回顾性验证土耳其队列中出生后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)和科罗拉多早产儿视网膜病变(CO-ROP)模型。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Dilbade Yildiz Ekinci, Havvanur Bayraktar, Ozlem Leyla Sero, Nilufer Okur
{"title":"回顾性验证土耳其队列中出生后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)和科罗拉多早产儿视网膜病变(CO-ROP)模型。","authors":"Dilbade Yildiz Ekinci,&nbsp;Havvanur Bayraktar,&nbsp;Ozlem Leyla Sero,&nbsp;Nilufer Okur","doi":"10.24953/turkjped.2022.843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity (CO-ROP) models in predicting the risk of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants at a tertiary ROP diagnostic and treatment center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The G-ROP and CO-ROP models were applied to the study group using the data obtained. The sensitivity and specificity of both models were then calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-six infants were included in the study. When the G-ROP model was applied to the study group, the model`s sensitivity at detecting any stage ROP was 88.7%, while it was 93.3% for the treated group. The specificity of the model was 10.9% for any stage ROP, and 11.7% for the treated group. For the CO-ROP model in the same study group, the sensitivity at detecting any stage ROP was 87.3%, while it was 100% for the treated group. The CO-ROP model's specificity was 40% for any stage ROP, and 27.9% for the treated group. When cardiac pathology criteria were introduced to both models, the sensitivity of the G-ROP and CO-ROP models increased to 94.4% and 97.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was found that the G-ROP and CO-ROP models are simple and effective models for predicting any degree of ROP development, but that they are unable to be 100% accurate. When the models were modified by introducing cardiac pathology criteria, it was observed that they began to produce more accurate results. Studies with larger groups are needed in order to assess the applicability of the modified criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":49409,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"65 3","pages":"398-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective validation of the postnatal growth and retinopathy of prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado retinopathy of prematurity (CO-ROP) models in a Turkish cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Dilbade Yildiz Ekinci,&nbsp;Havvanur Bayraktar,&nbsp;Ozlem Leyla Sero,&nbsp;Nilufer Okur\",\"doi\":\"10.24953/turkjped.2022.843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity (CO-ROP) models in predicting the risk of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants at a tertiary ROP diagnostic and treatment center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The G-ROP and CO-ROP models were applied to the study group using the data obtained. The sensitivity and specificity of both models were then calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-six infants were included in the study. When the G-ROP model was applied to the study group, the model`s sensitivity at detecting any stage ROP was 88.7%, while it was 93.3% for the treated group. The specificity of the model was 10.9% for any stage ROP, and 11.7% for the treated group. For the CO-ROP model in the same study group, the sensitivity at detecting any stage ROP was 87.3%, while it was 100% for the treated group. The CO-ROP model's specificity was 40% for any stage ROP, and 27.9% for the treated group. When cardiac pathology criteria were introduced to both models, the sensitivity of the G-ROP and CO-ROP models increased to 94.4% and 97.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was found that the G-ROP and CO-ROP models are simple and effective models for predicting any degree of ROP development, but that they are unable to be 100% accurate. When the models were modified by introducing cardiac pathology criteria, it was observed that they began to produce more accurate results. Studies with larger groups are needed in order to assess the applicability of the modified criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"398-405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是探讨在三级早产儿视网膜病变诊断和治疗中心,早产儿出生后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)和科罗拉多早产儿视网膜病变(CO-ROP)模型在预测早产儿早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)风险中的有效性。方法:实验组采用G-ROP和CO-ROP模型。然后计算两种模型的敏感性和特异性。结果:126名婴儿被纳入研究。G-ROP模型应用于研究组时,模型检测各阶段ROP的敏感性为88.7%,治疗组为93.3%。模型的特异性为10.9%,治疗组为11.7%。同一研究组CO-ROP模型检测各阶段ROP的敏感性为87.3%,治疗组为100%。对于任何阶段的ROP, CO-ROP模型的特异性为40%,治疗组为27.9%。当引入心脏病理标准时,G-ROP和CO-ROP模型的敏感性分别提高到94.4%和97.2%。结论:G-ROP和CO-ROP模型是预测任何程度ROP发展的简单有效的模型,但不能100%准确。当模型通过引入心脏病理标准进行修改时,观察到它们开始产生更准确的结果。为了评估修改后的标准的适用性,需要对更大的群体进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective validation of the postnatal growth and retinopathy of prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado retinopathy of prematurity (CO-ROP) models in a Turkish cohort.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity (CO-ROP) models in predicting the risk of Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants at a tertiary ROP diagnostic and treatment center.

Methods: The G-ROP and CO-ROP models were applied to the study group using the data obtained. The sensitivity and specificity of both models were then calculated.

Results: One hundred and twenty-six infants were included in the study. When the G-ROP model was applied to the study group, the model`s sensitivity at detecting any stage ROP was 88.7%, while it was 93.3% for the treated group. The specificity of the model was 10.9% for any stage ROP, and 11.7% for the treated group. For the CO-ROP model in the same study group, the sensitivity at detecting any stage ROP was 87.3%, while it was 100% for the treated group. The CO-ROP model's specificity was 40% for any stage ROP, and 27.9% for the treated group. When cardiac pathology criteria were introduced to both models, the sensitivity of the G-ROP and CO-ROP models increased to 94.4% and 97.2%, respectively.

Conclusions: It was found that the G-ROP and CO-ROP models are simple and effective models for predicting any degree of ROP development, but that they are unable to be 100% accurate. When the models were modified by introducing cardiac pathology criteria, it was observed that they began to produce more accurate results. Studies with larger groups are needed in order to assess the applicability of the modified criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is a multidisciplinary, peer reviewed, open access journal that seeks to publish research to advance the field of Pediatrics. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, review of the literature, short communications, clinicopathological exercises and letter to the editor in the field of pediatrics. Articles published in this journal are evaluated in an independent and unbiased, double blinded peer-reviewed fashion by an advisory committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信