TPRC48: Conference Proceedings最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
How Much is Privacy Worth Around the World and Across Platforms? 隐私在全球和跨平台上的价值是多少?
TPRC48: Conference Proceedings Pub Date : 2020-01-30 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3528386
Jeffrey T. Prince, S. Wallsten
{"title":"How Much is Privacy Worth Around the World and Across Platforms?","authors":"Jeffrey T. Prince, S. Wallsten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3528386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528386","url":null,"abstract":"Data privacy has become a controversial policy issue around the world. The EU passed strict privacy rules, the state of California has rules coming into effect in 2020, and the U.S. FTC and Congress are pursuing privacy agendas. However, limited empirical evidence illuminates how much consumers value privacy or how their valuations vary across or within countries and contexts. In this paper, we measure individuals’ valuation of online privacy across a wide range of countries and data types. The online information we consider includes personal information on finances, biometrics, location, networks, communications, and web browsing. The countries we analyze include the United States, Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and Germany. We conduct these measures using carefully designed, internationally distributed, discrete choice surveys. These surveys allow us to measure tradeoffs across these aspects of online privacy, and importantly, allow us to make relative comparisons of these tradeoffs across many countries. \u0000 \u0000We find that people in Germany place the highest value on privacy compared to the U.S. and Latin American countries. Across countries, people place the highest value on keeping financial and biometric information private — balance and fingerprint data in particular. Germany’s status as the country with highest value for privacy is driven largely by extremely strong preferences for keeping financial data private. German respondents were willing to share bank balance information in exchange for monthly payments of $15.43 and cash withdrawal information for $13.42/month. People had to be paid the least for permission to receive ads, meaning people are much less concerned about ads than any of the other types of data we explored. Indeed, in Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico, the average respondent was willing to pay small amounts to receive ads, suggesting that people in those countries like receiving ads. Location privacy also turned out to be among the least valuable to people in every country. \u0000 \u0000We also find that women value privacy more than men do across platforms, data types, and countries and older people value privacy more than younger people. We find no real differences across income in privacy preferences. \u0000 \u0000These results are largely robust to a randomly controlled treatment, where a group of survey respondents received a written statement about the value of data collection by these entities. Preferences for privacy are generally unaffected by such a prompt, suggesting that their values of only privacy are reasonably stable and not easily influenced.","PeriodicalId":109453,"journal":{"name":"TPRC48: Conference Proceedings","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114210450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信