Describing communication profiles of low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Mariagrazia Zuccarini , Annalisa Guarini , Dino Gibertoni , Chiara Suttora , Arianna Aceti , Luigi Corvaglia , Arianna Bello , Maria Cristina Caselli , Alessandra Sansavini
{"title":"Describing communication profiles of low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers","authors":"Mariagrazia Zuccarini ,&nbsp;Annalisa Guarini ,&nbsp;Dino Gibertoni ,&nbsp;Chiara Suttora ,&nbsp;Arianna Aceti ,&nbsp;Luigi Corvaglia ,&nbsp;Arianna Bello ,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Caselli ,&nbsp;Alessandra Sansavini","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Late talkers represent a heterogeneous population. We aimed to describe communication profiles of low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers according to their receptive and expressive vocabulary size, considering communicative, linguistic, cognitive, and motor skills, as well as biological and environmental risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty-eight late talkers (33 born low-risk preterm and 35 full-term) were identified through a language screening at 30 months. Parents filled out the Italian Short Forms of the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories and the Socio Conversational Skills Rating Scales. Children were assessed with the Picture Naming Game test and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A two-step cluster analysis identified three distinct profiles among late talkers according to their receptive and expressive vocabulary size. <em>Severe</em> late talkers (25%) showed less frequent use of pointing, limited verbal imitation, receptive vocabulary size, lexical and sentence production, responsiveness and assertiveness, and lower cognitive scores than <em>mild</em> late talkers (40%). <em>Moderate</em> late talkers (35%) showed less frequent verbal imitation, limited lexical and sentence production and lower cognitive scores than <em>mild</em> late talkers. Male gender was significantly more represented in the <em>severe</em> late profile, whereas other biological and environmental factors did not differ among the three profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings highlighted the relevance of assessing communicative, lexical, grammar, pragmatic, and cognitive skills to describe late talkers’ profiles. A deeper investigation of phonological skills might also contribute to a further understanding of interindividual variability in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 106336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Late talkers represent a heterogeneous population. We aimed to describe communication profiles of low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers according to their receptive and expressive vocabulary size, considering communicative, linguistic, cognitive, and motor skills, as well as biological and environmental risk factors.

Methods

Sixty-eight late talkers (33 born low-risk preterm and 35 full-term) were identified through a language screening at 30 months. Parents filled out the Italian Short Forms of the MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventories and the Socio Conversational Skills Rating Scales. Children were assessed with the Picture Naming Game test and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.

Results

A two-step cluster analysis identified three distinct profiles among late talkers according to their receptive and expressive vocabulary size. Severe late talkers (25%) showed less frequent use of pointing, limited verbal imitation, receptive vocabulary size, lexical and sentence production, responsiveness and assertiveness, and lower cognitive scores than mild late talkers (40%). Moderate late talkers (35%) showed less frequent verbal imitation, limited lexical and sentence production and lower cognitive scores than mild late talkers. Male gender was significantly more represented in the severe late profile, whereas other biological and environmental factors did not differ among the three profiles.

Conclusions

Findings highlighted the relevance of assessing communicative, lexical, grammar, pragmatic, and cognitive skills to describe late talkers’ profiles. A deeper investigation of phonological skills might also contribute to a further understanding of interindividual variability in this population.

描述低风险早产和足月晚说话者的沟通情况
引言晚说话的人代表了一个异质的群体。我们的目的是根据低风险早产和足月晚说话者的接受和表达词汇量,考虑到沟通、语言、认知和运动技能,以及生物和环境风险因素,描述他们的沟通情况。方法在30个月时通过语言筛查确定68名晚说话者(33名早产低危儿和35名足月儿)。家长们填写了麦克阿瑟-贝茨交际发展量表和社会会话技能评定量表的意大利简表。使用图片命名游戏测试和Bayley婴幼儿发展量表对儿童进行评估。结果两步聚类分析根据晚语者的接受和表达词汇量确定了三种不同的特征。与轻度晚语者(40%)相比,重度晚语者表现出较少的指向、有限的言语模仿、可接受的词汇量、词汇和句子的产生、反应性和自信,以及较低的认知得分。与轻度晚语者相比,中度晚语者(35%)表现出较少的言语模仿、有限的词汇和句子生成以及较低的认知得分。男性在严重晚期特征中的代表性明显更高,而其他生物和环境因素在三种特征中没有差异。结论研究强调了评估交际、词汇、语法、语用和认知技能与描述晚说话者的个人资料的相关性。对语音技能的深入研究也可能有助于进一步了解这一群体的个体间变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信