David Kanyinda Kayembe, Koji Hosokawa, Yurie Obata, Tetsuro Isada, Hiroko Shigemi, Kenji Shigemi
{"title":"A Pilot Estimation of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling Using a Vascular Screening Device (VaSera<sup>®</sup>).","authors":"David Kanyinda Kayembe, Koji Hosokawa, Yurie Obata, Tetsuro Isada, Hiroko Shigemi, Kenji Shigemi","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive cardiovascular assessment has become an alternative to invasive techniques. VaSera<sup>®</sup>, a vascular screening device, measures arterial stiffness with the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); it also measures cardiophysiological variables of ejection time (ET) and pre-ejection period (PEP). We aimed to apply the parameters obtained by VaSera<sup>®</sup> to estimate heart function based on left ventricular end-systolic elastance/arterial elastance (Ees/Ea) and to assess the minimal required number of measurements for estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an experimental laboratory study for healthy volunteers. Using the previously established formula, the Ees/Ea value of each participant was estimated using ET and PEP values measured by VaSera<sup>®</sup>. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed the minimum required number of measurements. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland and Altman analysis assessed variation of Ees/Ea estimation against the trimmed average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 660 measurements from 132 participants were included. The Ees/Ea estimates from the VaSera<sup>®</sup> were 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]. The ICC for Ees/Ea was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.77), suggesting that four measurements were required. The CCC between the trimmed average of Ees/Ea and the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates was 0.99. Bland and Altman analysis showed excellent agreement for the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates and the trimmed average of Ees/Ea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For screening of heart failure, the Ees/Ea estimated using non-invasive vascular-stiffness assessment device would be tolerable and four sequential measurements were required.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"90 2","pages":"220-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2023_90-212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Non-invasive cardiovascular assessment has become an alternative to invasive techniques. VaSera®, a vascular screening device, measures arterial stiffness with the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI); it also measures cardiophysiological variables of ejection time (ET) and pre-ejection period (PEP). We aimed to apply the parameters obtained by VaSera® to estimate heart function based on left ventricular end-systolic elastance/arterial elastance (Ees/Ea) and to assess the minimal required number of measurements for estimation.
Methods: We conducted an experimental laboratory study for healthy volunteers. Using the previously established formula, the Ees/Ea value of each participant was estimated using ET and PEP values measured by VaSera®. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed the minimum required number of measurements. Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland and Altman analysis assessed variation of Ees/Ea estimation against the trimmed average.
Results: A total of 660 measurements from 132 participants were included. The Ees/Ea estimates from the VaSera® were 1.5 [1.2, 1.9]. The ICC for Ees/Ea was 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.77), suggesting that four measurements were required. The CCC between the trimmed average of Ees/Ea and the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates was 0.99. Bland and Altman analysis showed excellent agreement for the mean of four Ees/Ea estimates and the trimmed average of Ees/Ea.
Conclusions: For screening of heart failure, the Ees/Ea estimated using non-invasive vascular-stiffness assessment device would be tolerable and four sequential measurements were required.
期刊介绍:
The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.