氯乙酯喷雾低温麻醉与5%利多卡因凝胶减轻口腔局部麻醉注射疼痛:一项随机临床(对照)试验

Q4 Dentistry
Hira Abbasi, Faiza Ali, Hina Aslam, Muhammad Sharjeel Khan, Muhammad Waqas, Abhishek Lal
{"title":"氯乙酯喷雾低温麻醉与5%利多卡因凝胶减轻口腔局部麻醉注射疼痛:一项随机临床(对照)试验","authors":"Hira Abbasi,&nbsp;Faiza Ali,&nbsp;Hina Aslam,&nbsp;Muhammad Sharjeel Khan,&nbsp;Muhammad Waqas,&nbsp;Abhishek Lal","doi":"10.34172/joddd.2023.37041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numbing the area of oral mucosa with cold application prior to administration of regional anesthesia has been widely used by various dentists in alleviating pain caused by needle prick. Cryoanesthesia using Endo-ice as topical anesthesia has been studied as a replacement to prevail the fallibility of topical anaesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate and compare effectiveness of ethyl chloride spray with 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating buccal anesthesia injection pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total of 90 outpatients were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 - cryotherapy with ethyl chloride at the anesthetic site preceding before administration of local anesthesia; Group 2 - topical application of 5% LIDOCAINE GEL preceding before administration of local anesthesia; and group 3 - control that did not receive any topical agent preceding before administration of local anesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to document pain immediately after injection prick.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About comparison of pain scores, significant difference was found between group 1 (ethyl chloride) and group 2 (topical lidocaine) patients (<i>P</i>=0.001). For group 1, about 15 (50%) patients suffered from mild pain, followed by 14 (46.67%) patients suffering from moderate pain. However, majority of the 21 (70%) patients in group 2 suffered from moderate pain. All the patients in group 3 suffered from severe pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Importance of alleviating fear of needle injection phobia amongst patients is of paramount importance. Ethyl chloride was found to be more effective than topical lidocaine in alleviating needle injection pain before administration of local anesthetic injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"17 1","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462915/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryoanesthesia with ethyl chloride spray versus 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating oral local anesthetic injection pain for buccal anaesthesia: A randomized clinical (controlled) trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hira Abbasi,&nbsp;Faiza Ali,&nbsp;Hina Aslam,&nbsp;Muhammad Sharjeel Khan,&nbsp;Muhammad Waqas,&nbsp;Abhishek Lal\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/joddd.2023.37041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numbing the area of oral mucosa with cold application prior to administration of regional anesthesia has been widely used by various dentists in alleviating pain caused by needle prick. Cryoanesthesia using Endo-ice as topical anesthesia has been studied as a replacement to prevail the fallibility of topical anaesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate and compare effectiveness of ethyl chloride spray with 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating buccal anesthesia injection pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Total of 90 outpatients were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 - cryotherapy with ethyl chloride at the anesthetic site preceding before administration of local anesthesia; Group 2 - topical application of 5% LIDOCAINE GEL preceding before administration of local anesthesia; and group 3 - control that did not receive any topical agent preceding before administration of local anesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to document pain immediately after injection prick.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About comparison of pain scores, significant difference was found between group 1 (ethyl chloride) and group 2 (topical lidocaine) patients (<i>P</i>=0.001). For group 1, about 15 (50%) patients suffered from mild pain, followed by 14 (46.67%) patients suffering from moderate pain. However, majority of the 21 (70%) patients in group 2 suffered from moderate pain. All the patients in group 3 suffered from severe pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Importance of alleviating fear of needle injection phobia amongst patients is of paramount importance. Ethyl chloride was found to be more effective than topical lidocaine in alleviating needle injection pain before administration of local anesthetic injection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"40-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.37041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.37041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:局部麻醉前用冷敷麻醉口腔黏膜区域已被许多牙医广泛应用于减轻针刺引起的疼痛。研究了以恩多冰作为表面麻醉的低温麻醉,以替代表面麻醉的不稳定性。本研究旨在评价和比较5%利多卡因凝胶与氯乙酯喷雾缓解口腔麻醉注射疼痛的效果。方法:90例门诊患者随机分为3组:1组:局麻前麻醉部位用氯乙酯冷冻治疗;2组:局麻前局部应用5%利多卡因凝胶;第三组为对照组,局部麻醉前未使用任何外用药物。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录注射后即刻疼痛。结果:疼痛评分比较,1组(乙基氯)与2组(局部利多卡因)患者疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。组1中,轻度疼痛约15例(50%),中度疼痛14例(46.67%)。然而,在第二组的21例患者中,大多数(70%)出现了中度疼痛。第三组患者均出现剧烈疼痛。结论:减轻患者对针头注射恐惧症的恐惧至关重要。氯乙酯比局部利多卡因更有效地缓解局麻注射前的针痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cryoanesthesia with ethyl chloride spray versus 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating oral local anesthetic injection pain for buccal anaesthesia: A randomized clinical (controlled) trial.

Cryoanesthesia with ethyl chloride spray versus 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating oral local anesthetic injection pain for buccal anaesthesia: A randomized clinical (controlled) trial.

Cryoanesthesia with ethyl chloride spray versus 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating oral local anesthetic injection pain for buccal anaesthesia: A randomized clinical (controlled) trial.

Cryoanesthesia with ethyl chloride spray versus 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating oral local anesthetic injection pain for buccal anaesthesia: A randomized clinical (controlled) trial.

Background: Numbing the area of oral mucosa with cold application prior to administration of regional anesthesia has been widely used by various dentists in alleviating pain caused by needle prick. Cryoanesthesia using Endo-ice as topical anesthesia has been studied as a replacement to prevail the fallibility of topical anaesthetics. This study aimed to evaluate and compare effectiveness of ethyl chloride spray with 5% lidocaine gel in alleviating buccal anesthesia injection pain.

Methods: Total of 90 outpatients were randomly divided into 3 groups as follows: Group 1 - cryotherapy with ethyl chloride at the anesthetic site preceding before administration of local anesthesia; Group 2 - topical application of 5% LIDOCAINE GEL preceding before administration of local anesthesia; and group 3 - control that did not receive any topical agent preceding before administration of local anesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to document pain immediately after injection prick.

Results: About comparison of pain scores, significant difference was found between group 1 (ethyl chloride) and group 2 (topical lidocaine) patients (P=0.001). For group 1, about 15 (50%) patients suffered from mild pain, followed by 14 (46.67%) patients suffering from moderate pain. However, majority of the 21 (70%) patients in group 2 suffered from moderate pain. All the patients in group 3 suffered from severe pain.

Conclusion: Importance of alleviating fear of needle injection phobia amongst patients is of paramount importance. Ethyl chloride was found to be more effective than topical lidocaine in alleviating needle injection pain before administration of local anesthetic injection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信