人工耳蜗植入术中ct、超声和针刺测量皮瓣厚度的盲法比较。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2023.2239515
Rohma Abrar, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Elizabeth Whittle, Sarah Hornby, Martin O'Driscoll, Simon Freeman, Emma Stapleton
{"title":"人工耳蜗植入术中ct、超声和针刺测量皮瓣厚度的盲法比较。","authors":"Rohma Abrar, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Elizabeth Whittle, Sarah Hornby, Martin O'Driscoll, Simon Freeman, Emma Stapleton","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2239515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient suitability for cochlear implant (CI) devices compatible with magnetic resonance imaging and CI processor configuration is dependent on their retro-auricular skin flap thickness. This is typically measured intra-operatively using a needle and therefore patients are not guaranteed their implant of choice prior to surgery. We aimed to identify an accurate method to measure skin flap thickness pre-operatively to streamline CI selection and simplify the consent process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blinded prospective skin flap thickness measurements for patients undergoing CI surgery were recorded using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US), and intraoperative needle measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six adult patients (36 females, 20 males; mean age 59 years) were included. The mean flap thickness was measured highest by CT (6.9 mm, 95% CI 6.5-7.3 mm), followed by US (6.3 mm, 95% CI 5.9-6.7 mm) and lastly needle (5.5 mm, 95% CI 5.1-5.9 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). A strong positive correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.001) was noted between all three modalities: CT vs needle (<i>r</i> = 0.869), US vs needle (<i>r</i> = 0.865), and CT vs US (<i>r</i> = 0.849).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate, non-invasive measurement of skin flap thickness prior to CI surgery can be achieved using CT or US. We recommend the routine use of US in the outpatient clinic to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"295-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blinded comparison of computed tomography, ultrasound and needle methods to measure skin flap thickness for cochlear implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Rohma Abrar, Unai Martinez de Estibariz, Elizabeth Whittle, Sarah Hornby, Martin O'Driscoll, Simon Freeman, Emma Stapleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2023.2239515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient suitability for cochlear implant (CI) devices compatible with magnetic resonance imaging and CI processor configuration is dependent on their retro-auricular skin flap thickness. This is typically measured intra-operatively using a needle and therefore patients are not guaranteed their implant of choice prior to surgery. We aimed to identify an accurate method to measure skin flap thickness pre-operatively to streamline CI selection and simplify the consent process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blinded prospective skin flap thickness measurements for patients undergoing CI surgery were recorded using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US), and intraoperative needle measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six adult patients (36 females, 20 males; mean age 59 years) were included. The mean flap thickness was measured highest by CT (6.9 mm, 95% CI 6.5-7.3 mm), followed by US (6.3 mm, 95% CI 5.9-6.7 mm) and lastly needle (5.5 mm, 95% CI 5.1-5.9 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). A strong positive correlation (<i>p</i> < 0.001) was noted between all three modalities: CT vs needle (<i>r</i> = 0.869), US vs needle (<i>r</i> = 0.865), and CT vs US (<i>r</i> = 0.849).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate, non-invasive measurement of skin flap thickness prior to CI surgery can be achieved using CT or US. We recommend the routine use of US in the outpatient clinic to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"295-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2023.2239515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2023.2239515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者是否适合与磁共振成像和CI处理器配置兼容的人工耳蜗(CI)设备取决于其耳后皮瓣的厚度。这通常是术中使用针头测量的,因此患者在手术前不能保证他们选择的植入物。我们的目的是确定一种准确的方法来测量皮瓣厚度术前,以简化CI选择和简化同意过程。方法:采用术前计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声(US)以及术中针头测量对CI手术患者进行盲法前瞻性皮瓣厚度测量。结果:成人患者56例,其中女性36例,男性20例;平均年龄59岁)。CT测量皮瓣平均厚度最高(6.9 mm, 95% CI 6.5-7.3 mm),其次是US (6.3 mm, 95% CI 5.9-6.7 mm),最后是针(5.5 mm, 95% CI 5.1-5.9 mm) (p p r = 0.869), US vs needle (r = 0.865), CT vs US (r = 0.849)。结论:在CI手术前使用CT或US可以准确、无创地测量皮瓣厚度。我们建议在门诊常规使用US,以尽量减少不必要的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blinded comparison of computed tomography, ultrasound and needle methods to measure skin flap thickness for cochlear implantation.

Purpose: Patient suitability for cochlear implant (CI) devices compatible with magnetic resonance imaging and CI processor configuration is dependent on their retro-auricular skin flap thickness. This is typically measured intra-operatively using a needle and therefore patients are not guaranteed their implant of choice prior to surgery. We aimed to identify an accurate method to measure skin flap thickness pre-operatively to streamline CI selection and simplify the consent process.

Methods: Blinded prospective skin flap thickness measurements for patients undergoing CI surgery were recorded using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US), and intraoperative needle measurement.

Results: Fifty-six adult patients (36 females, 20 males; mean age 59 years) were included. The mean flap thickness was measured highest by CT (6.9 mm, 95% CI 6.5-7.3 mm), followed by US (6.3 mm, 95% CI 5.9-6.7 mm) and lastly needle (5.5 mm, 95% CI 5.1-5.9 mm) (p < 0.0001). A strong positive correlation (p < 0.001) was noted between all three modalities: CT vs needle (r = 0.869), US vs needle (r = 0.865), and CT vs US (r = 0.849).

Conclusion: Accurate, non-invasive measurement of skin flap thickness prior to CI surgery can be achieved using CT or US. We recommend the routine use of US in the outpatient clinic to minimise unnecessary radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信