[Evaluation of the implementation of non-pharmacological measures for the prevention and treatment of delirium: A retrospective cohort study].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000932
Nadia Blättler, Bianca Schaffert, Maria Schubert
{"title":"[Evaluation of the implementation of non-pharmacological measures for the prevention and treatment of delirium: A retrospective cohort study].","authors":"Nadia Blättler,&nbsp;Bianca Schaffert,&nbsp;Maria Schubert","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a000932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluation of the implementation of non-pharmacological measures for the prevention and treatment of delirium: A retrospective cohort study <b>Abstract.</b> <i>Background:</i> Delirium is burdensome for the affected patients, their relatives, hospital staff and the health care system. Preventing delirium with targeted multicomponent interventions is therefore essential. <i>Aim:</i> To investigate the implementation of defined non-pharmacological, preventive, and supportive measures in patients with an increased risk of delirium and/or delirium by the hospital's directions. <i>Methods:</i> In this observational study, routine data from 175 hospitalized patients were included. Data on delirium prevention, treatment and presence of delirium were extracted from the patient records and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Group comparisons were made between the medical/surgical clinic and the delirium/no delirium group. <i>Results:</i> Of the 175 patients, 31 had delirium. For delirium prevention, measures to improve oxygen supply, excretion, pain and mobility were most frequently implemented and measures such as improving cognition and communication were least frequently implemented. In the case of delirium, measures to modify risk factors, ensure safety, as well as prophylaxis were applied most frequently. Between the two clinics and between the delirium/no delirium group significant differences in the frequency of these measures were shown. <i>Conclusion:</i> The differences in frequency of implementation provide preliminary evidence that clinic-specific delirium prevention, early detection, and treatment may be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Evaluation of the implementation of non-pharmacological measures for the prevention and treatment of delirium: A retrospective cohort study Abstract. Background: Delirium is burdensome for the affected patients, their relatives, hospital staff and the health care system. Preventing delirium with targeted multicomponent interventions is therefore essential. Aim: To investigate the implementation of defined non-pharmacological, preventive, and supportive measures in patients with an increased risk of delirium and/or delirium by the hospital's directions. Methods: In this observational study, routine data from 175 hospitalized patients were included. Data on delirium prevention, treatment and presence of delirium were extracted from the patient records and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. Group comparisons were made between the medical/surgical clinic and the delirium/no delirium group. Results: Of the 175 patients, 31 had delirium. For delirium prevention, measures to improve oxygen supply, excretion, pain and mobility were most frequently implemented and measures such as improving cognition and communication were least frequently implemented. In the case of delirium, measures to modify risk factors, ensure safety, as well as prophylaxis were applied most frequently. Between the two clinics and between the delirium/no delirium group significant differences in the frequency of these measures were shown. Conclusion: The differences in frequency of implementation provide preliminary evidence that clinic-specific delirium prevention, early detection, and treatment may be needed.

[评价预防和治疗谵妄的非药物措施的实施:回顾性队列研究]。
评价预防和治疗谵妄的非药物措施的实施:一项回顾性队列研究摘要。背景:谵妄对患者、其亲属、医院工作人员和卫生保健系统都是沉重的负担。因此,通过有针对性的多组分干预措施预防谵妄是必不可少的。目的:调查在医院指示下谵妄和/或谵妄风险增加的患者中,明确的非药物、预防和支持措施的实施情况。方法:本观察性研究纳入175例住院患者的常规资料。从患者记录中提取有关谵妄预防、治疗和谵妄存在的数据,并采用适当的统计方法进行分析。将内科/外科门诊与谵妄/无谵妄组进行组间比较。结果:175例患者中有谵妄31例。对于谵妄的预防,改善供氧、排泄、疼痛和活动能力的措施最常被实施,而改善认知和沟通等措施最不常被实施。在谵妄的情况下,最常用的措施是改变危险因素,确保安全,以及预防。在两个诊所之间以及谵妄/无谵妄组之间,这些测量的频率显示出显着差异。结论:实施频率的差异提供了初步证据,表明可能需要临床特异性谵妄预防,早期发现和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信