Radical Freud (Part Two): Freud's Bisexuality Thesis and the Negation of the Oedipus Complex.

Q4 Medicine
Thomas Olver
{"title":"Radical Freud (Part Two): Freud's Bisexuality Thesis and the Negation of the Oedipus Complex.","authors":"Thomas Olver","doi":"10.1521/prev.2023.110.2.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author focuses on bisexuality in a continued analysis of Freud's radical sexual theory. A close reading of texts from Freud's work, in particular \"The Ego and the Id,\" demonstrates how Freud puts forward a bisexuality thesis in parallel and as an alternative to his thesis of the Oedipus complex. This bisexuality thesis is premised on the mechanism of object cathexis and identification by which the ego and superego are formed. The textual excavation is extended back to earlier material by Freud and other authors (Trigant Burrow, Isidor Sadger) to reveal the foundational bedrock of the bisexuality thesis in primary identification. This line of investigation boldly confirms not only Freud's view of the fundamental centrality of bisexuality to human sexuality but also its main consequence, which Freud himself implicitly recognizes, namely, the negation of the Oedipus complex. This argument has ramifications for the theory and clinical practice of psychoanalysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":39855,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Review","volume":"110 2","pages":"161-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2023.110.2.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The author focuses on bisexuality in a continued analysis of Freud's radical sexual theory. A close reading of texts from Freud's work, in particular "The Ego and the Id," demonstrates how Freud puts forward a bisexuality thesis in parallel and as an alternative to his thesis of the Oedipus complex. This bisexuality thesis is premised on the mechanism of object cathexis and identification by which the ego and superego are formed. The textual excavation is extended back to earlier material by Freud and other authors (Trigant Burrow, Isidor Sadger) to reveal the foundational bedrock of the bisexuality thesis in primary identification. This line of investigation boldly confirms not only Freud's view of the fundamental centrality of bisexuality to human sexuality but also its main consequence, which Freud himself implicitly recognizes, namely, the negation of the Oedipus complex. This argument has ramifications for the theory and clinical practice of psychoanalysis.

激进的弗洛伊德(下):弗洛伊德的双性恋命题和对俄狄浦斯情结的否定。
在对弗洛伊德激进性理论的持续分析中,作者着重于双性恋。仔细阅读弗洛伊德作品中的文本,特别是“自我和本我”,可以看出弗洛伊德是如何平行地提出双性恋命题的,并将其作为俄狄浦斯情结论题的替代。这篇双性恋论文的前提是,自我和超我形成的客体主导和认同机制。文本挖掘延伸到弗洛伊德和其他作者(特里甘特·伯罗,伊西多尔·萨杰)的早期材料,以揭示双性恋论文在初级鉴定中的基本基石。这条调查路线大胆地证实了弗洛伊德的观点,即双性恋对人类性行为的基本中心地位,以及它的主要后果,弗洛伊德自己也含蓄地承认,即对俄狄浦斯情结的否定。这一争论对精神分析的理论和临床实践产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychoanalytic Review
Psychoanalytic Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: In six issues per year, The Psychoanalytic Review publishes peer-reviewed articles on a wide range of theoretical, clinical and cultural topics, including interdisciplinary studies, which help advance psychoanalytic theory and understanding of therapeutic process. Special Issues, organized by guest editors with recognized knowledge in a specific area within the field of psychoanalysis or intersecting with it, are an important feature of the Review. The journal also publishes reviews of books and films of interest to psychoanalysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信