A History of Umbilical Vein Catheterization Does Not Preclude Children from a Successful Meso-Rex Bypass.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771225
Caroline P Lemoine, Stephanie Yang, Katherine A Brandt, Sydney Carra, Riccardo A Superina
{"title":"A History of Umbilical Vein Catheterization Does Not Preclude Children from a Successful Meso-Rex Bypass.","authors":"Caroline P Lemoine, Stephanie Yang, Katherine A Brandt, Sydney Carra, Riccardo A Superina","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) can cause portal venous thrombosis, leading to the development of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and portal hypertension (PHT). The feasibility of the Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) for the treatment of EHPVO in patients with a history of UVC has been questioned. We compared the feasibility of performing an MRB in patients with or without a history of previous UVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A retrospective review of patients with EHPVO and known UVC status explored for a possible MRB at our institution was performed (1997-2022). Patients were categorized in two groups: with (UVC(+)) or without (UVC(-)) a history of UVC for comparison. A <i>p</i>-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> One hundred and eighty-seven patients were included (<i>n</i> = 57 in UVC(+); <i>n</i> = 130 in UVC(-)). Patients in the UVC group were significantly younger at surgery and the incidence of prematurity was higher. Other risk factors for the development of EHPVO were similar between the groups, but only history of UVC could predict the ability to receive MRB (odds ratio [OR]: 7.4 [3.5-15.4]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The success rate of MRB was significantly higher in patients with no history of UVC (28/57 [49.1%] in UVC(+) vs. 114/130 [87.7%] in UVC(-); <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, MRB patency at discharge (25/28 [89.3%] in UVC(+) vs. 106/114 [94.7%] in UVC(-); <i>p</i> = 0.3) was equally high in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our results indicate that a history of UVC is not a contraindication to MRB. Half of the patients were able to successfully receive an MRB. Patients with symptomatic PHT from EHPVO should not be excluded from consideration for MRB based on UVC history.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:  Umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) can cause portal venous thrombosis, leading to the development of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and portal hypertension (PHT). The feasibility of the Meso-Rex bypass (MRB) for the treatment of EHPVO in patients with a history of UVC has been questioned. We compared the feasibility of performing an MRB in patients with or without a history of previous UVC.

Methods:  A retrospective review of patients with EHPVO and known UVC status explored for a possible MRB at our institution was performed (1997-2022). Patients were categorized in two groups: with (UVC(+)) or without (UVC(-)) a history of UVC for comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:  One hundred and eighty-seven patients were included (n = 57 in UVC(+); n = 130 in UVC(-)). Patients in the UVC group were significantly younger at surgery and the incidence of prematurity was higher. Other risk factors for the development of EHPVO were similar between the groups, but only history of UVC could predict the ability to receive MRB (odds ratio [OR]: 7.4 [3.5-15.4]; p < 0.001). The success rate of MRB was significantly higher in patients with no history of UVC (28/57 [49.1%] in UVC(+) vs. 114/130 [87.7%] in UVC(-); p < 0.001). However, MRB patency at discharge (25/28 [89.3%] in UVC(+) vs. 106/114 [94.7%] in UVC(-); p = 0.3) was equally high in both groups.

Conclusion:  Our results indicate that a history of UVC is not a contraindication to MRB. Half of the patients were able to successfully receive an MRB. Patients with symptomatic PHT from EHPVO should not be excluded from consideration for MRB based on UVC history.

脐静脉导管检查史并不妨碍儿童成功进行中胚层血管搭桥术。
导言:脐静脉导管插入术(UVC)可引起门静脉血栓形成,导致肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)和门静脉高压症(PHT)的发生。对于有紫外线照射史的患者,采用中雷克斯旁路术(MRB)治疗 EHPVO 的可行性一直受到质疑。我们比较了在既往有或没有紫外线照射史的患者中实施 MRB 的可行性:方法:我们对在本院接受 MRB 检查的已知有 UVC 病史的 EHPVO 患者进行了回顾性研究(1997-2022 年)。患者被分为两组:有(UVC(+))或无(UVC(-))UVC病史的患者,以便进行比较。P值小于0.05为有意义:共纳入 187 名患者(紫外线照射(+)组 57 人;紫外线照射(-)组 130 人)。紫外线组患者手术时的年龄明显更小,早产儿的发病率更高。两组患者发生 EHPVO 的其他风险因素相似,但只有 UVC 病史可预测接受 MRB 的能力(几率比 [OR]:7.4 [3.5-15.4];P P = 0.3)在两组中同样高:我们的研究结果表明,有紫外线照射史并不是 MRB 的禁忌症。结论:我们的研究结果表明,UVC 病史并不是 MRB 的禁忌症,半数患者能够成功接受 MRB。EHPVO引起的无症状PHT患者不应因UVC病史而被排除在MRB考虑范围之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信