Quality assessment of prenatal and puerperium care.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2023-07-31 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0094
Marcilene de Paula, Doroteia Aparecida Höfelmann
{"title":"Quality assessment of prenatal and puerperium care.","authors":"Marcilene de Paula, Doroteia Aparecida Höfelmann","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate prenatal and puerperium care levels received and identify their association with sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to December 2020 and included women who gave birth at the Municipal Hospital of Fazenda Rio Grande, Paraná, Brazil. Data were collected through interviews and review of portfolios and medical records. The variables extracted from the prenatal protocols of Paraná and the Ministry of Health were grouped into five compliance indices: CI1 - clinical examination; CI2 - health education; CI3 - queries; CI4 - examinations and vaccines; and CI5 - postpartum appointments. Prenatal care was considered adequate when 80% or more adequacy was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 307 women participated in this study. Prenatal compliance was 16.6% considering the entire set of variables. The best performance was for CI4 (54.7%) and the worst for CI5 (13.3%). The lowest adequacy occurred among single women (10.9%) compared to those who lived with a partner (19.9%) (p=0.043) and among women with black/brown skin color (9.5%) compared to those with white/yellow skin color (20.3%) (p=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most women did not receive adequate care, with those in situations of greater social vulnerability received worse quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10382073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate prenatal and puerperium care levels received and identify their association with sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to December 2020 and included women who gave birth at the Municipal Hospital of Fazenda Rio Grande, Paraná, Brazil. Data were collected through interviews and review of portfolios and medical records. The variables extracted from the prenatal protocols of Paraná and the Ministry of Health were grouped into five compliance indices: CI1 - clinical examination; CI2 - health education; CI3 - queries; CI4 - examinations and vaccines; and CI5 - postpartum appointments. Prenatal care was considered adequate when 80% or more adequacy was obtained.

Results: A total of 307 women participated in this study. Prenatal compliance was 16.6% considering the entire set of variables. The best performance was for CI4 (54.7%) and the worst for CI5 (13.3%). The lowest adequacy occurred among single women (10.9%) compared to those who lived with a partner (19.9%) (p=0.043) and among women with black/brown skin color (9.5%) compared to those with white/yellow skin color (20.3%) (p=0.016).

Conclusion: Most women did not receive adequate care, with those in situations of greater social vulnerability received worse quality care.

Abstract Image

产前和产褥期护理的质量评估。
目的:评估产前和产褥期护理水平,并确定其与社会人口统计学和产科特征的关系。方法:这项横断面研究于2020年5月至12月进行,包括在巴西巴拉那法曾达里奥格兰德市医院分娩的女性。数据是通过访谈和对档案和医疗记录的审查收集的。从巴拉那和卫生部的产前方案中提取的变量被分为五个依从性指数:CI1-临床检查;CI2——健康教育;CI3-查询;CI4-检查和疫苗;以及CI5——产后预约。当获得80%或以上的充分性时,产前护理被认为是充分的。结果:共有307名女性参与了这项研究。考虑到整个变量,产前依从性为16.6%。表现最好的是CI4(54.7%),最差的是CI5(13.3%)。与伴侣生活的女性(19.9%)(p=0.043)相比,单身女性(10.9%)的适足性最低,与白/黄肤色的女性(20.3%)相比,黑/棕色皮肤的女性(9.5%)的适适足性最差(p=0.016)。结论:大多数女性没有得到足够的护理,而那些社会脆弱性更大的人得到的护理质量更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信