工作流程整合调查在土耳其的适应性:有效性和可靠性研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Meltem Özduyan Kılıç, Fatoş Korkmaz
{"title":"工作流程整合调查在土耳其的适应性:有效性和可靠性研究。","authors":"Meltem Özduyan Kılıç, Fatoş Korkmaz","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Electronic health record systems (EHRSs) are widely used to record patients' data and should be compatible with nurses' workflow. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Workflow Integration Survey (WIS) to the Turkish language and examine the reliability and validity measures of the Turkish version of the scale. <b>Methods:</b> In this methodological study, data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020 from 120 nurses. This study included the following phases: translation and evaluation of the content validity; explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the test-retest reliability with 30 nurses. <b>Results:</b> The results of CFA revealed a two factors' structure, and these two factors explained 50.57% of the total variance. This was confirmed (χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 1.673, goodness-of-fit index = 0.948, incremental fit index = 0.923, comparative fit index = 0.918, root mean square error of approximation = 0.075, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.0604) using structural equation modeling. The total Cronbach's alpha value was found to be .702, .636, and .649 for the subscales. The ICC was calculated for test-retest reliability and was found to be 0.871. <b>Conclusions:</b> The validity and reliability of the WIS have been found to be sufficient. It is recommended that the validity and reliability studies on the WIS be conducted in different hospitals with a larger number of participants. Furthermore, the use of the scale in cross-cultural studies to evaluate the compatibility of EHRSs with nurses' workflow in different cultures is also suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":"174-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation of the Workflow Integration Survey to Turkey: A Validity and Reliability Study.\",\"authors\":\"Meltem Özduyan Kılıç, Fatoş Korkmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JNM-2022-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Electronic health record systems (EHRSs) are widely used to record patients' data and should be compatible with nurses' workflow. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Workflow Integration Survey (WIS) to the Turkish language and examine the reliability and validity measures of the Turkish version of the scale. <b>Methods:</b> In this methodological study, data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020 from 120 nurses. This study included the following phases: translation and evaluation of the content validity; explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the test-retest reliability with 30 nurses. <b>Results:</b> The results of CFA revealed a two factors' structure, and these two factors explained 50.57% of the total variance. This was confirmed (χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 1.673, goodness-of-fit index = 0.948, incremental fit index = 0.923, comparative fit index = 0.918, root mean square error of approximation = 0.075, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.0604) using structural equation modeling. The total Cronbach's alpha value was found to be .702, .636, and .649 for the subscales. The ICC was calculated for test-retest reliability and was found to be 0.871. <b>Conclusions:</b> The validity and reliability of the WIS have been found to be sufficient. It is recommended that the validity and reliability studies on the WIS be conducted in different hospitals with a larger number of participants. Furthermore, the use of the scale in cross-cultural studies to evaluate the compatibility of EHRSs with nurses' workflow in different cultures is also suggested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"174-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2022-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:电子健康记录系统(EHRS)被广泛用于记录患者数据,应与护士的工作流程兼容。本研究旨在将工作流程整合调查(WIS)改编为土耳其语,并检验土耳其语版量表的信度和效度。研究方法在这项方法研究中,于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月期间收集了 120 名护士的数据。本研究包括以下阶段:翻译和内容效度评估;解释性因子分析和确认性因子分析(CFA)以及信度分析。使用类内相关系数(ICC)对 30 名护士进行了测试-再测可靠性分析。结果显示CFA 的结果显示有两个因素结构,这两个因素解释了总方差的 50.57%。结构方程模型证实了这一点(χ2/df = 1.673,拟合优度指数 = 0.948,增量拟合指数 = 0.923,比较拟合指数 = 0.918,均方根近似误差 = 0.075,标准化均方根残差 = 0.0604)。各分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 总值分别为 0.702、0.636 和 0.649。计算了测试-再测信度的 ICC,结果为 0.871。结论WIS 的效度和信度都是充分的。建议在不同的医院和更多的参与者中进行 WIS 的有效性和可靠性研究。此外,还建议在跨文化研究中使用该量表来评估 EHRS 与不同文化背景下护士工作流程的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation of the Workflow Integration Survey to Turkey: A Validity and Reliability Study.

Background and Purpose: Electronic health record systems (EHRSs) are widely used to record patients' data and should be compatible with nurses' workflow. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Workflow Integration Survey (WIS) to the Turkish language and examine the reliability and validity measures of the Turkish version of the scale. Methods: In this methodological study, data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020 from 120 nurses. This study included the following phases: translation and evaluation of the content validity; explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the test-retest reliability with 30 nurses. Results: The results of CFA revealed a two factors' structure, and these two factors explained 50.57% of the total variance. This was confirmed (χ2/df = 1.673, goodness-of-fit index = 0.948, incremental fit index = 0.923, comparative fit index = 0.918, root mean square error of approximation = 0.075, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.0604) using structural equation modeling. The total Cronbach's alpha value was found to be .702, .636, and .649 for the subscales. The ICC was calculated for test-retest reliability and was found to be 0.871. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the WIS have been found to be sufficient. It is recommended that the validity and reliability studies on the WIS be conducted in different hospitals with a larger number of participants. Furthermore, the use of the scale in cross-cultural studies to evaluate the compatibility of EHRSs with nurses' workflow in different cultures is also suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信