Identifying Influential Nodes in Social Networks: Exploiting Self-Voting Mechanism.

IF 2.6 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Big Data Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1089/big.2022.0165
Panfeng Liu, Longjie Li, Yanhong Wen, Shiyu Fang
{"title":"Identifying Influential Nodes in Social Networks: Exploiting Self-Voting Mechanism.","authors":"Panfeng Liu,&nbsp;Longjie Li,&nbsp;Yanhong Wen,&nbsp;Shiyu Fang","doi":"10.1089/big.2022.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influence maximization (IM) problem is defined as identifying a group of influential nodes in a network such that these nodes can affect as many nodes as possible. Due to its great significance in viral marketing, disease control, social recommendation, and so on, considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of methods to solve the IM problem. In the literature, VoteRank and its improved algorithms have been proposed to select influential nodes based on voting approaches. However, in the voting process of these algorithms, a node cannot vote for itself. We argue that this voting schema runs counter to many real scenarios. To address this issue, we designed the VoteRank* algorithm, in which we first introduce the self-voting mechanism into the voting process. In addition, we also take into consideration the diversities of nodes. More explicitly, we measure the voting ability of nodes and the amount of a node voting for its neighbors based on the H-index of nodes. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is experimentally verified on 12 benchmark networks. The results demonstrate that VoteRank* is superior to the baseline methods in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":51314,"journal":{"name":"Big Data","volume":"11 4","pages":"296-306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2022.0165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence maximization (IM) problem is defined as identifying a group of influential nodes in a network such that these nodes can affect as many nodes as possible. Due to its great significance in viral marketing, disease control, social recommendation, and so on, considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of methods to solve the IM problem. In the literature, VoteRank and its improved algorithms have been proposed to select influential nodes based on voting approaches. However, in the voting process of these algorithms, a node cannot vote for itself. We argue that this voting schema runs counter to many real scenarios. To address this issue, we designed the VoteRank* algorithm, in which we first introduce the self-voting mechanism into the voting process. In addition, we also take into consideration the diversities of nodes. More explicitly, we measure the voting ability of nodes and the amount of a node voting for its neighbors based on the H-index of nodes. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is experimentally verified on 12 benchmark networks. The results demonstrate that VoteRank* is superior to the baseline methods in most cases.

识别社交网络中的影响节点:利用自投票机制。
影响力最大化(IM)问题被定义为识别网络中的一组有影响力的节点,使得这些节点可以影响尽可能多的节点。由于其在病毒营销、疾病控制、社会推荐等方面的重要意义,人们一直致力于开发解决IM问题的方法。在文献中,已经提出了VoteRank及其改进算法来基于投票方法来选择有影响力的节点。然而,在这些算法的投票过程中,节点不能为自己投票。我们认为,这种投票模式与许多实际情况背道而驰。为了解决这个问题,我们设计了VoteRank*算法,其中我们首先将自投票机制引入投票过程。此外,我们还考虑了节点的多样性。更明确地说,我们基于节点的H指数来衡量节点的投票能力和节点为其邻居投票的数量。在12个基准网络上对该算法的有效性进行了实验验证。结果表明,VoteRank*在大多数情况下都优于基线方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Big Data
Big Data COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Big Data is the leading peer-reviewed journal covering the challenges and opportunities in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating vast amounts of data. The Journal addresses questions surrounding this powerful and growing field of data science and facilitates the efforts of researchers, business managers, analysts, developers, data scientists, physicists, statisticians, infrastructure developers, academics, and policymakers to improve operations, profitability, and communications within their businesses and institutions. Spanning a broad array of disciplines focusing on novel big data technologies, policies, and innovations, the Journal brings together the community to address current challenges and enforce effective efforts to organize, store, disseminate, protect, manipulate, and, most importantly, find the most effective strategies to make this incredible amount of information work to benefit society, industry, academia, and government. Big Data coverage includes: Big data industry standards, New technologies being developed specifically for big data, Data acquisition, cleaning, distribution, and best practices, Data protection, privacy, and policy, Business interests from research to product, The changing role of business intelligence, Visualization and design principles of big data infrastructures, Physical interfaces and robotics, Social networking advantages for Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Google, etc, Opportunities around big data and how companies can harness it to their advantage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信