颅骨血管转录组比较研究

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Translational Stroke Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s12975-023-01186-w
Jianing Zhang, Jee-Yeon Ryu, Selena-Rae Tirado, Lawrence D Dickinson, Aviva Abosch, M Ali Aziz-Sultan, Alan S Boulos, Daniel L Barrow, H Hunt Batjer, Tamar R Binyamin, Spiros L Blackburn, Edward F Chang, P Roc Chen, Geoffrey P Colby, G Rees Cosgrove, Carlos A David, Arthur L Day, Rebecca D Folkerth, Kai U Frerichs, Brian M Howard, Behnam R Jahromi, Mika Niemela, Steven G Ojemann, Nirav J Patel, R Mark Richardson, Xiangen Shi, Edison P Valle-Giler, Anthony C Wang, Babu G Welch, Ziv Williams, Edie E Zusman, Scott T Weiss, Rose Du
{"title":"颅骨血管转录组比较研究","authors":"Jianing Zhang, Jee-Yeon Ryu, Selena-Rae Tirado, Lawrence D Dickinson, Aviva Abosch, M Ali Aziz-Sultan, Alan S Boulos, Daniel L Barrow, H Hunt Batjer, Tamar R Binyamin, Spiros L Blackburn, Edward F Chang, P Roc Chen, Geoffrey P Colby, G Rees Cosgrove, Carlos A David, Arthur L Day, Rebecca D Folkerth, Kai U Frerichs, Brian M Howard, Behnam R Jahromi, Mika Niemela, Steven G Ojemann, Nirav J Patel, R Mark Richardson, Xiangen Shi, Edison P Valle-Giler, Anthony C Wang, Babu G Welch, Ziv Williams, Edie E Zusman, Scott T Weiss, Rose Du","doi":"10.1007/s12975-023-01186-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In genetic studies of cerebrovascular diseases, the optimal vessels to use as controls remain unclear. Our goal is to compare the transcriptomic profiles among 3 different types of control vessels: superficial temporal artery (STA), middle cerebral arteries (MCA), and arteries from the circle of Willis obtained from autopsies (AU). We examined the transcriptomic profiles of STA, MCA, and AU using RNAseq. We also investigated the effects of using these control groups on the results of the comparisons between aneurysms and the control arteries. Our study showed that when comparing pathological cerebral arteries to control groups, all control groups presented similar responses in the activation of immunological processes, the regulation of intracellular signaling pathways, and extracellular matrix productions, despite their intrinsic biological differences. When compared to STA, AU exhibited upregulation of stress and apoptosis genes, whereas MCA showed upregulation of genes associated with tRNA/rRNA processing. Moreover, our results suggest that the matched case-control study design, which involves control STA samples collected from the same subjects of matched aneurysm samples in our study, can improve the identification of non-inherited disease-associated genes. Given the challenges associated with obtaining fresh intracranial arteries from healthy individuals, our study suggests that using MCA, AU, or paired STA samples as controls are feasible strategies for future large-scale studies investigating cerebral vasculopathies. However, the intrinsic differences of each type of control should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. With the limitations of each control type, it may be most optimal to use multiple tissues as controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":"1108-1122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Transcriptomic Comparative Study of Cranial Vasculature.\",\"authors\":\"Jianing Zhang, Jee-Yeon Ryu, Selena-Rae Tirado, Lawrence D Dickinson, Aviva Abosch, M Ali Aziz-Sultan, Alan S Boulos, Daniel L Barrow, H Hunt Batjer, Tamar R Binyamin, Spiros L Blackburn, Edward F Chang, P Roc Chen, Geoffrey P Colby, G Rees Cosgrove, Carlos A David, Arthur L Day, Rebecca D Folkerth, Kai U Frerichs, Brian M Howard, Behnam R Jahromi, Mika Niemela, Steven G Ojemann, Nirav J Patel, R Mark Richardson, Xiangen Shi, Edison P Valle-Giler, Anthony C Wang, Babu G Welch, Ziv Williams, Edie E Zusman, Scott T Weiss, Rose Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12975-023-01186-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In genetic studies of cerebrovascular diseases, the optimal vessels to use as controls remain unclear. Our goal is to compare the transcriptomic profiles among 3 different types of control vessels: superficial temporal artery (STA), middle cerebral arteries (MCA), and arteries from the circle of Willis obtained from autopsies (AU). We examined the transcriptomic profiles of STA, MCA, and AU using RNAseq. We also investigated the effects of using these control groups on the results of the comparisons between aneurysms and the control arteries. Our study showed that when comparing pathological cerebral arteries to control groups, all control groups presented similar responses in the activation of immunological processes, the regulation of intracellular signaling pathways, and extracellular matrix productions, despite their intrinsic biological differences. When compared to STA, AU exhibited upregulation of stress and apoptosis genes, whereas MCA showed upregulation of genes associated with tRNA/rRNA processing. Moreover, our results suggest that the matched case-control study design, which involves control STA samples collected from the same subjects of matched aneurysm samples in our study, can improve the identification of non-inherited disease-associated genes. Given the challenges associated with obtaining fresh intracranial arteries from healthy individuals, our study suggests that using MCA, AU, or paired STA samples as controls are feasible strategies for future large-scale studies investigating cerebral vasculopathies. However, the intrinsic differences of each type of control should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. With the limitations of each control type, it may be most optimal to use multiple tissues as controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Stroke Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1108-1122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Stroke Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-023-01186-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-023-01186-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在脑血管疾病的基因研究中,用作对照的最佳血管仍不明确。我们的目标是比较三种不同类型对照血管的转录组特征:颞浅动脉(STA)、大脑中动脉(MCA)和从尸体解剖中获得的威利斯圈动脉(AU)。我们使用 RNAseq 研究了 STA、MCA 和 AU 的转录组特征。我们还研究了使用这些对照组对动脉瘤与对照动脉比较结果的影响。我们的研究表明,在将病理脑动脉与对照组进行比较时,所有对照组在免疫过程的激活、细胞内信号通路的调节和细胞外基质的生成方面都表现出相似的反应,尽管它们之间存在内在的生物学差异。与 STA 相比,AU 表现出应激和细胞凋亡基因的上调,而 MCA 则表现出与 tRNA/rRNA 处理相关基因的上调。此外,我们的研究结果表明,配对病例对照研究设计(即从与我们研究中的配对动脉瘤样本相同的受试者中收集对照 STA 样本)可提高非遗传性疾病相关基因的鉴定水平。鉴于从健康人身上获取新鲜颅内动脉所面临的挑战,我们的研究表明,使用 MCA、AU 或配对的 STA 样本作为对照是未来大规模研究脑血管病的可行策略。然而,在解释结果时应考虑到每种对照类型的内在差异。鉴于每种对照类型的局限性,使用多种组织作为对照可能是最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Transcriptomic Comparative Study of Cranial Vasculature.

A Transcriptomic Comparative Study of Cranial Vasculature.

In genetic studies of cerebrovascular diseases, the optimal vessels to use as controls remain unclear. Our goal is to compare the transcriptomic profiles among 3 different types of control vessels: superficial temporal artery (STA), middle cerebral arteries (MCA), and arteries from the circle of Willis obtained from autopsies (AU). We examined the transcriptomic profiles of STA, MCA, and AU using RNAseq. We also investigated the effects of using these control groups on the results of the comparisons between aneurysms and the control arteries. Our study showed that when comparing pathological cerebral arteries to control groups, all control groups presented similar responses in the activation of immunological processes, the regulation of intracellular signaling pathways, and extracellular matrix productions, despite their intrinsic biological differences. When compared to STA, AU exhibited upregulation of stress and apoptosis genes, whereas MCA showed upregulation of genes associated with tRNA/rRNA processing. Moreover, our results suggest that the matched case-control study design, which involves control STA samples collected from the same subjects of matched aneurysm samples in our study, can improve the identification of non-inherited disease-associated genes. Given the challenges associated with obtaining fresh intracranial arteries from healthy individuals, our study suggests that using MCA, AU, or paired STA samples as controls are feasible strategies for future large-scale studies investigating cerebral vasculopathies. However, the intrinsic differences of each type of control should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. With the limitations of each control type, it may be most optimal to use multiple tissues as controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信