A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Sara Bousema, Arthur M Bohnen, Patrick J E Bindels, Gijs Elshout
{"title":"A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population.","authors":"Sara Bousema,&nbsp;Arthur M Bohnen,&nbsp;Patrick J E Bindels,&nbsp;Gijs Elshout","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma management. Searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases with end date 24 June 2022. The study population comprised children aged 5-18 years with asthma. Three reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed, using the COSMIN criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Studies conducted in primary care were included if a minimum of two questionnaires were compared. Studies in secondary or tertiary care and studies of quality-of-life questionnaires were excluded. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five publications were included: four observational studies and one sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 806 children were included (aged 5-18 years). We evaluated the Asthma Control Test (ACT), childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma APGAR system, NAEPP criteria and Royal College of Physicians' '3 questions' (RCP3Q). These questionnaires assess different symptoms and domains. The quality of most of the studies was rated 'intermediate' or 'poor'. The majority of the evaluated questionnaires do not show substantial agreement with one another, which makes a comparison challenging. Based on the current review, we suggest that the Asthma APGAR system seems promising as a questionnaire for determining asthma control in children in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma management. Searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases with end date 24 June 2022. The study population comprised children aged 5-18 years with asthma. Three reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed, using the COSMIN criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Studies conducted in primary care were included if a minimum of two questionnaires were compared. Studies in secondary or tertiary care and studies of quality-of-life questionnaires were excluded. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five publications were included: four observational studies and one sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 806 children were included (aged 5-18 years). We evaluated the Asthma Control Test (ACT), childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma APGAR system, NAEPP criteria and Royal College of Physicians' '3 questions' (RCP3Q). These questionnaires assess different symptoms and domains. The quality of most of the studies was rated 'intermediate' or 'poor'. The majority of the evaluated questionnaires do not show substantial agreement with one another, which makes a comparison challenging. Based on the current review, we suggest that the Asthma APGAR system seems promising as a questionnaire for determining asthma control in children in primary care.

Abstract Image

对初级保健人群中测量儿童哮喘控制的问卷进行系统回顾。
一些调查问卷用于测量儿童哮喘控制情况。在初级保健中使用的最适当工具尚未确定。在这篇系统综述中,我们评估了用于测量初级保健儿童哮喘控制的问卷,并确定了它们在哮喘管理中的有用性。在MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Google Scholar和Cochrane数据库中进行检索,截止日期为2022年6月24日。研究人群包括5-18岁患有哮喘的儿童。三位审稿人独立筛选研究并提取数据。使用COSMIN健康状况调查表测量特性的标准,对研究的方法学质量进行了评估。如果对至少两份问卷进行比较,则包括在初级保健中进行的研究。二级或三级护理研究和生活质量问卷研究被排除在外。异质性排除了meta分析。纳入了五篇出版物:四项观察性研究和一项随机对照试验的子研究。共纳入806名儿童(5-18岁)。我们评估了哮喘控制测试(ACT)、儿童哮喘控制测试(c-ACT)、哮喘APGAR系统、NAEPP标准和英国皇家医师学院的“3题”(RCP3Q)。这些问卷评估不同的症状和领域。大多数研究的质量被评为“中等”或“较差”。大多数被评估的问卷没有显示出彼此之间的实质性一致,这使得比较具有挑战性。基于目前的综述,我们认为哮喘APGAR系统似乎有希望作为确定初级保健儿童哮喘控制的问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信