Comparative Study of Intraoperative Fluorescein and Indocyanine Green Videoangiography for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Clipping: A Single Centre Study of 30 Cases.

Deepak Kumar Singh, Gaurav Sharma, Vipin Kumar Chand, Mohammad Kaif, Kuldeep Yadav
{"title":"Comparative Study of Intraoperative Fluorescein and Indocyanine Green Videoangiography for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Clipping: A Single Centre Study of 30 Cases.","authors":"Deepak Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Gaurav Sharma,&nbsp;Vipin Kumar Chand,&nbsp;Mohammad Kaif,&nbsp;Kuldeep Yadav","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1751006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim</b>  This study assesses the application of microscope integrated videoangiography techniques in aneurysm clipping surgery using Indocyanine Green and Fluorescein fluorophores and evaluates merits and demerits of each technique. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Total 30 patients of cerebral aneurysmal clipping were included. Standard microsurgical procedures were done. After clipping, we administered a 25 mg bolus intravenous dose of indocyanine green with microscope focused through the INFRARED 800 camera module, followed by administration of 60 mg bolus intravenous dose of fluorescein with microscope focused through the yellow 560 module and images were assessed. <b>Results</b>  The average aneurysm size was 17 mm. In 12 patients (40%), FL-VA allowed better assessment of perforating arteries (seven cases) or distal branches (three cases) or both (two cases), when compared with ICG-VA. In one case of MCA (M1) aneurysm, ICG-VA showed no fluorescent signal in one of the distal trunks whereas FL-VA showed normal signal. In one case of ACOM aneurysm, perforators were missed on ICG-VA but were seen on FL-VA. FL-VA was able to identify inadequate aneurysm clipping in one case. In two patients, FL-VA provided the advantage of real-time manipulation of the vessels to expose the vessels and aneurysms of interest. Fluorescein detected all the perforators that were visible under white light (68/68) whereas ICG was able to detect 56 (82.35%) perforators ( <i>p</i> -value< 0.05). <b>Conclusion</b>  Intraoperative ICG and Fluorescein videoangiography recognize inadequate occlusion of aneurysm, decreased flow in branches or perforators. When various study parameters were considered such as ability to assess small size perforators, branching vessels, adequacy of aneurysmal clipping, and useful information on repeat imaging, FL-VA was found superior to ICG-VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8521,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/8d/10-1055-s-0042-1751006.PMC10089731.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim  This study assesses the application of microscope integrated videoangiography techniques in aneurysm clipping surgery using Indocyanine Green and Fluorescein fluorophores and evaluates merits and demerits of each technique. Materials and Methods  Total 30 patients of cerebral aneurysmal clipping were included. Standard microsurgical procedures were done. After clipping, we administered a 25 mg bolus intravenous dose of indocyanine green with microscope focused through the INFRARED 800 camera module, followed by administration of 60 mg bolus intravenous dose of fluorescein with microscope focused through the yellow 560 module and images were assessed. Results  The average aneurysm size was 17 mm. In 12 patients (40%), FL-VA allowed better assessment of perforating arteries (seven cases) or distal branches (three cases) or both (two cases), when compared with ICG-VA. In one case of MCA (M1) aneurysm, ICG-VA showed no fluorescent signal in one of the distal trunks whereas FL-VA showed normal signal. In one case of ACOM aneurysm, perforators were missed on ICG-VA but were seen on FL-VA. FL-VA was able to identify inadequate aneurysm clipping in one case. In two patients, FL-VA provided the advantage of real-time manipulation of the vessels to expose the vessels and aneurysms of interest. Fluorescein detected all the perforators that were visible under white light (68/68) whereas ICG was able to detect 56 (82.35%) perforators ( p -value< 0.05). Conclusion  Intraoperative ICG and Fluorescein videoangiography recognize inadequate occlusion of aneurysm, decreased flow in branches or perforators. When various study parameters were considered such as ability to assess small size perforators, branching vessels, adequacy of aneurysmal clipping, and useful information on repeat imaging, FL-VA was found superior to ICG-VA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

30例脑破裂动脉瘤夹闭术中荧光素与吲哚菁绿血管造影的对比研究。
目的评价吲哚菁绿和荧光素荧光团在动脉瘤夹闭手术中的应用,并评价各技术的优缺点。材料与方法对30例脑动脉瘤夹闭患者进行回顾性分析。进行了标准显微外科手术。取片后,通过红外线800摄像模块显微镜聚焦给药25 mg静脉注射吲哚菁绿,然后通过黄色560摄像模块显微镜聚焦给药60 mg静脉注射荧光素,并对图像进行评估。结果动脉瘤平均大小为17 mm。在12例(40%)患者中,与ICG-VA相比,FL-VA可以更好地评估穿孔动脉(7例)或远端分支(3例)或两者(2例)。在1例MCA (M1)动脉瘤中,ICG-VA显示远端主干无荧光信号,而FL-VA显示正常信号。1例ACOM动脉瘤在ICG-VA上未见穿支,但在FL-VA上可见穿支。FL-VA能够在一个病例中识别出不充分的动脉瘤夹持。在两例患者中,FL-VA提供了实时操作血管以暴露感兴趣的血管和动脉瘤的优势。荧光素检测白光下所有可见穿支(68/68),ICG检测56支(82.35%)(p值< 0.05)。结论术中ICG和荧光素血管造影可识别动脉瘤闭塞不足、分支或穿支血流减少。考虑到各种研究参数,如评估小尺寸穿支、分支血管、动脉瘤夹闭的充分性和重复成像的有用信息,FL-VA优于ICG-VA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信