Rethinking Vulnerability as a Radically Ethical Device: Ethical Vulnerability Analysis and the EU's "Migration Crisis".

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
Sylvie Da Lomba, Saskia Vermeylen
{"title":"Rethinking Vulnerability as a Radically Ethical Device: Ethical Vulnerability Analysis and the EU's \"Migration Crisis\".","authors":"Sylvie Da Lomba, Saskia Vermeylen","doi":"10.1007/s12142-023-00685-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We reinvigorate vulnerability theory as a radically ethical device - ethical vulnerability analysis. We bring together fuller vulnerability analysis as theorized by Fineman and Grear in conversation with Levinas and Derrida's radical vulnerability and the ethics of hospitality to construct a theoretical framework that is firmly anchored in the realities of the everyday that are vulnerability and migration. This novel framework offers a thinking space to subvert approaches to migrants and migration as it compels us to come face-to face with the \"other\", which in turn renders the political accountable by her. We deploy ethical vulnerability analysis to deconstruct the EU's \"migration crisis\" and investigate whether the activation of temporary protection for displaced persons from Ukraine signifies a humanizing turn in the EU's asylum and migration policies. In this regard, we submit that this hospitable moment constitutes an \"exception to the rule\" rather than a paradigm shift.</p>","PeriodicalId":45171,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-023-00685-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We reinvigorate vulnerability theory as a radically ethical device - ethical vulnerability analysis. We bring together fuller vulnerability analysis as theorized by Fineman and Grear in conversation with Levinas and Derrida's radical vulnerability and the ethics of hospitality to construct a theoretical framework that is firmly anchored in the realities of the everyday that are vulnerability and migration. This novel framework offers a thinking space to subvert approaches to migrants and migration as it compels us to come face-to face with the "other", which in turn renders the political accountable by her. We deploy ethical vulnerability analysis to deconstruct the EU's "migration crisis" and investigate whether the activation of temporary protection for displaced persons from Ukraine signifies a humanizing turn in the EU's asylum and migration policies. In this regard, we submit that this hospitable moment constitutes an "exception to the rule" rather than a paradigm shift.

重新思考脆弱性作为一种激进的伦理手段:伦理脆弱性分析与欧盟的“移民危机”。
我们重振脆弱性理论,将其作为一种激进的伦理手段——伦理脆弱性分析。我们将Fineman和Grear在与Levinas和Derrida的激进脆弱性和好客道德对话中提出的更全面的脆弱性分析结合在一起,以构建一个牢牢植根于脆弱性和移民这一日常现实的理论框架。这个新颖的框架提供了一个颠覆移民和移民方法的思考空间,因为它迫使我们与“另一个”面对面,这反过来又使她对政治负责。我们运用道德脆弱性分析来解构欧盟的“移民危机”,并调查对乌克兰流离失所者的临时保护是否意味着欧盟庇护和移民政策的人性化转变。在这方面,我们认为,这一好客的时刻是“规则的例外”,而不是范式的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Human Rights Review is an interdisciplinary journal which provides a scholarly forum in which human rights issues and their underlying empirical, theoretical and philosophical foundations are explored. The journal seeks to place human rights practices and policies within a theoretical perspective in order to link empirical research to broader human rights issues. Human Rights Review welcomes submissions from all academic areas in order to foster a wide-ranging dialogue on issues of concern to both the academic and the policy-making communities. The journal is receptive to submissions drawing from diverse methodologies and approaches including case studies, quantitative analysis, legal scholarship and philosophical discourse in order to provide a comprehensive discussion concerning human rights issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信