Progress in Plant Protection最新文献_第10页

Use of chemical plant protection agents in the farms of Podkarpackie region Podkarpackie地区农场化学植物保护剂的使用

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2020-004

J. Podleśny, Karolina Smytkiewicz

引用次数: 0

Pesticide residues in agricultural crops (2016–2017) 2016-2017年农作物农药残留情况

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/PPP-2020-023

A. Nowacka, Agnieszka Hołodyńska-Kulas

{"title":"Pesticide residues in agricultural crops (2016–2017)","authors":"A. Nowacka, Agnieszka Hołodyńska-Kulas","doi":"10.14199/PPP-2020-023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14199/PPP-2020-023","url":null,"abstract":"In the years 2016–2017, the Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute tested 3019 samples of domestic agricultural products collected from production sites all over the country for pesticide residues as part of official control conducted in Poland. The study included 60 products and 499 compounds. Most of the samples tested were vegetables (44.6%) and fruits (33.3%), the others – cereals (13.2%), oilseeds (4.6%) and legumes (1.9%), sugar plants (2.1%) and spices (0.3%). No residues were found in 61.8 % of the samples. Overall, 99 compounds were found in 38.2% of all samples. Pesticide residues were detected in 55.8% of fruit samples, 33.5% of vegetable samples, 14.9% of cereal samples, 6.9% of legume seed samples, 39.3% of rapeseed samples, 25.8% of sugar plant samples, as well in 77.8% of spice samples. Pesticide residues were often found in samples of caraway (77.8%), apples (70.3%), celeriac (68.1%), peaches and sweet cherries (63.2%), dill (61.9%), currants (61.0%), strawberries (60.4%), cucumbers (59.3%), sour cherries (59.2%), carrots (58.0%), grapes (56.4%), apricots (55.6%), parsley roots (53.6%), gooseberries (52.6%) and pears (50.0%). The most frequently found active substances of plant protection products were dithiocarbamates (9.4%), boscalid (6.7%), acetamiprid (5.3%) and chlorpyrifos (4.9%). The residues of unauthorised plant protection products were found in 9.0% of the sample, while the 1.9% of analysed samples were not compliant with the requirements of the maximum residue levels ( MRLs).","PeriodicalId":20625,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Plant Protection","volume":"60 1","pages":"201-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66712278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Infestation of potato tubers by a Streptomyces scabies depending on application of herbicides and biostimulants 马铃薯块茎受一种疥疮链霉菌的侵害，取决于除草剂和生物刺激剂的使用

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/PPP-2020-027

K. Zarzecka, M. Gugała, Iwona Mystkowska, A. Sikorska

引用次数: 0

Chromelosporium fulvum (Link) McGinty, Hennebert & Korf – a new danger for houseplants 富尔姆铬孢——室内植物的新危险

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2020-039

引用次数: 0

100 years of scientific research and development of plant protection in Poland 波兰植物保护科学研究和发展100年

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2020-007

S. Pruszyński

引用次数: 0

Possibilities of chemical control of anthracnose (Colletotrichum spp.) in lupine crop 羽扇豆作物炭疽病化学防治的可能性

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/PPP-2020-009

J. Horoszkiewicz-Janka, M. Korbas, E. Jajor, J. Danielewicz

{"title":"Possibilities of chemical control of anthracnose (Colletotrichum spp.) in lupine crop","authors":"J. Horoszkiewicz-Janka, M. Korbas, E. Jajor, J. Danielewicz","doi":"10.14199/PPP-2020-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14199/PPP-2020-009","url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of direct subsidies for legumes in recent years is one of the main factors causing growth of the area of, among others, lupine crops in Poland. Occurrence of diseases, including anthracnose, which is dangerous for lupine, reduces the quantity and quality of crops. There are only two active substances (thiophanate methyl and chlorothalonil) registered for spray application to control the symptoms of anthracnose during the vegetation season. In order to check the possibilities of reducing the severity of anthracnose symptoms and the growth of Colletotrichum spp. – the perpetrators of the disease, field and laboratory experiments were carried out. In studies with yellow and narrow-leaved lupine, the possibilities of using fungicides belonging to chemical groups other than previously registered fungicides were determined. Preparations containing such active substances as picoxystrobin and tebuconazole reduced the occurrence of anthracnose symptoms on yellow lupine in a year with very high disease pressure. Under in vitro conditions Colletotrichum spp. growth was limited the most by the active substances such as prochloraz, picoxystrobin and tebuconazole.","PeriodicalId":20625,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Plant Protection","volume":"60 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66711994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

ompetition or cooperation? – the concurrent development of grain weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.) and lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica F.)on barley grain 竞争还是合作?-大麦籽粒象甲(Sitophilus granarius L.)和小螟虫(Rhyzopertha dominica F.)同时发育

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2020-017

M. Nietupski

{"title":"ompetition or cooperation? – the concurrent development of grain weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.) and lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica F.)on barley grain","authors":"M. Nietupski","doi":"10.14199/ppp-2020-017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14199/ppp-2020-017","url":null,"abstract":"This study consists of an evaluation of the development of two primary grain pests: lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica F.) and grain weevil (Sitophilus granarius L.) on barley grain. The research objective was to evaluate the concurrent development of these two species and to determine if there was a competition between them, and if so which species was winning it. Parameters of the populations of these pests were examined (abundance of the offspring generation, amount of dust and loss of grain mass) in variants where the pest species had identical conditions for development or when one had an advantage (in terms of their number or duration of being settled on the grain). The species developed under constant thermal and humidity conditions maintained in a climate chamber, for 8 weeks. When they develop independently, there was a linear relationship between the growth in the number of offspring and the dust mass and kernel mass loss. When developing together with the other species, the lesser grain borer had better conditions for the development, probably owing to greater availability of dust used by young larvae of R. dominica. The lesser grain borer formed larger progeny populations and had a more dynamic development as a species than the grain weevil did.","PeriodicalId":20625,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Plant Protection","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66712085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Herbicidal efficiency of bromoxynil used independently and in mixtures under conditions of integrated maize cultivation 玉米综合栽培条件下溴霉尼单独使用和混合使用的除草效果

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/PPP-2020-018

H. Gołębiowska, R. Kieloch

引用次数: 1

The influence of acetamiprid and chlorpyrifos on the biological activity entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae) 啶虫脒和毒死蜱对昆虫病原线虫生物活性的影响

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/PPP-2020-020

Katarzyna Kruk, M. Dzięgielewska

引用次数: 0

Assessment of the use of plant protection products on vegetable crops in Poland in years 2017−2018 2017 - 2018年波兰蔬菜作物植保产品使用情况评估

Progress in Plant Protection Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.14199/ppp-2020-033

引用次数: 0