Developing a Physician-Led Model for Research Mentorship in Academic Urology.

IF 2.5 2区医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY

Current Urology Reports Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s11934-023-01148-7

Marco-Jose Rivero, Farah Rahman, Katherine Campbell, Braian Rene Ledesma, Ranjith Ramasamy

{"title":"Developing a Physician-Led Model for Research Mentorship in Academic Urology.","authors":"Marco-Jose Rivero, Farah Rahman, Katherine Campbell, Braian Rene Ledesma, Ranjith Ramasamy","doi":"10.1007/s11934-023-01148-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of review: Quality mentorship is difficult to attain amidst the conflicting demands of academic medicine. In this review, we sought to characterize mentor-mentee relationships and discuss their optimization towards productivity in the research team setting.Recent findings: A high-value mentor, defined by exceptional commitment to both research productivity and mentoring, naturally attracts prospective mentees, who can demonstrate their interest by shadowing and completing delegated tasks. Once fully initiated, the mentee establishes expectations with the mentor, identifies their roles within the research team, and, over time, takes ownership of the mentor-mentee relationship and collaborates with near-peers. Mentorship is a dynamic, reciprocal relationship that enhances career development of both participants. In the research team setting, episodic virtual research meetings and prudent delegation orient the entire team, while the mentor-mentee relationship is upheld by embracing a culture of responsiveness, feedback, and collaboration.","PeriodicalId":11112,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01148-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Quality mentorship is difficult to attain amidst the conflicting demands of academic medicine. In this review, we sought to characterize mentor-mentee relationships and discuss their optimization towards productivity in the research team setting.

Recent findings: A high-value mentor, defined by exceptional commitment to both research productivity and mentoring, naturally attracts prospective mentees, who can demonstrate their interest by shadowing and completing delegated tasks. Once fully initiated, the mentee establishes expectations with the mentor, identifies their roles within the research team, and, over time, takes ownership of the mentor-mentee relationship and collaborates with near-peers. Mentorship is a dynamic, reciprocal relationship that enhances career development of both participants. In the research team setting, episodic virtual research meetings and prudent delegation orient the entire team, while the mentor-mentee relationship is upheld by embracing a culture of responsiveness, feedback, and collaboration.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

发展医师主导的学术泌尿学研究指导模式。

回顾目的:在医学学术需求的冲突中，高质量的师徒关系难以实现。在这篇综述中，我们试图描述师徒关系的特征，并讨论他们在研究团队环境中对生产力的优化。最近的研究发现:一个高价值的导师，在研究效率和指导方面都有特殊的承诺，自然会吸引潜在的学员，他们可以通过跟随和完成委派的任务来展示他们的兴趣。一旦完全开始，学员就会与导师建立期望，确定他们在研究团队中的角色，并随着时间的推移，掌握导师与学员的关系，并与同龄人合作。师徒关系是一种动态的、互惠的关系，可以促进双方的职业发展。在研究团队设置中，偶发的虚拟研究会议和谨慎的授权指导了整个团队，而导师与学员的关系则通过拥抱响应、反馈和协作的文化来维持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Current Urology Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

3.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal intends to review the most important, recently published findings in the field of urology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the care and prevention of urologic diseases and conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction, female urology, and kidney disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.