真实还是大胆(数字肛门直肠检查):妇科医生对肛门癌症筛查的看法。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-16 DOI:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000762
Laura M Gaydos, Danielle Blemur, Tahira Perry, Elizabeth A Stier, Michelle J Khan, Lisa Flowers
{"title":"真实还是大胆(数字肛门直肠检查):妇科医生对肛门癌症筛查的看法。","authors":"Laura M Gaydos,&nbsp;Danielle Blemur,&nbsp;Tahira Perry,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Stier,&nbsp;Michelle J Khan,&nbsp;Lisa Flowers","doi":"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a survey for practicing gynecologists recruited through academic institutions, professional societies, and professional groups on social media resulting in 196 respondents. The survey, fielded between January and June 2022, included questions on knowledge, attitudes, training, and practices regarding anal cancer prevention (ACP). Descriptive statistics and χ 2 analysis were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of knowledge regarding ACP, over 80% of respondents identified certain clinical indications for anal cancer screening. However, only 36% respondents selected the 3 correct ACP screening tools. Twenty-seven (13.9%) respondents reported receiving training on ACP in medical school, whereas 50 (25.9%) reported receiving training during residency. Only 21% of respondents reported that they perform anal cytology, and 32% reported that they perform digital anal rectal examinations. One hundred thirty-six respondents (75.56%) affirmed that they needed additional training on ACP to be able to provide this service to their patients, and 95 (53.1%) stated they were extremely likely to participate in ACP training if given the opportunity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a limited proportion of practicing gynecologists are trained in ACP, there is willingness to participate in training if it were made available and to incorporate ACP into their practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","volume":" ","pages":"351-355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Truth or DARE (Digital Anal Rectal Examination): Gynecologist Viewpoints on Anal Cancer Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Laura M Gaydos,&nbsp;Danielle Blemur,&nbsp;Tahira Perry,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Stier,&nbsp;Michelle J Khan,&nbsp;Lisa Flowers\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LGT.0000000000000762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a survey for practicing gynecologists recruited through academic institutions, professional societies, and professional groups on social media resulting in 196 respondents. The survey, fielded between January and June 2022, included questions on knowledge, attitudes, training, and practices regarding anal cancer prevention (ACP). Descriptive statistics and χ 2 analysis were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of knowledge regarding ACP, over 80% of respondents identified certain clinical indications for anal cancer screening. However, only 36% respondents selected the 3 correct ACP screening tools. Twenty-seven (13.9%) respondents reported receiving training on ACP in medical school, whereas 50 (25.9%) reported receiving training during residency. Only 21% of respondents reported that they perform anal cytology, and 32% reported that they perform digital anal rectal examinations. One hundred thirty-six respondents (75.56%) affirmed that they needed additional training on ACP to be able to provide this service to their patients, and 95 (53.1%) stated they were extremely likely to participate in ACP training if given the opportunity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a limited proportion of practicing gynecologists are trained in ACP, there is willingness to participate in training if it were made available and to incorporate ACP into their practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"351-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000762\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法:作者对通过学术机构、专业协会和社交媒体上的专业团体招募的执业妇科医生进行了一项调查,共有196名受访者。该调查于2022年1月至6月进行,包括有关肛门癌症预防(ACP)的知识、态度、培训和实践的问题。完成描述性统计和χ2分析。结果:在ACP知识方面,超过80%的受访者确定了肛门癌症筛查的某些临床适应症。然而,只有36%的受访者选择了3种正确的ACP筛查工具。27名(13.9%)受访者报告在医学院接受过ACP培训,而50名(25.9%)受访者报告称在住院期间接受过培训。只有21%的受访者报告说他们进行了肛门细胞学检查,32%的受访者报告他们进行了指肛门直肠检查。136名受访者(75.56%)表示,他们需要额外的ACP培训才能为患者提供这项服务,95名受访者(53.1%)表示,如果有机会,他们极有可能参加ACP培训。结论:尽管接受ACP培训的执业妇科医生比例有限,但如果有培训,他们愿意参与培训,并将ACP纳入他们的实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Truth or DARE (Digital Anal Rectal Examination): Gynecologist Viewpoints on Anal Cancer Screening.

Methods: The authors conducted a survey for practicing gynecologists recruited through academic institutions, professional societies, and professional groups on social media resulting in 196 respondents. The survey, fielded between January and June 2022, included questions on knowledge, attitudes, training, and practices regarding anal cancer prevention (ACP). Descriptive statistics and χ 2 analysis were completed.

Results: In terms of knowledge regarding ACP, over 80% of respondents identified certain clinical indications for anal cancer screening. However, only 36% respondents selected the 3 correct ACP screening tools. Twenty-seven (13.9%) respondents reported receiving training on ACP in medical school, whereas 50 (25.9%) reported receiving training during residency. Only 21% of respondents reported that they perform anal cytology, and 32% reported that they perform digital anal rectal examinations. One hundred thirty-six respondents (75.56%) affirmed that they needed additional training on ACP to be able to provide this service to their patients, and 95 (53.1%) stated they were extremely likely to participate in ACP training if given the opportunity.

Conclusion: Although a limited proportion of practicing gynecologists are trained in ACP, there is willingness to participate in training if it were made available and to incorporate ACP into their practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the source for the latest science about benign and malignant conditions of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and anus. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research original research that addresses prevalence, causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of lower genital tract disease. We publish clinical guidelines, position papers, cost-effectiveness analyses, narrative reviews, and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses. We also publish papers about research and reporting methods, opinions about controversial medical issues. Of particular note, we encourage material in any of the above mentioned categories that is related to improving patient care, avoiding medical errors, and comparative effectiveness research. We encourage publication of evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, and decision aids. Original research and reviews may be sub-classified according to topic: cervix and HPV, vulva and vagina, perianal and anal, basic science, and education and learning. The scope and readership of the journal extend to several disciplines: gynecology, internal medicine, family practice, dermatology, physical therapy, pathology, sociology, psychology, anthropology, sex therapy, and pharmacology. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease highlights needs for future research, and enhances health care. The Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease is the official journal of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease, and the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy, and sponsored by the Australian Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the Society of Canadian Colposcopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信