影响,感知控制是指患者认为自己有必要的资源来应对负面事件。拥有有效、可靠的工具来测量感知控制对于支持改善自我护理和相关结果的干预措施非常重要。控制态度量表修订版(CAS-R)由美国开发,用于测量心脏病患者的控制感。在巴西,还没有可用的工具来测量这一结构:本研究的目的是翻译 CAS-R 并使其适应巴西人群,同时评估改编版 CAS-R 的内容效度:对 CAS-R 进行翻译、回译,并由一个专家委员会对其语言等效性进行评估。一致性大于 80% 即为充分。内容效度(清晰度、理论相关性和实用性)由专业专家小组(6-8 人)和心衰患者小组(40 人)共同评估。内容效度系数大于 0.70 即可接受:结果:巴西葡萄牙语译文与 CAS-R 原文一致。在第三轮语言等效性评估中,除两个项目外,所有项目的一致性均可接受。为达到充分的等效性而对问卷进行修改后,改编版的最终内容效度系数为 0.93。大多数患者都能理解该工具:结论:巴西版 CAS-R 与原版 CAS-R 相当,其内容效度令人满意。我们还将进行更多的心理测试,以便对巴西的心力衰竭患者进行 PC 评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control Attitudes Scale-Revised-Brazilian Version.

Background: Heart failure demands self-care skills and behaviors that can be negatively impacted by a low level of perceived control (PC), a belief about having the necessary resources to deal with negative events. Having valid and reliable instruments to measure PC is important to support interventions that improve self-care and related outcomes. The Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) was developed in the United States to measure PC in cardiac conditions. In Brazil, there are no instruments available to measure this construct.

Objective: The aims of this study were to translate and adapt the CAS-R to the Brazilian population and to assess the content validity of the adapted version.

Methods: The CAS-R was translated, back-translated, and assessed by an expert committee for linguistic equivalences. An agreement > 80% was considered adequate. Content validity (clarity, theoretical relevance, and practical pertinence) was assessed by both an expert professional panel (n = 6-8) and a panel of patients with heart failure (n = 40). A content validity coefficient > 0.70 was considered acceptable.

Results: The translations to Brazilian Portuguese were considered consistent with the original CAS-R. In the third round of linguistic equivalence assessment, all items achieved acceptable agreement, except for 2 items. After modifications to the instrument to achieve adequate equivalences, the adapted version had a final content validity coefficient of 0.93. Most patients were able to understand the instrument.

Conclusions: The CAS-R-Brazilian version is equivalent to the original CAS-R and has satisfactory evidence of content validity. Additional psychometric testing will be performed to allow for the assessment of PC in individuals with heart failure in Brazil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信