通过二维和三维经食道超声心动图测量新型左房阑尾闭合装置的验证研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Echocardiography Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s12574-023-00619-7
Sachiyo Ono, Takeshi Maruo, Shunsuke Kubo, Kazushige Kadota
{"title":"通过二维和三维经食道超声心动图测量新型左房阑尾闭合装置的验证研究。","authors":"Sachiyo Ono, Takeshi Maruo, Shunsuke Kubo, Kazushige Kadota","doi":"10.1007/s12574-023-00619-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.</p>","PeriodicalId":44837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation study of new left atrial appendage closure device measurement by two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Sachiyo Ono, Takeshi Maruo, Shunsuke Kubo, Kazushige Kadota\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12574-023-00619-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00619-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00619-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在使用 WATCHMAN FLX 进行左房阑尾闭合术时,通过经食道超声心动图(TEE)准确测量装置非常重要。我们的目的是通过实验验证使用二维(2D)和三维(3D)TEE 测量装置的适当方法与实际尺寸的比较:我们准备了各种尺寸的设备(20、24、27、31、35 毫米),每种设备都有五种不同的压缩率。使用内线、外线和中线方法,在体外 2、4 和 6 厘米深度通过二维和三维 TEE 对每个装置进行测量。我们比较了用卡尺测量的实际尺寸与用 2D 和 3D TEE 的三种方法在每个压缩率和深度下测量的尺寸之间的差异:结果:共分析了 450 种测量模式。在二维和三维 TEE 中,使用中线法的差异远小于使用内线法和外线法的差异(二维 TEE:0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm,p 结论:在二维和三维 TEE 中,使用中线法的差异远小于使用内线法和外线法的差异:三维 TEE 中线法是使用 WATCHMAN FLX 设备进行左房阑尾关闭时设备测量的最可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation study of new left atrial appendage closure device measurement by two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Background: In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size.

Methods: We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE.

Results: A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods.

Conclusions: Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Echocardiography
Journal of Echocardiography CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Echocardiography, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, publishes work that contributes to progress in the field and articles in clinical research as well, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with this discipline. The journal welcomes original investigations, review articles, letters to the editor, editorials, and case image in cardiovascular ultrasound, which will be reviewed by the editorial board. The Journal of Echocardiography provides the best of up-to-date information from around the world, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信