早期气管切开术可缩短住院时间。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Fernanda Kazmierski Morakami, Ana Luiza Mezzaroba, Alexandre Sanches Larangeira, Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso, Carlos Augusto Marçal Camillo, Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion
{"title":"早期气管切开术可缩短住院时间。","authors":"Fernanda Kazmierski Morakami,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Mezzaroba,&nbsp;Alexandre Sanches Larangeira,&nbsp;Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Marçal Camillo,&nbsp;Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion","doi":"10.1155/2023/8456673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is evidence that prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation has negative consequences for critically ill patients and that performing tracheostomy (TQT) could help to reduce these consequences. The ideal period for performing TQT is still not clear in the literature since few studies have compared clinical aspects between patients undergoing early or late TQT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the mortality rate, length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and number of days free of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing TQT before or after ten days of orotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study carried out by collecting data from patients admitted to an intensive care unit between January 2008 and December 2017. Patients who underwent TQT were divided into an early TQT group (i.e., time to TQT ≤ 10 days) or late TQT (i.e., time to TQT > 10 days) and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the early TQT group had a shorter ICU stay than the late TQT group (19 ± 16 vs. 32 ± 22 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a shorter stay in the hospital (42 ± 32 vs. 52 ± 50 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (17 ± 14 vs. 30 ± 18 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and a higher proportion of survivors in the ICU outcome (57% vs. 46%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tracheostomy performed within 10 days of mechanical ventilation provides several benefits to the patient and should be considered by the multidisciplinary team as a part of their clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8456673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Tracheostomy May Reduce the Length of Hospital Stay.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Kazmierski Morakami,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Mezzaroba,&nbsp;Alexandre Sanches Larangeira,&nbsp;Lucienne Tibery Queiroz Cardoso,&nbsp;Carlos Augusto Marçal Camillo,&nbsp;Cintia Magalhães Carvalho Grion\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8456673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is evidence that prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation has negative consequences for critically ill patients and that performing tracheostomy (TQT) could help to reduce these consequences. The ideal period for performing TQT is still not clear in the literature since few studies have compared clinical aspects between patients undergoing early or late TQT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the mortality rate, length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and number of days free of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing TQT before or after ten days of orotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study carried out by collecting data from patients admitted to an intensive care unit between January 2008 and December 2017. Patients who underwent TQT were divided into an early TQT group (i.e., time to TQT ≤ 10 days) or late TQT (i.e., time to TQT > 10 days) and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the early TQT group had a shorter ICU stay than the late TQT group (19 ± 16 vs. 32 ± 22 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a shorter stay in the hospital (42 ± 32 vs. 52 ± 50 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (17 ± 14 vs. 30 ± 18 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and a higher proportion of survivors in the ICU outcome (57% vs. 46%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tracheostomy performed within 10 days of mechanical ventilation provides several benefits to the patient and should be considered by the multidisciplinary team as a part of their clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"8456673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10457168/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8456673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8456673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有证据表明,延长有创机械通气对危重患者有负面影响,实施气管造口术(TQT)有助于减少这些后果。由于很少有研究比较早期或晚期TQT患者的临床方面,因此在文献中尚不清楚进行TQT的理想时期。目的:比较TQT患者经口气管插管前后10天的死亡率、重症监护时间、住院时间和无机械通气天数。方法:回顾性队列研究,收集2008年1月至2017年12月入住重症监护病房的患者的数据。将行TQT的患者分为早期TQT组(即至TQT时间≤10天)和晚期TQT组(即至TQT时间> 10天),比较两组的临床结局。结果:TQT早期组患者的ICU住院时间短于TQT晚期组(19±16∶32±22∶p < 0.001),住院时间短于TQT晚期组(42±32∶52±50∶p < 0.001),机械通气时间短于TQT早期组(17±14∶30±18∶p < 0.001),存活者在ICU预后中的比例较高(57%∶46%,p < 0.001)。结论:在机械通气10天内进行气管切开术对患者有多种好处,应由多学科团队考虑作为其临床实践的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early Tracheostomy May Reduce the Length of Hospital Stay.

Early Tracheostomy May Reduce the Length of Hospital Stay.

Introduction: There is evidence that prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation has negative consequences for critically ill patients and that performing tracheostomy (TQT) could help to reduce these consequences. The ideal period for performing TQT is still not clear in the literature since few studies have compared clinical aspects between patients undergoing early or late TQT.

Objective: To compare the mortality rate, length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and number of days free of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing TQT before or after ten days of orotracheal intubation.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study carried out by collecting data from patients admitted to an intensive care unit between January 2008 and December 2017. Patients who underwent TQT were divided into an early TQT group (i.e., time to TQT ≤ 10 days) or late TQT (i.e., time to TQT > 10 days) and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results: Patients in the early TQT group had a shorter ICU stay than the late TQT group (19 ± 16 vs. 32 ± 22 days, p < 0.001), a shorter stay in the hospital (42 ± 32 vs. 52 ± 50 days, p < 0.001), a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (17 ± 14 vs. 30 ± 18 days, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of survivors in the ICU outcome (57% vs. 46%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Tracheostomy performed within 10 days of mechanical ventilation provides several benefits to the patient and should be considered by the multidisciplinary team as a part of their clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信