Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Paola Bucci, Armida Mucci, Giulia M Giordano, Edoardo Caporusso, Luigi Giuliani, Dino Gibertoni, Alessandro Rossi, Paola Rocca, Alessandro Bertolino, Silvana Galderisi
{"title":"Insight in cognitive impairment assessed with the Cognitive Assessment Interview in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia.","authors":"Paola Bucci, Armida Mucci, Giulia M Giordano, Edoardo Caporusso, Luigi Giuliani, Dino Gibertoni, Alessandro Rossi, Paola Rocca, Alessandro Bertolino, Silvana Galderisi","doi":"10.1007/s00406-023-01641-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). The present study aimed at assessing, in a large sample of SCZ (n = 601), the agreement between patients and their informants on CAI ratings, to explore patients' insight in their cognitive deficits and its relationships with clinical and functional indices. Agreement between patient- and informant-based ratings was assessed by the Gwet's agreement coefficient. Predictors of insight in cognitive deficits were explored by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Patients reported lower severity of cognitive impairment vs. informants. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between patients' and informants' ratings. Lower insight in cognitive deficits was associated to greater severity of neurocognitive impairment and positive symptoms, lower severity of depressive symptoms, and older age. Worse real-life functioning was associated to lower insight in cognitive deficit, worse neurocognitive performance, and worse functional capacity. Our findings indicate that the CAI is a valid co-primary measure with the interview to patients providing a reliable assessment of their cognitive deficits. In the absence of informants with good knowledge of the subject, the interview to the patient may represent a valid alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-023-01641-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). The present study aimed at assessing, in a large sample of SCZ (n = 601), the agreement between patients and their informants on CAI ratings, to explore patients' insight in their cognitive deficits and its relationships with clinical and functional indices. Agreement between patient- and informant-based ratings was assessed by the Gwet's agreement coefficient. Predictors of insight in cognitive deficits were explored by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Patients reported lower severity of cognitive impairment vs. informants. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was observed between patients' and informants' ratings. Lower insight in cognitive deficits was associated to greater severity of neurocognitive impairment and positive symptoms, lower severity of depressive symptoms, and older age. Worse real-life functioning was associated to lower insight in cognitive deficit, worse neurocognitive performance, and worse functional capacity. Our findings indicate that the CAI is a valid co-primary measure with the interview to patients providing a reliable assessment of their cognitive deficits. In the absence of informants with good knowledge of the subject, the interview to the patient may represent a valid alternative.

通过认知评估访谈评估大样本精神分裂症患者认知障碍的洞察力。
认知评估访谈(CAI)是一种基于访谈的量表,用于测量精神分裂症(SCZ)患者的认知障碍及其对功能的影响。本研究旨在评估大样本精神分裂症患者(n = 601)及其信息提供者对 CAI 评级的一致性,以探讨患者对其认知缺陷的洞察力及其与临床和功能指数的关系。患者评分与信息提供者评分之间的一致性通过 Gwet 一致系数进行评估。通过逐步多元回归分析探讨了认知缺陷洞察力的预测因素。患者与信息提供者相比,认知障碍的严重程度较低。患者和信息提供者的评分结果几乎完全一致。认知障碍的洞察力较低与神经认知障碍和阳性症状的严重程度较高、抑郁症状的严重程度较低以及年龄较大有关。较差的现实生活功能与较低的认知缺陷洞察力、较差的神经认知表现和较差的功能能力有关。我们的研究结果表明,CAI 是一种有效的共同主要测量方法,通过对患者的访谈可以对其认知缺陷进行可靠的评估。在缺乏对研究对象有充分了解的信息提供者的情况下,对患者进行访谈可能是一种有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信