[Integrated Care for Patients with Somatic Symptom Disorder in Primary Care - A Qualitative Participatory Evaluation of a Randomised Feasibility Trial].

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Justus Tönnies, Leike Graue, Marayah Ayoub-Schreifeldt, Michel Wensing, Joachim Szecsenyi, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Markus W Haun
{"title":"[Integrated Care for Patients with Somatic Symptom Disorder in Primary Care - A Qualitative Participatory Evaluation of a Randomised Feasibility Trial].","authors":"Justus Tönnies, Leike Graue, Marayah Ayoub-Schreifeldt, Michel Wensing, Joachim Szecsenyi, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Markus W Haun","doi":"10.1055/a-2105-3402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The VISION intervention is a manualized short-term treatment for people with somatic symptom disorder, integrated into the primary care and delivered by psychotherapists via video consultations. As an innovative technology-based approach, the intervention was most recently piloted in a randomized feasibility trial. During the qualitative accompanying study presented here, the intervention was evaluated and optimised from the user perspective of patients who participated in the feasibility study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed a total of N=10 patients included in the intervention group in three semi structured focus group discussions focusing on how they (1) assess the intervention in terms of acceptance and individual benefit and (2) which adjustments are necessary from the user perspective for further optimization of the intervention. We performed a qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA Plus 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents reported initial reservations on their part regarding care via video consultation. After a brief period of habituation, the intervention was universally accepted. Main suggestions for improvement included a stronger focus on supporting patients find follow-up psychotherapy (if indicated) more flexible settings (e. g., location of video consultation), and a stronger integration of treatment into primary care.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The study provides systematically elaborated comprehensive findings on participants' practical experiences with the intervention. The model is appropriate for treating people with somatic symptom disorder. Before implementation, important suggestions for improvement should be thoroughly considered with continued patient and public involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2105-3402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The VISION intervention is a manualized short-term treatment for people with somatic symptom disorder, integrated into the primary care and delivered by psychotherapists via video consultations. As an innovative technology-based approach, the intervention was most recently piloted in a randomized feasibility trial. During the qualitative accompanying study presented here, the intervention was evaluated and optimised from the user perspective of patients who participated in the feasibility study.

Methods: We interviewed a total of N=10 patients included in the intervention group in three semi structured focus group discussions focusing on how they (1) assess the intervention in terms of acceptance and individual benefit and (2) which adjustments are necessary from the user perspective for further optimization of the intervention. We performed a qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA Plus 2022.

Results: Respondents reported initial reservations on their part regarding care via video consultation. After a brief period of habituation, the intervention was universally accepted. Main suggestions for improvement included a stronger focus on supporting patients find follow-up psychotherapy (if indicated) more flexible settings (e. g., location of video consultation), and a stronger integration of treatment into primary care.

Discussion and conclusion: The study provides systematically elaborated comprehensive findings on participants' practical experiences with the intervention. The model is appropriate for treating people with somatic symptom disorder. Before implementation, important suggestions for improvement should be thoroughly considered with continued patient and public involvement.

[初级保健中躯体症状障碍患者的综合护理-一项随机可行性试验的定性参与评价]。
目的:VISION干预是一种针对躯体症状障碍患者的手动短期治疗,纳入初级护理,由心理治疗师通过视频咨询提供。作为一种基于技术的创新方法,该干预措施最近在一项随机可行性试验中进行了试点。在这里介绍的定性伴随研究中,从参与可行性研究的患者的用户角度对干预措施进行了评估和优化。方法:我们在三个半结构化的焦点小组讨论中采访了干预组中总共10名患者,重点讨论他们如何(1)从接受度和个人获益方面评估干预,以及(2)从用户角度来看,哪些调整对于进一步优化干预是必要的。我们使用MAXQDA Plus 2022进行了定性内容分析。结果:受访者通过视频咨询报告了他们对护理的初步保留意见。经过一段短暂的适应期后,这种干预措施被普遍接受。改善的主要建议包括更加重视支持患者找到更灵活的后续心理治疗(如果需要的话)。 g.视频咨询的地点),并将治疗更有力地纳入初级保健。讨论和结论:该研究对参与者的干预实践经验提供了系统阐述的全面调查结果。该模型适用于治疗躯体症状障碍患者。在实施之前,应在持续耐心和公众参与的情况下,彻底考虑重要的改进建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信