考察人工智能、深度学习和机器学习在金融领域的研究分类——文献计量分析。

Q1 Mathematics
Ajitha Kumari Vijayappan Nair Biju, Ann Susan Thomas, J Thasneem
{"title":"考察人工智能、深度学习和机器学习在金融领域的研究分类——文献计量分析。","authors":"Ajitha Kumari Vijayappan Nair Biju,&nbsp;Ann Susan Thomas,&nbsp;J Thasneem","doi":"10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper surveys the extant literature on machine learning, artificial intelligence, and deep learning mechanisms within the financial sphere using bibliometric methods. We considered the conceptual and social structure of publications in ML, AI, and DL in finance to better understand the research's status, development, and growth. The study finds an upsurge in publication trends within this research arena, with a bit of concentration around the financial domain. The institutional contributions from USA and China constitute much of the literature on applying ML and AI in finance. Our analysis identifies emerging research themes, with the most futuristic being ESG scoring using ML and AI. However, we find there is a lack of empirical academic research with a critical appraisal of these algorithmic-based advanced automated financial technologies. There are severe pitfalls in the prediction process using ML and AI due to algorithmic biases, mostly in the areas of insurance, credit scoring and mortgages. Thus, this study indicates the next evolution of ML and DL archetypes in the economic sphere and the need for a strategic turnaround in academics regarding these forces of disruption and innovation that are shaping the future of finance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49649,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Quantity","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153784/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere-a bibliometric analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ajitha Kumari Vijayappan Nair Biju,&nbsp;Ann Susan Thomas,&nbsp;J Thasneem\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper surveys the extant literature on machine learning, artificial intelligence, and deep learning mechanisms within the financial sphere using bibliometric methods. We considered the conceptual and social structure of publications in ML, AI, and DL in finance to better understand the research's status, development, and growth. The study finds an upsurge in publication trends within this research arena, with a bit of concentration around the financial domain. The institutional contributions from USA and China constitute much of the literature on applying ML and AI in finance. Our analysis identifies emerging research themes, with the most futuristic being ESG scoring using ML and AI. However, we find there is a lack of empirical academic research with a critical appraisal of these algorithmic-based advanced automated financial technologies. There are severe pitfalls in the prediction process using ML and AI due to algorithmic biases, mostly in the areas of insurance, credit scoring and mortgages. Thus, this study indicates the next evolution of ML and DL archetypes in the economic sphere and the need for a strategic turnaround in academics regarding these forces of disruption and innovation that are shaping the future of finance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality & Quantity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10153784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality & Quantity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Quantity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文使用文献计量方法调查了金融领域中关于机器学习、人工智能和深度学习机制的现有文献。我们考虑了金融学中ML、AI和DL出版物的概念和社会结构,以更好地了解研究的现状、发展和增长。这项研究发现,这一研究领域的出版趋势激增,有点集中在金融领域。美国和中国的机构贡献构成了关于将ML和AI应用于金融的大部分文献。我们的分析确定了新兴的研究主题,最具未来感的是使用ML和AI进行ESG评分。然而,我们发现缺乏对这些基于算法的先进自动化金融技术进行批判性评估的实证学术研究。由于算法偏见,使用ML和AI的预测过程中存在严重的陷阱,主要是在保险、信用评分和抵押贷款领域。因此,这项研究表明了ML和DL原型在经济领域的下一次演变,以及学术界对这些正在塑造金融未来的颠覆和创新力量进行战略转型的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere-a bibliometric analysis.

Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere-a bibliometric analysis.

Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere-a bibliometric analysis.

Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere-a bibliometric analysis.

This paper surveys the extant literature on machine learning, artificial intelligence, and deep learning mechanisms within the financial sphere using bibliometric methods. We considered the conceptual and social structure of publications in ML, AI, and DL in finance to better understand the research's status, development, and growth. The study finds an upsurge in publication trends within this research arena, with a bit of concentration around the financial domain. The institutional contributions from USA and China constitute much of the literature on applying ML and AI in finance. Our analysis identifies emerging research themes, with the most futuristic being ESG scoring using ML and AI. However, we find there is a lack of empirical academic research with a critical appraisal of these algorithmic-based advanced automated financial technologies. There are severe pitfalls in the prediction process using ML and AI due to algorithmic biases, mostly in the areas of insurance, credit scoring and mortgages. Thus, this study indicates the next evolution of ML and DL archetypes in the economic sphere and the need for a strategic turnaround in academics regarding these forces of disruption and innovation that are shaping the future of finance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Quantity
Quality & Quantity 管理科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality and Quantity constitutes a point of reference for European and non-European scholars to discuss instruments of methodology for more rigorous scientific results in the social sciences. In the era of biggish data, the journal also provides a publication venue for data scientists who are interested in proposing a new indicator to measure the latent aspects of social, cultural, and political events. Rather than leaning towards one specific methodological school, the journal publishes papers on a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, the journal’s key aim is to tackle some methodological pluralism across research cultures. In this context, the journal is open to papers addressing some general logic of empirical research and analysis of the validity and verification of social laws. Thus The journal accepts papers on science metrics and publication ethics and, their related issues affecting methodological practices among researchers. Quality and Quantity is an interdisciplinary journal which systematically correlates disciplines such as data and information sciences with the other humanities and social sciences. The journal extends discussion of interesting contributions in methodology to scholars worldwide, to promote the scientific development of social research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信