{"title":"Federal Aid and Equality of Educational Opportunity: Evidence from the Introduction of Title I in the South","authors":"Elizabeth U. Cascio, N. Gordon, Sarah J. Reber","doi":"10.3386/W17155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W17155","url":null,"abstract":"Title I of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act substantially increased federal aid for education, with the goal of expanding educational opportunity. Combining the timing of the program's introduction with variation in its intensity, we find that Title I increased school spending by 46 cents on the dollar in the average school district in the South and increased spending nearly dollar-for-dollar in Southern districts with little scope for local offset. Based on this differential fiscal response, we find that increases in school budgets from Title I decreased high school dropout rates for whites, but not blacks.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116660059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lautsi: A Commentary of the Grand Chamber Decision","authors":"L. Zucca","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1809577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1809577","url":null,"abstract":"This is a critical comment of the Crucifix in the Classroom case decided by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights. The comment deals with three issues: the place of religious symbols in the public sphere, the meaning of secularism today, and the notion of respect owed to parental convictions in the educational context. Each one of these pose a big problem in relation to the place of religion in the European Constitutional landscape.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126001243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do Amish One-Room Schools Make the Grade? The Dubious Data of Wisconsin v. Yoder","authors":"W. Fischel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1800409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1800409","url":null,"abstract":"Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972), allowed the Old Order Amish to limit their children’s education to eight grades in private, one-room schools that resemble those of the nineteenth century. An important factual claim in Yoder was that Amish education was as effective as that provided by modern public elementary schools. This claim was supported by a statistical study directed by John Hostetler, the chief expert witness for the Amish. I show here that Hostetler’s data and findings should not have been taken seriously. I bring this charge not to urge that the Amish be herded back to public schools but to support a position I advanced in Making the Grade (Chicago 2009). I argued there that school-district consolidation from 1900 to 1970, which eliminated public one-room schools, was driven by popular demand for high school education and not, as is commonly assumed, by the top-down commands of state bureaucrats. It appears that the Amish maintain one-room schools for the very reason that non-Amish voters agreed to abandon them in the twentieth century: The education they provide is inadequate preparation for high school. I conclude by questioning the relevance of Yoder for present-day Amish education.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130148576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religion and Education in Northern Ireland","authors":"C. McCrudden","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1742144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1742144","url":null,"abstract":"Since the foundation of Northern Ireland in 1920, the issue of control over primary and secondary education has been a source of significant tension between the two main ethno-religious communities in Northern Ireland, and between them and the government of Northern Ireland. Education in Northern Ireland is distinctly differently organized in Northern Ireland compared with the rest of the United Kingdom, and several of its ‘unique features’ (McKeown and Connolly, 1992, 211) arise out of the particular form of the political and religious sensitivities of education in the former. The paper is structured as follows. First, I shall outline the features of the governance of education in Northern Irish model. Second, I shall attempt to explain briefly why these features came about. Third, I shall consider research that has attempted to understand what are the effects of the model on the religious background of pupils in different schools. Fourth, I shall consider the role of teachers in this model. Fifth, I shall consider issues relating to curriculum and collective worship. Sixth, the crucial issue of school funding will be examined. Finally, I shall consider the prospects for the model in the future, by considering pupil opinion on the structure of schooling, and I shall explain how this model relates to political developments in Northern Ireland generally.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124128867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Private Choice in Public Programs","authors":"Dick Carpenter","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1689075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1689075","url":null,"abstract":"In 2006, the Arizona Legislature passed two new educational voucher programs, each worth $2.5 million annually, for children in foster care and for children with disabilities. On November 14, 2006, school choice opponents filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the programs. Yet, as this report details, for decades the State of Arizona has operated voucher-style programs just like the new educational scholarships. These programs, ranging from educational aid to welfare to adoption assistance, give aid directly to those in need and allow them to spend it on the service provider of their choice, including public agencies, private organizations and even, in most programs, religious schools and institutions. Similarly, school choice plans like Arizona’s give scholarships directly to qualifying parents who can then select the public, private or religious school of their choice. Indeed, we found that Arizona already had six different educational voucher programs that help more than 22,000 students annually attend the public, private or religious school of their choice. And the total annual cost of $22 million for these programs dwarfs the $5 million allotted for Arizona’s new school choice programs. This report shows that voucher programs that give recipients the free and independent choice of an array of providers, including faith-based organizations, have a long and established history in Arizona. Vouchers for foster children and those with disabilities represent only a modest addition to a long-standing and sensible policy of providing services through efficient choice-based programs for those most in need.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124911445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Weinstein, E. Debraggio, A. Schwartz, Jacob Leos-Urbel, L. Nazar
{"title":"Urban Advantage Interim Report","authors":"M. Weinstein, E. Debraggio, A. Schwartz, Jacob Leos-Urbel, L. Nazar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1874847","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1874847","url":null,"abstract":"Urban Advantage (UA) is a comprehensive program, designed to improve scientific learning and investigation in middle schools in New York City. It provides professional development to teachers, school administrators, and parent coordinators along with resources to schools, students, and families. UA takes advantage of the wealth of intellectual and institutional capacity available in the city and facilitates access to those resources for the city’s students. This report presents the first results of the study being conducted by the Institute for Education and Social Policy at New York University of the first five years of UA.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121003106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Catholic Schools, Urban Neighborhoods, and Education Reform","authors":"M. Brinig, N. Garnett","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1395676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1395676","url":null,"abstract":"More than 1,600 Catholic elementary and secondary schools have closed or been consolidated during the last two decades. The Archdiocese of Chicago alone (the subject of our study) has closed 148 schools since 1984. Primarily because urban Catholic schools have a strong track record of educating disadvantaged children who do not, generally, fare well in public schools, these school closures have prompted concern in education policy circles. While we are inclined to agree that Catholic school closures contribute to a broader educational crisis, this paper shies away from debates about educational outcomes. Rather than focusing on the work done inside the schools, we focus on what goes on outside them. Specifically, using three decades of data drawn from the census and from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (“PHDCN”), we seek to understand what a Catholic school means to an urban neighborhood. We do so primarily by measuring various effects of elementary school closures in the Chicago neighborhoods where they operated for decades. We find strong evidence that Catholic elementary schools are important generators of social capital in urban neighborhoods: Our study suggests that neighborhood social cohesion decreases and disorder increases following an elementary school closure, even after controlling for numerous demographic variables that would tend to predict neighborhood decline and disaggregating the school closure decision from those variable as well. This paper discusses these findings and situates them within important land-use and education-policy debates.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128922497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Employment Contracts for Teachers as Professional Employees","authors":"D. Mangan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1491613","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1491613","url":null,"abstract":"In England and Canada there is a ‘professional’ nuance to teachers’ employment. Jurisprudence in both countries suggests a deliberate expansion of what reasonable expectations education employers have of their teacher employees. Teachers’ claim to professional status forms the basis for this expansion of teachers’ duties. The function of this long-held interpretation constitutes a further step in the contractualisation of teachers’ work. A hallmark of reforms dating back to the 1970s has been the increasing prescription of teachers work, a point which remains at odds with the claimed professional status. The age of the relevant cases hints that contractual flexibility has been a tool during times of reform. The result is that teachers’ employment contracts are understood as professional-level contracts, which means (to the courts) that not all duties must be spelled out in the contract. In fact, professional-level contracts cannot possibly include such an itemisation. Teachers are left with a series of lost decisions which reinforce not only their professional status (though in an unintended manner), but also unequivocally identify them as employees who are expected to follow all reasonable expectations of their education employers.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116819196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Contrasting Role of Ability and Poverty on Education Attainment: Evidence from Indonesia","authors":"D. Suryadarma, A. Suryahadi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1458065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1458065","url":null,"abstract":"This study measures the relative role of poverty and scholastic ability on education attainment in developing countries, where a substantial portion of the population still live in poverty and poor people are markedly credit constrained. Different from most studies in developing countries, this paper uses a multiple wave and long-spanning panel dataset that follows a cohort of children beginning from primary school until they are well over schooling age. We find that poverty has a statistically significant and negative effect on junior secondary attainment, while it has a negligible effect on senior secondary completion. In contrast, scholastic ability plays no role in ensuring junior secondary completion but is crucial in increasing a child’s chance to graduate from senior secondary school. In addition, we find that high and low ability poor children have a similarly low chance of finishing junior secondary school. Based on our findings, we formulate several policy recommendations to increase education attainment.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121738838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spillover Effects of Inclusion of Classmates with Emotional Problems on Test Scores in Early Elementary School","authors":"Jason M. Fletcher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1424191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1424191","url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, the federal government has directed schools to provide educational instruction for students with special needs in general education setting to the extent possible. While there is mixed evidence on the effects of these inclusion policies on the students with special needs, research examining potential spillovers of inclusion on non-disabled classmates has been scarce. There is particularly little research on the effects of inclusion policies on classmates during early elementary grades. This paper begins to fill in this gap by using a nationally representative, longitudinal survey of Kindergarteners. Cross sectional results suggest that having a classmate with an emotional problem decreases reading and math scores at the end of Kindergarten and first grade by over 10% of a standard deviation, which is 1/3 to 1/2 of the minority test score gap. In order to control for non-random sorting of students to schools as well as students to classrooms, this paper uses school-level and then student-level fixed effects. Results from the preferred empirical models suggest a decrease of approximately 5% of a standard deviation in math and reading scores, though the results are reading are less robust. The results also indicate moderate racial and gender differences in the effects.","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117126320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}