Max Weber Studies最新文献_第8页

The Iron Cage Revisited: Max Weber in the Neoliberal Era by R. Bruce Douglass (review) 《铁笼重访:新自由主义时代的马克斯·韦伯》作者:r·布鲁斯·道格拉斯

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2020.0007

Omar Kassem

引用次数: 0

Obituary: Guenther Roth, 1931-2019 讣告:冈瑟·罗斯，1931-2019

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2020.0002

Stephen Kalberg

引用次数: 0

Science, Rationalization, and the Persistence of Enchantment 科学，合理化和持久的魅力

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2020.0018

E. Weisz

引用次数: 2

Confucianism and the Chinese Self: Re-examining Max Weber's China by Jack Barbalet (review) 儒学与中国自我:再审视马克斯·韦伯的中国杰克·巴巴莱特(书评)

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2020.0015

D. Zang

引用次数: 0

Economy and Society: A New Translation by Max WeberKeith Tribe (review) 《经济与社会:马克斯·韦伯的新译本》(书评)

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2019.0000

F. Lechner

引用次数: 0

Verstehende Soziologie und Werturteilsfreiheit. Schriften und Reden 1908-1917 by Max Weber (review) 深入的社会学和论自由1908年作家麦克斯·韦伯评论《评论》

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2019.0005

Guy Oakes

引用次数: 0

On Weber's Partiality to ‘Logic‘ 论韦伯对“逻辑”的偏爱

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2019.0004

Hubert Treiber

{"title":"On Weber's Partiality to ‘Logic‘","authors":"Hubert Treiber","doi":"10.1353/max.2019.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2019.0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Weber uses the term ‘logical’ with striking frequency: as a typical attribute of what is ‘rational’, but also in the definition of legal arrangements, where the ‘legally relevant components’ that characterise a legal institution are ordered in a ‘manner which is itself logically free from contradiction’. Logic or logically significant characteristics are all features of the theoretical and academic doctrine of law, which stands as a contrasting type to the artisanal-empirical doctrine of the law of practitioners (represented by Roman and English law respectively). In this way logic or what is logical is an important sign of the difference between these two fundamental types of legal doctrine. Above all, logic and the logical play an outstanding role in Weber's definition of a legal ‘system’ in the sense of ‘an assembly of all the legal propositions established by analysis in such a way that, taken all together, they form a system of rules that is itself logically free from contradiction and seamless in principle’. In this definition of ‘system’ Weber makes use of the postulates of so-called conceptual jurisprudence, something that did not exist in fact, but which originally signified a deliberate caricature (or criticism) of the science of the Pandects, of which Georg Friedrich Puchta (1798-1846) stood as the representative. He was selected because Rudolf von Jhering had Puchta mainly in mind when he framed the polemical idea of conceptual jurisprudence. Puchta was also singled out because he spoke, inter alia, of a ‘genealogy of concepts’, which encouraged the ascription of systemic qualities to his system of private law. Yet Weber omitted to test Puchta's ‘system’ according to his own ideal-typical criterion of a system that ‘logically free from contradiction’ and ‘seamless in principle’. This deficiency will be remedied here.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115040124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Conflict, Order and Societal Change in Max Weber's Ancient Judaism: Substantive and Methodological Implications 马克思·韦伯古代犹太教的冲突、秩序与社会变迁:实质与方法论意义

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2019.0015

M. Rosenberg

{"title":"Conflict, Order and Societal Change in Max Weber's Ancient Judaism: Substantive and Methodological Implications","authors":"M. Rosenberg","doi":"10.1353/max.2019.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2019.0015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Although Max Weber never formulated a theory of societal change, his study of Ancient Judaism was primarily concerned with understanding and explaining such change; especially the development of a disenchanted, this-worldly monotheistic faith having significant social and characterological consequences. Implicit in Weber's understanding of societal change is a dialectical relation between conflict and an order in which each serves both to reinforce and to transform the other. Conflict among Israelite social strata forms a consistent theme throughout Weber's discussion in Ancient Judaism, particularly the conflict between the patrimonial Israelite kings and the charismatic Hebrew prophets. This dynamic focus on conflict and change has methodological consequences which Weber illustrated with particular clarity in Ancient Judaism, especially in his application of the ideal types of traditional, charismatic, and legal Herrschaft. Presented in ‘Basic Sociological Concepts’ as terminologically precise and logically distinct, the flexibility and adaptability evident in Weber's application of these types to the empirical context of ancient Israel shows that he considered them to be profoundly interrelated.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131665316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

On Academic Freedom 论学术自由

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2019.0002

S. Whimster

引用次数: 0

Zur Logik und Methodik der Sozialwissenschaften. Schriften 1900-1907 by Max Weber (review) 关于社会科学的逻辑和方法1907年作家麦克斯·韦伯评论

Max Weber Studies Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI: 10.1353/max.2019.0001

H. Bruun

引用次数: 0