白色念珠菌粘附在3d打印和热聚合的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯上,用于可移动的假体。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-06-01
Michelle Cc Barros, Ricardo R Mazzon, Artur F Soto, Thais M Duque, Rangel Lidani, Cleonice S Teixeira, Gabriela P Sabatini, Maurício M Badaró
{"title":"白色念珠菌粘附在3d打印和热聚合的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯上,用于可移动的假体。","authors":"Michelle Cc Barros,&nbsp;Ricardo R Mazzon,&nbsp;Artur F Soto,&nbsp;Thais M Duque,&nbsp;Rangel Lidani,&nbsp;Cleonice S Teixeira,&nbsp;Gabriela P Sabatini,&nbsp;Maurício M Badaró","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare Candida albicans adhesion and quantify the biofilm formed on thermopolymerizable (T.PMMA) and 3D printing (3D.PMMA) polymethyl methacrylate through quantitative and qualitative analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The specimens were made (n= 39/material) by conventional polymerization (T.PMMA) and designed in Autodesk Meshmixer software, followed by 3D printing (3D.PMMA) - CAD-CAM method. After the roughness standardization, the monospecies biofilm of C. albicans (ATCC 10231) was submitted to adhesion analysis, verifying the quantification and microbial load, in triplicate, by the methods of counting colony forming units (CFU/mL) and staining with crystal violet, followed by optical density reading, respectively. Qualitative analyses were performed by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the surface characteristics of the specimens and biofilm formed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between resins regarding the count of CFU/mL (log¹⁰+ 1) and optical density values (P≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T.PMMA (5.78 ± 0.43) had a CFU/mL count (P< 0.001) higher than 3D.PMMA (4.84 ± 0.39). There was a difference between C. albicans biofilm accumulation (P< 0.001), in which on T.PMMA (1.59 ± 0.31) was higher than 3D.PMMA (1.10 ± 0.14). The qualitative analyses corresponded to the quantitative ones and allowed the visualization of more porosities in T.PMMA.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The adhesion (microbial load and biofilm accumulation) of C. albicans was lower in the 3D printed polymethyl methacrylate when compared to the thermopolymerizable model.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 3","pages":"130-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Candida albicans adhesion on 3D-printed and thermopolymerizable polymethyl methacrylate for removable prostheses.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Cc Barros,&nbsp;Ricardo R Mazzon,&nbsp;Artur F Soto,&nbsp;Thais M Duque,&nbsp;Rangel Lidani,&nbsp;Cleonice S Teixeira,&nbsp;Gabriela P Sabatini,&nbsp;Maurício M Badaró\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare Candida albicans adhesion and quantify the biofilm formed on thermopolymerizable (T.PMMA) and 3D printing (3D.PMMA) polymethyl methacrylate through quantitative and qualitative analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The specimens were made (n= 39/material) by conventional polymerization (T.PMMA) and designed in Autodesk Meshmixer software, followed by 3D printing (3D.PMMA) - CAD-CAM method. After the roughness standardization, the monospecies biofilm of C. albicans (ATCC 10231) was submitted to adhesion analysis, verifying the quantification and microbial load, in triplicate, by the methods of counting colony forming units (CFU/mL) and staining with crystal violet, followed by optical density reading, respectively. Qualitative analyses were performed by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the surface characteristics of the specimens and biofilm formed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between resins regarding the count of CFU/mL (log¹⁰+ 1) and optical density values (P≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T.PMMA (5.78 ± 0.43) had a CFU/mL count (P< 0.001) higher than 3D.PMMA (4.84 ± 0.39). There was a difference between C. albicans biofilm accumulation (P< 0.001), in which on T.PMMA (1.59 ± 0.31) was higher than 3D.PMMA (1.10 ± 0.14). The qualitative analyses corresponded to the quantitative ones and allowed the visualization of more porosities in T.PMMA.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The adhesion (microbial load and biofilm accumulation) of C. albicans was lower in the 3D printed polymethyl methacrylate when compared to the thermopolymerizable model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"130-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较白色念珠菌粘附性,定量分析热聚合(T.PMMA)和3D打印(3D. pmma)聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯上形成的生物膜。方法:采用常规聚合(T.PMMA)法制备标本(n= 39/材料),在Autodesk Meshmixer软件中进行设计,然后进行3D打印(3D. pmma) - CAD-CAM方法。粗糙度标准化后,将单种白色念珠菌(ATCC 10231)生物膜进行粘附分析,分别采用菌落形成单位计数(CFU/mL)、结晶紫染色、光密度读取等方法,对三份单种念珠菌生物膜进行定量和微生物负荷验证。通过扫描电镜进行定性分析,分析样品的表面特征和形成的生物膜。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较树脂的CFU/mL计数(log¹⁰+ 1)和光密度值(P≤0.05)。结果:T.PMMA组CFU/mL计数(5.78±0.43)高于3D组(P< 0.001)。Pmma(4.84±0.39)。两组间白色念珠菌生物膜积累量差异(P< 0.001),其中T.PMMA(1.59±0.31)高于3D。Pmma(1.10±0.14)。临床意义:3D打印的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯与热聚合模型相比,白色念珠菌的粘附力(微生物负荷和生物膜积累)更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Candida albicans adhesion on 3D-printed and thermopolymerizable polymethyl methacrylate for removable prostheses.

Purpose: To compare Candida albicans adhesion and quantify the biofilm formed on thermopolymerizable (T.PMMA) and 3D printing (3D.PMMA) polymethyl methacrylate through quantitative and qualitative analyses.

Methods: The specimens were made (n= 39/material) by conventional polymerization (T.PMMA) and designed in Autodesk Meshmixer software, followed by 3D printing (3D.PMMA) - CAD-CAM method. After the roughness standardization, the monospecies biofilm of C. albicans (ATCC 10231) was submitted to adhesion analysis, verifying the quantification and microbial load, in triplicate, by the methods of counting colony forming units (CFU/mL) and staining with crystal violet, followed by optical density reading, respectively. Qualitative analyses were performed by scanning electron microscopy to analyze the surface characteristics of the specimens and biofilm formed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between resins regarding the count of CFU/mL (log¹⁰+ 1) and optical density values (P≤ 0.05).

Results: T.PMMA (5.78 ± 0.43) had a CFU/mL count (P< 0.001) higher than 3D.PMMA (4.84 ± 0.39). There was a difference between C. albicans biofilm accumulation (P< 0.001), in which on T.PMMA (1.59 ± 0.31) was higher than 3D.PMMA (1.10 ± 0.14). The qualitative analyses corresponded to the quantitative ones and allowed the visualization of more porosities in T.PMMA.

Clinical significance: The adhesion (microbial load and biofilm accumulation) of C. albicans was lower in the 3D printed polymethyl methacrylate when compared to the thermopolymerizable model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信