急诊科医生关于艾滋病暴露后预防的决定与国家指导方针的一致性:一项回顾性队列研究的结果。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Johannes Heck, Christoph Höner Zu Siederdissen, Olaf Krause, Sebastian Schröder, Martin Schulze Westhoff, Patrick-Pascal Strunz, Carsten Schumacher, Dirk O Stichtenoth, Jacobus J Bosch, Thorben Pape, Felix Koop, Benjamin Krichevsky
{"title":"急诊科医生关于艾滋病暴露后预防的决定与国家指导方针的一致性:一项回顾性队列研究的结果。","authors":"Johannes Heck, Christoph Höner Zu Siederdissen, Olaf Krause, Sebastian Schröder, Martin Schulze Westhoff, Patrick-Pascal Strunz, Carsten Schumacher, Dirk O Stichtenoth, Jacobus J Bosch, Thorben Pape, Felix Koop, Benjamin Krichevsky","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihad076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective tool to prevent infection with HIV. Patients seeking PEP after potential HIV exposure usually present to the emergency department (ED). Our study sought to determine the concordance of ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP with national guidelines (primary objective) and to assess the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the HIV-PEP regimen and patients' concomitant medication (secondary objective).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Hannover Medical School, Germany. Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019, 113 of 11 246 screened patients presented to the ED after potential HIV exposure and were enrolled in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients (82.3% male) was 30 y (IQR 25-35.5), 85.8% of potential HIV exposures were characterised as sexual and 85.0% presented within 72 h. ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were concordant with national guidelines in 93.8%. No clinically relevant DDIs were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were highly concordant with national guidelines. Approximately 1% of patient presentations to the ED were related to HIV exposure; therefore, training ED physicians on HIV transmission risk assessment and indications/contraindications for HIV-PEP is paramount.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concordance of emergency department physicians' decisions on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with national guidelines: results from a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Heck, Christoph Höner Zu Siederdissen, Olaf Krause, Sebastian Schröder, Martin Schulze Westhoff, Patrick-Pascal Strunz, Carsten Schumacher, Dirk O Stichtenoth, Jacobus J Bosch, Thorben Pape, Felix Koop, Benjamin Krichevsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/inthealth/ihad076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective tool to prevent infection with HIV. Patients seeking PEP after potential HIV exposure usually present to the emergency department (ED). Our study sought to determine the concordance of ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP with national guidelines (primary objective) and to assess the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the HIV-PEP regimen and patients' concomitant medication (secondary objective).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Hannover Medical School, Germany. Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019, 113 of 11 246 screened patients presented to the ED after potential HIV exposure and were enrolled in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients (82.3% male) was 30 y (IQR 25-35.5), 85.8% of potential HIV exposures were characterised as sexual and 85.0% presented within 72 h. ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were concordant with national guidelines in 93.8%. No clinically relevant DDIs were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were highly concordant with national guidelines. Approximately 1% of patient presentations to the ED were related to HIV exposure; therefore, training ED physicians on HIV transmission risk assessment and indications/contraindications for HIV-PEP is paramount.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10911529/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihad076\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihad076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:暴露后预防(PEP)是预防感染艾滋病毒的有效手段。在可能暴露于 HIV 后寻求 PEP 的患者通常会到急诊科(ED)就诊。我们的研究旨在确定急诊科医生关于 HIV-PEP 的决定与国家指导方针的一致性(首要目标),并评估 HIV-PEP 方案与患者同时服用的药物之间的药物相互作用(DDIs)的临床相关性(次要目标):我们在德国汉诺威医学院急诊科开展了一项回顾性队列研究。在2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间,11 246名接受筛查的患者中有113人在可能的艾滋病暴露后到急诊科就诊并被纳入研究:患者(82.3% 为男性)的中位年龄为 30 岁(IQR 25-35.5),85.8% 的潜在 HIV 暴露为性暴露,85.0% 的患者在 72 小时内就诊。93.8% 的急诊科医生做出的 HIV-PEP 决定符合国家指南。未发现临床相关的DDIs:急诊科医生关于 HIV-PEP 的决定与国家指南高度一致。在急诊室就诊的患者中,约有 1% 与 HIV 暴露有关;因此,对急诊室医生进行 HIV 传播风险评估和 HIV-PEP 适应症/禁忌症方面的培训至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concordance of emergency department physicians' decisions on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with national guidelines: results from a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an effective tool to prevent infection with HIV. Patients seeking PEP after potential HIV exposure usually present to the emergency department (ED). Our study sought to determine the concordance of ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP with national guidelines (primary objective) and to assess the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the HIV-PEP regimen and patients' concomitant medication (secondary objective).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of Hannover Medical School, Germany. Between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019, 113 of 11 246 screened patients presented to the ED after potential HIV exposure and were enrolled in the study.

Results: The median age of the patients (82.3% male) was 30 y (IQR 25-35.5), 85.8% of potential HIV exposures were characterised as sexual and 85.0% presented within 72 h. ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were concordant with national guidelines in 93.8%. No clinically relevant DDIs were detected.

Conclusions: ED physicians' decisions on HIV-PEP were highly concordant with national guidelines. Approximately 1% of patient presentations to the ED were related to HIV exposure; therefore, training ED physicians on HIV transmission risk assessment and indications/contraindications for HIV-PEP is paramount.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信